A magazine produced cultural politics which the new age required, meeting the desire and ambition of public reader based on commercial applications since the modern age. While a magazine for amusements occupied extensively publication market and public reader in 1950’s, MyeongRang (『명랑』) of them played a role in constructing the identity of a magazine for amusements as a public place of sexual opinion. Especially, as a love affair novel in MyeongRang in 1950’s targeted at young people in their twenties, it was discussing sexual fantasy as a discourse. In addition, while it made sexual fantasies popularize, it generated the certain cultural and political effect. However, there was subtle change in the way after and before 1958. In other words, as women found sexual-ego when crossing the borderline between ‘inside’ and ‘outside’ family in a love affair novel in the middle of 1950s, they were reproduced as an active subject that could have a right to a sexual Selfdetermination to decide. As women felt an atmosphere of terror caused by sexual deviance by themselves and controlled their sexual desire, they got to ‘inside’ family. As the result, the readers enjoyed the sexual fantasy of a love affair novel without anxiety. On the other hand, just man was reproduced as a subject that had a right to a sexual self-determination to decide in a love affair novel in the late 50’s. As the result, it was divided naturally woman into ‘inside’ and ‘outside’ family and derived strongly more the patriarchal ideology that compelled sex norms of woman. Therefore, it was ridiculed, and adjusted them to unconsciously accept the ideas that it is common sense and universal that the sexual desire of woman is collected to just man ‘inside' family. Like such that, MyeongRang recognized sex as spirit of freedom and challenge in the mid-50’s, on the other hand, it cooperated to the cultural managed by the Korean Government and became as entertainment consumption goods of the images composed with faked reality, so it was eliminating spirit of liberalism inside sexual desire. Therefore, a love affair novel in MyeongRang constituted its identity as Kitsch on amusement offerings that commercialized sex and consumed, and played a part for making reading novel as a substandard goods, which promoted taste-class after modern times.
명랑 , 1956.1-1960.2.
아리랑 , 1955.3-1960.8.
월간 희망 , 1952.6-1958.6.
김겸섭, 「바타이유의 에로티즘과 위반의 시학」, 인문과학연구 36권, 대구대인문대과학연구소,2011, 83-114쪽.
김미영, 「킨제이를 통해 본 자유주의 성 해방론과 그에 대한 비판」, 사회와 이론 7집, 한국이론사회학회, 2005, 215-259쪽.
김복순, 「전후 여성교양의 재배치와 젠더 정치」, 여성문학연구 18호, 한국여성문학학회, 2007.12, 7-60쪽.
김신현경, 「성적 주체로서의 여성, 욕망과 폭력 ‘사이’?」, 여성과 사회 13호, 한국여성연구소, 2001, 44-64쪽.
김지영, 「1950년대 잡지 명랑 의 ‘성’과 ‘연애’ 표상-기사, 화보, 유머란(1956~1959)을 중심으로」, 개념과 소통 10호, 2012, 173-206쪽.
김현주, 「1950년대 잡지 아리랑 과 명랑소설의 ‘명랑성’: 가족서사를 중심으로」, 인문학연구 43권, 조선대 인문학연구소, 2012, 173-206쪽.
김현주, 「1950년대 여성잡지 여원 과 ‘제도로서의 주부’의 탄생」, 대중서사연구 18호, 대중서사학회, 2007.12, 387-416쪽.
박형준, 「성적 욕망과 자아, 그리고 친밀성의 논리」, 고려사회학논집 8집, 고려대사회학연구회, 1994, 97-117쪽.
이봉범, 「1950년대 잡지저널리즘과 문학-대중잡지를 중심으로」, 상허학보 30호, 상허학회, 2010, 397-454쪽.
이영미, 「성애의 시대, 여성 주체와 섹슈얼리티」, 국제어문 33권, 국제어문학회, 2004, 293-321쪽.
이을상, 「성애의 본질」, 철학논총 31집 1권, 새한철학회, 2003, 125-147쪽.
조윤정, 「전후세대 작가들의 언어적 상황과 정체성 혼란의 문제」, 현대소설연구 37권, 한국현대소설학회, 2008.4, 229-258쪽.
조찬수, 「전후 국제 경제 질서의 국내 정치적 기반: 내장된 자유주의에 대한 하나의 역사 제도주의적 설명」, 한국정치학회보 37권 2호, 한국정치학회, 2003, 307-325쪽.
최기숙, 「‘성적’ 인간의 발견과 ‘욕망’의 수사학 : 18-19세기 야담집의 ‘기생 일화’를 중심으로」, 국제어문 26권, 국제어문학회, 2002, 53-90쪽.
Georges Bataille, 조한경 역, 에로티즘의 역사 , 민음사, 1998.
Jean Baudrillard, 배영달 역, 유혹에 대하여 , 백의, 2002.
Marilyn Yalom., 이호영 역, 순종 혹은 반항의 역사 아내 , 시공사, 2003.
Michel Foucault, 이규현 역, 성의 역사 1-앎의 의지 , 나남, 1995.