ISSN : 1738-3188
The “ethical turn” in literary criticism is the significant stream which try to restore the relation of literature and reality(society) and to reflect newly on that relation after post-structuralism or deconstructuralism. This paper aims at the examinaton on the form of “ethical turn” in literary criticism centered on Zhenzhao Nie’s An Introduction to Ethical Literary Criticism(文学伦理学批评导论, 2014), and the discussion of the form of relation of literature and society or the way of intervention of ethics in literary criticism. To deal with the problem of the lack of ethics in Chinese literature, Nie explains the definition of the man as the ethical being, the ethical redefition of literature, and the ethical structure of literary text. Firstly, on the basis of Darwin’s theory of evolution he defines the man as the being which made by ethical choice. The ability to distinguish good and bad(ethical consciousness) is the standard to distinguish the man and animals. In this, the nature of Sphinx as the combination of the human-brain and animal-body is named as “Sphinx factor”, and the hybridity of ‘human factor’ and ‘animal factor’ is considered as the essense of the man. Secondly, on the basis of the definition of the man as the ethical being he tries to do the ethical redefinition of the notion of literature. To do this redefinition, he explains the various forms of that two factors, and traces the ethical origin of literature anthropologically. And finally he explains the ethical structure of literary text. The ethical structure consists of ethical lines and ethical knots, and the ethical knots make the ethical delemma, ethical paradox, ethical confusion, ethical identity, etc. Nie’s ethical literary criticism has two problems. The one is the oscillation between historicist approach and trans-historicist approach, the another is the ambiguity of the social function of literature (the notion of ‘moral teaching’). But, ethical literary criticim is meaningful to study on korean narratives and literary criticism. Because nowaday the ethics of literature or the social responsibility of literature is the significant issue. And ethical literary criticism seek to do “cooperation” with another theories to avoid its simplification.
가라타니 고진, 『근대문학의 종언』, 조영일 옮김, 도서출판 b, 2006.
김홍중, 「근대문학의 종언론에 대한 비판」, 『마음의 사회학』, 문학동네, 2009.
미하일 바흐찐, 「예술과 책임」,『예술과 책임』, 최건영 옮김, 문학에디션 뿔, 2011.
오민석, 「타자의 윤리학과 문학이론」, 『현대영미어문학』 제32권 1호, 2014, 103-122쪽.
황종연, 「문학의 묵시록 이후―가라타니 고진의 「근대문학의 종언」을 읽고」, 『현대문학』 2006년 8월호, 193-215쪽.
이탈로 칼비노, 『반쪼가리 자작』, 이현경 옮김, 민음사, 1997.
Altes, Liesbeth Korthas, “Ethical Turn,” in David Herman, Manfred Jahn, and Marie-Laure Ryan, Routledge Encyclopedia of Narrative Theory, London: Routledge, 2005.
Biwu, Shang, “Ethical Criticism and Literary Studies: A Book Review Article about Nie’s Work,” CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture, Vol. 15, No.6, 2013, pp.1-6.
Ranciére, Jacques, “The Ethical Turn of Aesthetics and Politics,” Jean-Philippe Deranty (trans.), Critical Horizons, Vol.7, No.1, 2006, pp.1-20.
聂珍钊, 文学伦理学批评导论, 北京: 北京大學出版社, 2014.