ISSN : 2287-8327
It is very useful and important to see the status and change of necessary parts in a short period through selecting and observing the bioindicator continually to forecast and prepare the future. Especially, living things are so closely related to the environment that the indicator between the environment and living things shows close interrelationship. Also, the indicator related to environment provides information about representative or decisive environmental phenomenon and is used to simplify complicated facts. Considering wide range of background and application including various indica¬tors such as the change-, destruction-, pollution-, and restoration of habitats, climate change, and species diversity, the closest category includes “environmental indicator,” “ecological indicator,” and “biodiversity indicator.” The selection and use of bioindicator is complicated and difficult. The necessary conditions for the indicator selection are flexible and greatly depend on the goals of investigation such as the indicator for biological diversity investigation of specific area, the indicator for habitat destruction, the indicator for climate change, and the indicator for polluted area. It should meet many various conditions to select a good indicator. In this study, eleven selection standards are established based on domestic and overseas studies on bioindicator selection: species with clear classification and ecology, species distributed in geographically widespread area, species that show clear habitat characteristics, species that can provide early warning for a change, species that are easy and economically benefited for the investigation, species that have many independent individual groups and that is not greatly affected by the size of individual groups, species that is thought to represent the response of other species, species that represent the ecology change caused by the pressure of human influence, species for which researches on climate change have been done, species that is easy to observe, appears for a long time and forms a group with many individuals, and species that are important socially, economically, and culturally.
European Environment Agency (EEA). 1999. Information for Improving Europe’s Environment. Information EEA, Copenhagen.
Gerhardt A. 2002. Bioindicator species and their use in biomonitoring. In: Environmental Monitoring, Vol. 1 (Inyang HI, Daniels JL, eds). Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS), Oxford.
Holloway JD. 1980. Insect surveys-an approach to environmental monitoring. In: Atti XII Congresso Nazionale Italiano Entomologia [Proceedings of 12 National Italian Entomology Congress], Rome, 1980, pp 239-261.
Kremen C, Colwell RK, Erwin TL, Murphy DD, Noss RF, Sanjayan MA. 1993. Terrestrial arthropod assemblages: their use in conservation planning. Conserv Biol 7: 796-808.
McGeoch MA. 1998. The selection, testing and application of terrestrial insects as bioindicators. Biol Rev 73: 181-201.
National Institute of Biological Resources (NIBR). 2010. An Announcement of 100 Species Bioindicator Selection for National Climate Change. Ministry of Environment, Sejong-si. (in Korean)
Niemelä J. 2000. Biodiversity monitoring for decision-marking. Ann Zool Fennici 37: 307-317.
Noss RF. 1990. Indicators for monitoring biodiversity: a hierarchical approach. Conserv Biol 4: 355-364.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 1993. OECD Core Set of Indicators for Environmental Performance Reviews. OECD, Paris.
Pearson DL, Cassola F. 1992. World-wide species richness patterns of tiger beetles (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae): indicator taxon for biodiversity and conservation studies. Conserv Biol 6: 376-391.
Rosenberg DM, Danks HV, Lehmkuhl DM. 1986. Importance of insects in environmental impact assessment. Environ Manag 10: 773-783.
Smeets E, Weterings R. 1999. Environmental Indicators: Typology and Overview, Technical Report no 25. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen.
Spellerberg IF. 1993. Monitoring Ecological Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.