바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Ecophysiological responses of Quercus gilva, endangered species and Q. glauca to long-term exposure to elevated CO2 concentration and temperature

Journal of Ecology and Environment / Journal of Ecology and Environment, (P)2287-8327; (E)2288-1220
2012, v.35 no.3, pp.203-212


  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

The physiological effects of elevated CO2 concentration and temperature were examined for Quercus gilva and Q. glauca grown under control (ambient CO2 and temperature) and treatment (elevated CO2 and temperature) conditions for 39months. The objective of the study was to measure the long-term responses, in physiological parameters, of two oaks species exposed to elevated CO2 and temperature. The photosynthetic rate of Q. gilva was found to be decreased, but that of Q. glauca was not significantly affected, after long-term exposure to elevated CO2 and temperature. Stomatal conductance of Q. glauca was reduced by 21.7%, but that of Q. gilva was not significantly affected, by long-term exposure to CO2and temperature. However, the transpiration rate of the two oak species decreased. Water use efficiency of Q. gilva was not significantly affected by elevated CO2 and temperature, while that of Q. glauca was increased by 56.6%. The leaves of Q. gilva grown under treatment conditions had an increased C:N ratio due to their reduced nitrogen content, while those of Q. glauca were not significantly affected by long-term exposure to elevated CO2 and temperature. These results suggest that the long-term responses to elevated CO2 and temperature between Q. gilva and Q. glauca are different, and that Q. gilva, the endangered species, is more sensitive to elevated CO2 and temperature than Q. glauca.

keywords
endemic plants, evergreen broad-leaved, global climate change, leaf nitrogen, photosynthesis, Quercus

Reference

1.

Adam NR, Wall GW, Kimball BA, Idso SB, Webber AN. 2004. Photosynthetic down-regulation over long-term CO2 enrichment in leaves of sour orange (Citrus aurantium) trees. New Phytol 163: 341-347.

2.

Ainsworth EA, Rogers A. 2007. The response of photosynthesis and stomatal conductance to rising [CO2]: mechanisms and environmental interactions. Plant Cell Environ 30: 258-270.

3.

Albert KR, Mikkelsen TN, Michelsen A, Ro-Poulsen H, van der Linden L. 2011. Interactive effects of drought, elevated CO2 and warming on photosynthetic capacity and photosystem performance in temperate heath plants. J Plant Physiol 68: 1550-1561.

4.

Chaturvedi AK, Vashistha RK, Rawat N, Prasad P, Nautiyal MC. 2009. Effect of CO2 enrichment on photosynthetic behavior of Podophyllum hexandrum Royle, an endangered medicinal herb. J Am Sci 5: 113-118.

5.

Choi EY, Seo TC, Lee SG, Cho IH, Stangoulis J. 2011. Growth and physiological responses of Chinese cabbage and radish to long-term exposure to elevated carbon dioxide and temperature. Hortic Environ Biotechnol 52: 376-386.

6.

Cotrufo MF, Ineson P, Scott A. 1998. Elevated CO2 reduces the nitrogen concentration of plant tissues. Glob Chang Biol 4: 43-54.

7.

Crous KY, Reich PB, Hunter MD, Ellsworth DS. 2010. Maintenance of leaf N controls the photosynthetic CO2 response of grassland species exposed to 9 years of free-air CO2 enrichment. Glob Chang Biol 16: 2076-2088.

8.

Crous KY, Walters MB, Ellsworth DS. 2008. Elevated CO2 concentration affects leaf photosynthesis–nitrogen relationships in Pinus taeda over nine years in FACE. Tree Physiol 28:607-614.

9.

Curtis PS. 1996. A meta-analysis of leaf gas exchange and nitrogen in trees grown under elevated carbon dioxide. Plant Cell Environ 19: 127-137.

10.

DeLucia EH, Sasek TW, Strain BR. 1985. Photosynthetic inhibition after long-term exposure to elevated levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide. Photosynth Res 7: 175-184.

11.

Faria T, Wilkins D, Besford RT, Vaz M, Pereira JS, Chaves MM. 1996. Growth at elevated CO2 leads to down-regulation of photosynthesis and altered response to high temperature in Quercus suber L. seedlings. J Exp Bot 47: 1755-1761.

12.

Herrick JD, Thomas RB. 2001. No photosynthetic down-regulation in sweetgum trees (Liquidambar styraciflua L.) after three years of CO2 enrichment at the Duke Forest FACE experiment. Plant Cell Environ 24: 53-64.

13.

Huxman TE, Hamerlynck EP, Loik ME, Smith SD. 1998. Gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence responses of three south-western Yucca species to elevated CO2 and high temperature. Plant cell Environ 21: 1275-1283.

14.

Hwangbo JK, Kwak YS. 2001. Effects of elevated CO2 and nitrogen on growth of Poa pratensis (L.). J Plant Biol 44: 12-16.

15.

Inauen N, Körner C, Hiltbrunner E. 2012. No growth stimulation by CO2 enrichment in alpine glacier forefield plants. Glob Chang Biol 18: 985-999.

16.

Iversen J. 1944. Viscum, Hedera and Ilex as climate indicators. Geol Foren Stockholm Forh 66: 463-483.

17.

