This paper examined the meaning and task of romance research with a focus on Reading the Romance(1984) by Janice A. Radway. This book, which analyzes romance texts by examining the situation and meaning of reading romance by women readers integrating between cultural studies and literary studies, is one of the most popular studies on the romance genre. Radway scrutinized the practical significance of reading romance in a community of women readers. Through a study involving questionnaires and in-depth interviews, she found that for women, romance reading is a ‘compensatory fiction’ that brings happiness and emotional redemption through a sense of liberation achieved by escaping from patriarchal daily life. The romance that women prefer is composed of 4 stages and 13 divisions: ‘Encounter → Attest → Recovery → Happy End’. It also maintains a formula that begins with an immature female character’s identity crisis and ends with a blissful union that recognizes the intrinsic value of the main character, who has turned into a man who is considerate of the women. Therefore, romance plays the role of pursuit of the ‘female utopian fantasy’ and at the same time a reconciliation of women to patriarchy. Feminist critics of the day criticized this argument. However, reading romance is a ‘feminine reading’, and romance is literature about the functional relationship between women’s lives and patriarchy. Yet the interpretation could differ depending on the different viewpoints and definitions of the women’s utopian fantasy. In recent years, the conditions of female reader’s lives, awareness and imagination have been changing rapidly. As a result, the female utopian fantasy has also changed significantly. Nevertheless, women’s lives in the real patriarchal system are still contradictory, and their adventurous imagination is spreading in alternative spaces such as the subculture. In this regard, the question is about the definition of romance and the meanings of romance research are still important task.
Janice A. Radway, Reading the Romance: Women, Patriarchy and Popular Literature, University of North Carolina Press, 2009.
리타 펠스키, 『페미니즘 이후의 문학』, 이은경 옮김, 여이연, 2010.
박은실, 「로맨스 자본주의: 소비주의와 사랑의 계급화」, 『여/성이론』 제28호, 2013, 32-58쪽.
손희정, 「여성이론가, 타니아 모들스키」, 『여/성이론』 제17호, 2007, 104-119쪽.
송승철, 「대중문화의 불온성 논쟁: 제니스 래드웨이의 문화연구의 고찰」, 『영미문학연구』 제1권, 2001, 1-14쪽.
송승철, 「이론과 문화연구: 양자의 갈등과 한국영문학의 좌표」, 『비평과 이론』 제11권 2호, 2006, 29-48쪽.
양석원, 「로맨스와 미국소설 비평, 역사와 상상력의 변증법」, 『근대 영미소설』 제5집 1호, 1988, 95-122쪽.
에바 일루즈, 『낭만적 유토피아와 소비하기: 사랑과 자본주의의 문화적 모순』, 박형신·권호현 옮김, 이학사, 2014.
유영종, 「미국문학의 로맨스소설 이론」, 『안과 밖』 제4권, 2003, 201-227쪽.
지그문트 바우만, 『리퀴드 러브: 현대의 우울과 고통의 원천에 대하여』, 권태우·조형준 옮김, 새물결, 2013.
질리안 비어, 『로망스』, 문우상 역, 서울대학교 출판부, 1982.
타니아 모들스키, 『여성 없는 페미니즘』, 노영숙 옮김, 여이연, 2008.
허버트 J. 갠스, 『대중문화와 고급문화』, 강헌두 역, 나남출판, 1998.
Ang, len, Watching Dallas: Soap Opera and the Melodramatic Imagination, London:Methuen, 1985.
Brunsdon, Charlotte, “Pedagogies of the feminine: feminist teaching and women’s genres”, Screen, 32-4, 1991, pp.364-381.
Coward, Rosalind, Fema1e Desire: How they are sought, bought and packaged, New York: Grove Press, 1984.
Melton, James Van Horn, The Rise of the Public in Enlightenment Europe, Cambridge University Press, 2001.
Modleski, Tania, Loving with a Vengeance: Mass Produced Fantasies for Women,New York: Rouledge, 1982.