This study investigated the perceived significance of laboratory(lab) notebooks and the creation and maintenance of them from the perspectives of graduate students and professors in science fields. Semi-structured interviews of three professors and four graduate students were conducted. The interviewees were from three university laboratories of physics, chemistry and biological science. While professors perceived administrative continuity to be a reason for creating lab notebooks, students valued lab notebooks as a memory, and emphasized learning professional knowledge and skills through the recordkeeping practice. Students understood the ownership of lab notebooks and professors wanted to keep lab notebooks until they retire. Interviewees focused more on the content of lab notebooks rather than the form and the structure. They were also not willing to adopt an electronic lab notebook system. Students learned how to create lab notebooks through a course, their current or former academic advisors, seniors in the lab or well-written sample lab notebooks. In particular, students have learned how to create lab notebooks within their laboratories, which are considered to be communities of practice. In this sense, professors responsible for managing laboratories play an important part in teaching students the recordkeeping practice. University archives should also be more concerned with managing and preserving lab notebooks created from their universities.
교육과학기술부. (2009). 올바른 연구문화를 위한 연구노트 작성과 관리.
과학기술정책연구원. (2006). BT분야 혁신기반 실태분석 및 선진화 방안:과학기술정책연구원.
국가과학기술자문회의. (2006). 지식재산활용 극대화 방안 연구:국가과학기술자문회의.
김상준. (2008). 연구기록물 중 연구노트의 중요성과 관리 제도화. 정보관리연구, 39(2), 45-74.
부산대학교 산학협력단. 연구노트 사용자 매뉴얼.
김해도. (2006). 국가연구개발사업의 지적재산권 관리에 관한 연구.
노시경. 과학기술대학의 프로젝트 연구개발기록관리분석 - KAIST를 중심으로.
양진향. (2004). 질적 연구 방법론:이화여자대학교출판부.
최현옥. (2010). 우리나라 공과대학 연구실 연구기록의 체계적 관리 방안에 관한 연구. 한국기록관리학회지, 10(1), 119-139.
특허청. 전자연구노트 활성화를 위한 전자연구노트 인프라 구축 및 관련 법제도 개정방안 연구.
Duff, Wendy M.. (1998). Harnessing the Power of Warrant. American Archivist, 61(1), 88-105.
Gracy, Karen. (2004). Documenting Communities of Practice: Making the Case for Archival Ethnography. Archival Science, 4, 335-365.
Ilerbaig, Juan. (2010). Specimens as Records: Scientific Practices and Recordkeeping in Natural History Research. American Archivist, 73(2), 463-482.
Latour, Bruno. (1979). Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts:Princeton University Press.
Lave, Jean. (1991). Situating Learning in Communities of Practice, In Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition:American Psychological Association.
Shankar, Kalpana. (2004). Recordkeeping in the Production of Scientific Knowledge: An Ethnographic Study. Archival Science, 4, 367-382.
Shankar, Kalpana. (2007). Order from Chaos: The Poetics and Pragmatics of Scientific Recordkeeping. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(10), 1457-1466.
Shankar, Kalpana. (2009). Ambiguity and Legitimate Peripheral Participation in the Creation of Scientific Documents. Journal of Documentation, 65(1), 151-165.
Trace, Ciaran. (2002). What is Recorded is Never Simply ‘What Happened’: Record Keeping in Modern Organizational Culture. Archival Science, 2, 137-159.
Wickman, Chad. (2010). Writing Material in Chemical Physics Research: The Laboratory Notebook as Locus of Technical and Textual Integration. Written Communication, 27(3), 259-292.
Yakel, Elizabeth. (2001). The Social Construction of Accountability: Radiologists and Their Recordkeeping Practices. Information Society, 17(4), 233-245.
Yeo, Geoffrey. (2007). Concept of Records (1): Evidence, Information, and Persistent Representations. American Archivist, 70(2), 315-343.
Yeo, Geoffrey. (2007). Concept of Records(2): Prototypes and Boundary Objects. American Archivist, 71(1), 118-143.