Kanowski J. 2001. Effects of elevated CO2 on the foliar chemistry of seedlings of two rainforest trees from north-east Australia: implications for folivorous marsupials. Austral Ecol 26: 165-172.

18.

Kim HR, You YH. 2010a. Effects of elevated CO2 concentration and increased temperature on leaf related-physiological responses of Phytolacca insularis (native species) and Phytolacca americana (invasive species). J Ecol Field Biol 33: 195-204.

19.

Kim HR, You YH. 2010b. The effects of the elevated CO2 concentration and increased temperature on growth, yield and physiological responses of rice (Oryza sativa L. cv. Junam). Adv Biores 1: 46-50.

20.

Kimball BA, Idso SB. 2005. Long-term effects of elevated CO2 on sour orange trees. In: Plant Responses to Air Pollution and Global Change (Omasa K, Nouchi I, De Kok LJ, eds). Springer, Tokyo, pp 73-80.

21.

Koo KA, Kong WS, Kim CK. 2001. Distribution of evergreen broad-leaved plants and climatic factors. J Korean Geogr Soc 36: 247-257. (in Korean)

22.

Kuehny JS, Peet MM, Nelson PV, Willits DH. 1991. Nutrient dilution by starch in CO2-enriched Chrysanthemum. J Exp Bot 42: 711-716.

23.

Leakey ADB, Ainsworth EA, Bernacchi CJ, Rogers A, Long SP, Ort DR. 2009. Elevated CO2 effects on plant carbon, nitrogen, and water relations: six important lessons from FACE. J Exp Bot 60: 2859-2876.

24.

Liu F, Zhang M, Wang W, Chen S, Zheng J, Yang W, Hu F, An S. 2009. Photosynthesis in relation to leaf nitrogen, phosphorus and specific leaf area of seedlings and saplings in tropical montane rain forests of Hainan Island, south China. Front For China 4: 75-84.

25.

Long SP, Ainsworth EA, Rogers A, Ort DR. 2004. Rising atmospheric carbon dioxide: plants FACE the future. Annu Rev Plant Biol 55: 591-628.

26.

Norby RJ, Wullschleger SD, Gunderson CA, Johnson DW, Ceulemans R. 1999. Tree responses to rising CO2 in field experiments: implications for the future forest. Plant Cell Environ 22: 683-714.

27.

Nowak RS, Ellsworth DS, Smith SD. 2004. Functional responses of plants to elevated atmospheric CO2 : do photosynthetic and productivity data from FACE experiments support early predictions? New Phytol 162: 253-280.

28.

Parmesan C, Yohe G. 2003. A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421: 37-42.

29.

Peng SL, You WH, Zeng ZM, Wang LY. 2011. Effects of recent 60 years climate change on net primary productivity of evergreen broad-leaved forest in Tiantong region of Zhejiang Province. Chin J Ecol 30: 502-507.

30.

Roumet C, Garnier E, Suzor H, Salager JL, Roy J. 2000. Short and long-term responses of whole-plant gas exchange to elevated CO2 in four herbaceous species. Environ Exp Bot 43: 155-169.

31.

Shin DH, Kim HR, You YH. 2012. Effects of elevated CO2 concentration and increased temperature on the change of the phenological and reproductive characteristics of Phytolocca insularis, a Korea endemic plant. J Wet Res 14: 1-9.

32.

Smith SD, Monson RK, Anderson JE. 1997. Physiological Ecology of North American Desert Plants. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

33.

Springer CJ, Thomas RB. 2007. Photosynthetic responses of forest understory tree species to long-term exposure to elevated carbon carbon dioxide concentration at the Duke Forest FACE experiment. Tree Physiol 27: 25-32.

34.

Tissue DT, Thomas RB, Strain BR. 1993. Long-term effects of elevated CO2, and nutrients on photosynthesis and rubisco in loblolly pine seedlings. Plant Cell Environ 16: 859-865.

35.

Tissue DT, Thomas RB, Strain BR. 1997. Atmospheric CO2 enrichment increases growth and photosynthesis of Pinus taeda: a 4 year experiment in the field. Plant cell Environ 20: 1123-1134.

36.

Tjoelker MG, Oleksyn J, Reich PB. 1998. Seedlings of five boreal tree species differ in acclimation of net photosynthesis to elevated CO2 and temperature. Tree Physiol 18: 715-726.

37.

Valle R, Mishoe JW, Jones JW, Allen LH. 1984. Transpiration rate and water use efficiency of soybean leaves adapted to different CO2 environments. Crop Sci 25: 477-482.

38.

Walther GR. 2002. Weakening of climatic constraints with global warming and its consequences for evergreen broad-leaved species. Folia Geobot 37: 129-139.

39.

Walther GR, Carraro G, Klötzli F. 2001. Evergreen broadleaved species as indicators for climate change. In: “Fingerprints” of Climate Change: Adapted Behaviour and Shifting Species Ranges (Walther GR, Burga CA, Edwards PJ, eds). Kluwer Academic Plenum Publishers, New York, pp 151-162.

40.

Zhou YM, Wang CG, Han SJ, Cheng XB, Li MH, Fan AN, Wang XX. 2011. Species-specific and needle age-related responses of photosynthesis in two Pinus species to longterm exposure to elevated CO2 concentration. Trees 25: 163-173.

Journal of Ecology and Environment