ISSN : 1738-3188
This paper is an essay for the theoretical research on adaptation in new media era, and aims at the excavating of theoretical and political potentials through the close reading of Linda Hutcheon’s The theory of Adaptation(Second Edition). Hutcheon problematize the fact that although adapatations are ubiquitous many scholars have an negative view on it. Storytelling is essentially intertextual, and genres or media are all the same as the forem of intertextuality, so all storytellings are considered as kind of adaptations. Then, “treating adaptations as adaptations” are needed. To do this work, Hutcheon introduces the category of “mode of engagement” instead of genre or media, and examines the problem of forms in tems of three type of adaptations(telling↔showing, showing↔showing, interacting↔telling or showing), then explaines the broad communicative context (adpator, audience, context). In “Preface to the second edition”, Hutcheon focuses on the transmedia storytelling which have been formed as the new entertainment norm. Here, adaptation becomes not the adaptation of narrative or story, but story world, that is, “world building.” So, Hutcheon confesses the limitation that only the definition of “repetition with variation” could not explain the adaptation in new medea era. Whereas, Siobhan O’Flynn’s “epilogue” shows that Hutcheon’s theory of adapatation have a power to explain not only the adaptations across genres or media, but also the adaptations in such various ereas as fan communities, social webs, marketing, social practice, I-Pad, and so on. The Hutcheon’s theory of adaptations have its significance in that the theory make possible to understand the extended adaptation. In special, the emphasis on “adaptor” and “audience” which comes from the awareness of the significance of audience’s participation in new media shows the necessity of critical reconsideration on the theorem of what they call as “death of author.” And, most of all, the politics of adaptation which would break down the hierarchy of genres or media could contribute to break down the hierachy of real world through the practice of “audience=adaptor=subject” as “author” of “world building.”
Linda Hutcheon, The theory of Adaptation(Second Edition), London and New York: Routledge, 2013.
김희경, 『트랜스미디어 콘텐츠의 세계』, 커뮤니케이션북스, 2015
박기수, 「One Source Multi Use 활성화를 위한 문화콘텐츠 스토리텔링 전환 연구」, 『한국언어문화』44, 한국언어문화학회, 2011, 155-176쪽.
서성은, 「린다 허천의 각색 담론」, 『우리어문연구』48, 우리어문학회, 2014, 319-353쪽.
소영현, 「열풍시대의 문화적 감염력과 감성정치」, 『대중서사연구』21-1, 대중서사학회, 2015, 7-32쪽.
오은경, 「트랜스미디어 또는 인터미디어」, 『독일어문학』65, 한국독일어문학회, 2014, 75-94쪽.
유제상, 「트랜스미디어와 사용자 참여에 관한 연구」, 『글로벌문화콘텐츠』21, 글로벌문화콘텐츠학회, 2015, 185-209쪽.
장미영, 「소설과 미디어콘텐츠의 상호매체성」, 『국어문학』52, 국어문학회, 2012, 255-286쪽.
마샬 매클루언, 『미디어의 이해』, 김상호 역, 커뮤니케이션북스, 2011
헨리 젠킨스, 『컨버전스 컬처』, 김정희원・김동신 역, 비즈앤비즈, 2008.
Thomas Leitch, “New! Expand! Umimproved!”, Literature Film Quarterly 41(2), 2013, pp.157-160.