바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

대중서사연구

새로운 인간 종의 탄생과 진화론적 상상력-『프랑켄슈타인』과 <트랜센던스>를 중심으로

A Birth of new human species and the evolutionary imagination

대중서사연구 / 대중서사연구, (P)1738-3188; (E)27139964
2014, v.20 no.3, pp.339-366
https://doi.org/10.18856/jpn.2014.20.3.011
오윤호 (이화여자대학교)

Abstract

A Birth of new human species and the evolutionary imaginationOh, Youn-Ho (Ewha Women’s University)This study takes a close look at Frankenstein, a science fiction written in the early modern era by Mary Shelley, and Transcendence, a 21st century film directed by Wally Pfister, to identify how scientific knowledge is utilized to create new human species in the cultural context. Also, the study identifies and analyzes changes in evolutionary imaginations stemming from the development of new technologies and scientific knowledge ranging from evolutionary theory to quantum dynamics and nanotechnology. In this study, the author attempted to take a fresh approach to science fiction to reach a conclusion that cultural plots that cut across the fields of science and fiction are not always fake and fictional but can be reasonable and futuristic. Through this observation and analysis, the author tries to present a new vision for anthropology based on humanities in the 21st century. Human evolution in this context does not merely mean biological evolution. Evolution functions as imagination and knowledge that are important to understand humanity amid rapid changes in our society and technology. The concepts of natural selection and survival of the fittest that underpin evolutionary theory take new perspectives and logics depending on cultural, historical and scientific contexts. Human evolution illustrated in Frankenstein and Transcendence may be the realization of human desires for immortality and tragic nature that is intrinsic in science and technology. Evolving into immortal beings has been the longest dream of mankind. Now, it has become a possibility that may come trun in the future.

keywords
Frankenstein, Human Evolution, Transcendence, Science Knowledge, Human species, Transhumanism, 프랑켄슈타인, 인간 진화, 트랜센던스, 과학, 지식, 인간 종, 진화론, 트랜스휴머니즘

참고문헌

1.

메리셜리, 프랑켄슈타인 , 문학동네, 2008.

2.

영화 <트랜센던스>, 2014.

3.

고장원, 세계과학소설사 , 채륜, 2008, 39-40쪽.

4.

김성곤, 경계를 넘어서는 문학 , 민음사, 2013, 228쪽.

5.

김연순, 기계인간에서 사이버휴먼으로 , 성균관대학교 출판부, 2009, 139-140쪽.

6.

마정미, 포스트휴먼과 탈근대적 주체 , 커뮤니케이션북스, 2014, 서문 참조.

7.

승현준, 커넥톰, 뇌의 지도 , 김영사, 2014, 430쪽.

8.

신상규, 호모 사피엔스의 미래 , 아카넷, 2014.

9.

이화인문과학원 편, 인간과 포스트휴머니즘 , 이화여자대학교출판부, 2013, 170쪽.

10.

도미니크 바뱅, 양영란 역, 포스트휴먼과의 만남 , 궁리, 2007.

11.

로버트 스콜즈 & 에릭 랩킨, SF의 이해 , 평민사, 1993, 17쪽.

12.

브라이언 보이드, 이야기의 기원: 인간은 왜 스토리텔링에 탐닉하는가? , 휴머니스트, 2013, 537쪽.

13.

샬로테 케르니 역, 판타스틱6 , 위즈덤피플, 2011, 251쪽.

14.

질리언 비어, 다윈의 플롯 , 휴머니스트, 2008.

15.

찰스 다윈, 송철용 옮김, 종의 기원 , 동서문화사, 2013, 4-5쪽.

16.

캐서린 헤일스, 허진 역, 우리는 어떻게 포스트휴먼이 되었는가 , 플래닛, 2013.

17.

Eric S. Rabkin and Carl P. Simon, “Age, Sex, and Evolution in the Science Fiction Marketplace.” Interdisciplinary Literary Studies 2.2(2001): 45-58. JSTOR. Web. 6Dec. 2012. 참조

18.

Denis Dutton, The Art Instinct: Beauty, Pleasure, and Human Evolution, Bloomsbury Press, 2009.

19.

Brian Boyd, Joseph Carroll, and Jonathan Gottschall, Evolution Literature & Film: A Reader, Columbia University Press, 2010.

20.

Joseph Carroll, Literary Darwinism, Routledge, 2004.

21.

George Levine, Darw in a nd the Novelists: P atterns of S cience in V ictorian F iction, University of Chicago Press, 1992.

22.

참고사이트 http://www.umich.edu/~genreevo/

대중서사연구