바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

대중서사연구

  • P-ISSN1738-3188
  • E-ISSN2713-9964

An Archaeology of Cinema as a Real/Imaginary Narrative Medium

대중서사연구 / 대중서사연구, (P)1738-3188; (E)2713-9964
2019, v.25 no.4, pp.361-395
https://doi.org/10.18856/jpn.2019.25.4.012

Abstract

This paper take a media archaeological approach to cinema transformed into a narrative medium during its transitional period, 1903-1915. To accomplish this, I will explore the question of as which narrative medium cinema was imagined and also how it was institutionalized as a narrative medium with authorship. I will explain that the imaginary and real ideas and changes on cinema resonated with each other on the foundation of its technological aspects such as indexicality, 23 frames/sec. and montage. It was during the transitional period that cinema was transformed from a medium representing spectacle to a medium of narration. The establishment of the American film copyright law in 1912 was an institutional, real outcome from the contemporary understanding of cinema as a narrative medium. At the same time, various ideas emerged that led to imagining of cinema as a complete narrative medium, incomparable to any other. From a media archaeological perspective, the imaginary ideas of media resonate with their actual course of development. These imaginary ideas are not just imaginary, but rather reflect the contemporary desire for the medium. This paper looks into the transitional period based on this media archaeological point of view. To this end, this paper will briefly introduce the notion of media archaeology as a media theory and then discuss Eric Kluitenberg’s concept of ‘an archaeology of imaginary media’ and its methodologies. Second, it will explore literary and cinematic imagining of cinema as a powerful medium of storytelling, while discussing the ways in which cinema’s technological characteristics played a decisive role in these imaginings. Also to show the techno-deterministic role of cinema in the real world, this paper will explore how its technological characteristics were considered as an important element in the processes through which America’s first motion picture copyright was institutionalized in 1912 after two historical copyright cases: one is Edison v. Lubin in 1903 and Kalem v. Harper Brothers in 1909. Ultimately, this paper will lead us to an understanding of the history of cinema as a medium and its developments in more multi-layed way, as communication between the real and imaginary, and give us perspectives toward what cinema is.

keywords
미디어고고학, 상상적 미디어, 기술미디어 결정론, 영화, 영화 저작권, Media Archaeology, Imaginary Media, Technological Media Determinism, Cinema, Motion Picture Copyright

Reference

1.

프리드리히 키틀러, 『기록시스템 1800·1900』, 윤원화 역, 문학동네, 2015.

2.

프리드리히 키틀러, 『축음기, 영화, 타자기』, 유현주·김남시 역, 문학과지성사, 2019.

3.

Decherney, Peter, Hollywood’s Copyright Wars: From Edison to the Internet, New York: Columbia University Press, 2012.

4.

Ernst, Wolfgang & Jussi Parikka, Digital Memory and the Archive, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2012.

5.

Harry, Geduld, Authors on Film, Bloomington and London: Indiana University Press, 1972.

6.

Huhtamo, Erkki, “From Kaleidoscomaniac to Cybernerd: Notes Towards an Archaeology of Media”, Leonardo 30.3, 1997, pp.221-224.

7.

Huhtamo, Erkki & Jussi Parikka, Media Archaeology: Approaches, Applications, Implications, Berkeley: University of California Press, 2011.

8.

Kluitenberg, Erkki, “Second Introduction to an Archaeology of Imaginary Media”, Book of Imaginary Media: Excavating the Dream of the Ultimate Communication Medium, Rotterdam: NAi, 2006, pp.7-27.

9.

Milton, Aronson, “Motion Picture Copyright”, Washington University Law Quarterly, vol.25 no.4(January 1940), pp.554-572.

10.

Parikka, Jussi, What is Media Archaeology? London: Polity, 2012.

11.

Peter, Jaszi, “Copyright, Fair Use and Motion Pictures”, The Oxford Handbook of Film and Media Studies, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.

12.

Slide, Anthony, D. W. Griffith: Interviews, Jackson: University Press of Mississippi, 2012.

13.

Zielinski, Siegfried, Deep Time of the Media: Toward an Archaeology of Hearing and Seeing by Technical Means, Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 2006.

14.

베르나르트 디오니시우스 게오그헤간, 「키틀러 이후—최근 독일 미디어 이론으로서 문화기술학에 관하여」, 정찬철 역, 『문화과학』 94호, 2018, 236-260쪽. 원문 출처: Bernard Dionysius Geoghegan, “After Kittler: On the Cultural Techniques of Recent German Media Theory”, Theory, Culture & Society 30-6, 2013,

15.

브라이언 머천트, 『원 디바이스: 우리가 모르는 아이폰의 숨은 역사』, 정미진 역, 매일경제신문, 2017.

16.

블라디미르 나보코프, 『어둠 속의 웃음소리』, 정영목 역, 문학동네, 2016.

17.

제프리 노엘-스미스, 『옥스퍼드 세계영화사』, 이영아 외 역, 열린책들, 2006.

18.

Barker, Jennifer M., The Tactile Eye: Touch and the Cinematic Experience, Berkeley: University of California Press, 2009.

19.

Grieveson, Lee, Policing Cinema: Movies and Censorship in Early Twentieth Century America, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2004.

20.

Kracauer, Siegfried, Theory of Film: The Redemption of Physical Reality, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1997.

21.

Marzierska, Ewa, Nabokov’s Cinematic Afterlife, Jefferson: Macfarland, 2011.

22.

Musser, Charles, Before the Nickelodeon: Edwin S. Porter and the Edison Manufacturing Company, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991.

23.

Winthrop-Young, Geoffrey & N. Gane, “Friedrich Kittler: An Introduction”, Theory, Culture & Society, vol.23 no.7/8, 2006, pp.5-16.

대중서사연구