바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • KOREAN
  • P-ISSN2287-8327
  • E-ISSN2288-1220
  • SCOPUS, KCI

ISSN : 2287-8327

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.35 No.3

Citation Share

Association between coarse woody debris and small mammals and insectivores in managed forests

Journal of Ecology and Environment / Journal of Ecology and Environment, (P)2287-8327; (E)2288-1220
2012, v.35 no.3, pp.189-194

(2012). Association between coarse woody debris and small mammals and insectivores in managed forests. Journal of Ecology and Environment, 35(3), 189-194.

Abstract

Coarse woody debris (CWD) is generally considered dead woody material in various stages of forest decomposition and has been hypothesized to be an important habitat feature for mammals in forests of the Pacific Northwest, USA. Sherman and pitfall trapping were conducted for 2 years on three paired sites with low and high amounts of CWD. Deer mice was the dominant species with a total capture of 605 (45.6%). Four species of insectivores were captured, including Sorex moncicolus, S. trowbridgii, S. vagrans, and Neurotrichus gibbsii. A Poisson regression model was used to test whether 11CWD variables could predict insectivore captures. The volume of logs and mean decay were important variables for deer mice use of CWD. Mean distance from pieces of CWD to the capture point was significantly related to the total number of captures of trowbridge shrew (Sorex trowbridgii) and all insectivore species. Vagrant shrews (Sorex vagrans) were significantly associated with log volume. Retaining large size CWD should be part of a management plan for ground-dwelling insectivores in forests to secure their biodiversity.

keywords
community ecology, deer mice, insectivores, microhabitat, Poisson model

Reference

1.

Barnum SA, Manville CJ, Tester JR, Carmen WJ. 1992. Path selection by Peromyscus leucopus in the presence and absence of vegetative cover. J Mammal 73: 797-801.

2.

Carey AB, Harrington CA. 2001. Small mammals in young forests: implications for management for sustainability. For Ecol Manag 154: 289-309.

3.

Carey AB, Johnson ML. 1995. Small mammals in managed, naturally young, and old-growth forests. Ecol App 5: 336-352.

4.

Fitzerald VJ, Wolff JO. 1988. Behavioral responses of escaping Peromyscus leucopus to wet and dry substrata. J Mammal 69: 825-828.

5.

Greenberg CH. 2002. Response of white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus) to coarse woody debris and microsite use in southern Appalachian treefall gaps. For Ecol Manag 164: 57-66.

6.

Harmon ME, Franklin JF, Swanson FJ, Sollins P, Gregory SV, Lattin JD, Anderson NH, Cline SP, Aumen NG, Sedell JR, Lienkaemper GW, Cromack K Jr, Cummins KW. 1986. Ecology of coarse woody debris in temperate ecosystems. Adv Ecol Res 15: 133-302.

7.

Kim RH, Son Y, Lim JH, Lee IK, Seo KW, Koo JW, Noh NJ, Ryu SR, Hong SK, Ihm BS. 2006. Coarse woody debris mass and nutrients in forest ecosystems of Korea. Ecol Res 21: 819-827.

8.

Lee SD. 1995. Comparison of population characteristics of three species of shrews and the shrew-mole in habitats with different amounts of coarse woody debris. Acta Theriol 40: 415-424.

9.

Lee SD. 2004. Population dynamics and demography of deermice (Peromyscus maniculatus) in heterogeneous habitat : role of coarse woody debris. Pol J Ecol 52: 55-62.

10.

Loeb SC. 1999. Responses of small mammals to coarse woody debris in a southestern pine forest. J Mammal 80: 460-471

11.

Maser C, Anderson RG, Cromack K Jr, Williams JT, Martin RE. 1979. Dead and down woody material. In: Wildlife Habitats in Managed Forests: The Blue Mountains of Oregon and Washington. USDA Agricultural Handbook No. 553 (Thomas JW, ed). Wildlife Management Institute, Washington, DC, pp 78-95

12.

Morrison ML, Anthony RG. 1989. Habitat use by small mammals on early growth clear-cuttings in western Oregon. Can J Zool 67: 805-811.

13.

Owens AK, Moseley KR, McCay TS, Castleberry SB, Kilgo JC, Ford WM. 2008. Amphibian and reptile community response to coarse woody manipulations in upland loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) forests. For Ecol Manag 256: 2078-2083.

14.

Sollins P. 1982. Input and decay of coarse woody debris in coniferous stands in western Oregon and Washington. Can J For Res 12: 18-28.

15.

Spies TA, Franklin JF, Thomas TB. 1988. Coarse woody debris in Douglas-fir forests of western Oregon and Washington. Ecology 69: 1689-1702.

16.

Ucitel D, Christian DP, Graham JM. 2003. Vole use of coarse woody debris and implications for habitat and fuel management. J Wildl Manag 67: 65-72.

17.

West SD. 1991. Small mammal communities in the Southern Washington Cascade Range. In: Wildlife and Vegetation of Unmanaged Douglas-fir Forests. Genetical Technical Report PNW-GTR-285 (Ruggiero LF, Aubry KB, Carey AB, Huff MH, eds). US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR, pp 269-284.

18.

Yan E, Wang X, Huang J. 2006. Concept and classification of coarse woody debris in forest ecosystems. Front Biol China 1: 76-84.

19.

Zar JH. 1999. Biostatistical Analysis. 4th ed. Prentice Hill, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

Journal of Ecology and Environment

e-Submission OA Policy