- P-ISSN1598-1487
- E-ISSN2671-7247
Article Contents
- 2024 (Vol.24)
- 2023 (Vol.23)
- 2022 (Vol.22)
- 2021 (Vol.21)
- 2020 (Vol.20)
- 2019 (Vol.19)
- 2018 (Vol.18)
- 2017 (Vol.17)
- 2016 (Vol.16)
- 2015 (Vol.15)
- 2014 (Vol.14)
- 2013 (Vol.13)
- 2012 (Vol.12)
- 2011 (Vol.11)
- 2010 (Vol.10)
- 2009 (Vol.9)
- 2008 (Vol.8)
- 2007 (Vol.7)
- 2006 (Vol.6)
- 2005 (Vol.5)
- 2004 (Vol.4)
- 2003 (Vol.3)
- 2002 (Vol.2)
- 2001 (Vol.1)
A Study on Benefits of Digital Preservation of Research Data
Abstract
The study identifies benefits arising from the digital preservation of research data. Through analysing studies on digital preservation and digital research data in a economic perspective, broad benefits from digital preservation of research data have been identified and analysed quantitatively as well as qualitatively. It provides the starting point of systematic management and preservation of digital research data. Furthermore, it attempts modelling for investigating and producing benefits both in quantity and quality that is fundamental to promote investments.
- keywords
- 디지털 연구데이터, 디지털 보존, 보존 편익, digital research data, digital preservation, benefit
Reference
과학기술부. 국가연구개발사업 연구노트 관리지침.
김선태. (2010). 과학데이터 보존 및 활용모델에 관한 연구. 한국비블리아학회지, 21(4), 81-93.
생물학연구정보센터(BRIC). (2009). 연구실 실험데이터 관리 실태조사:SciON.
서울대학교. (2010). 서울대학교 연구윤리 지침:서울대학교.
Australian Government. (2007). Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research. http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/file/publications/synopses/r39.pdf.
Beagrie, Neil. (2008). Keeping research data safe: a cost model and guidance for UK universities. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/publications/keepingresearchdatasafe0408.pdf.
Beagrie, Neil. (2010). Keeping research data safe 2. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/publications/reports/2010/keepingresearchdatasafe2.pdf.
Currall, James. (2006). Investing in value: a perspective in digital preservation. D-Lib Magazine, 12(4), -.
Currall, James. (2007). Expressing project costs and benefits in a systematic way for investment in information and IT: espida Handbook. https://dspace.gla.ac.uk/bitstream/1905/691/1/espida_handbook_web.pdf.
Key Perspectives Ltd. (2010). Data dimensions: disciplinary differences in research data sharing, reuse and long term viability. SCARP Synthesis Study. Edinburgh: Digital Curation Centre. http://www.dcc.ac.uk/sites/default/files/documents/publications/SCARP-Synthesis.pdf.
Fry, Jenny. (2008). Identifying benefits arising from the curation and open sharing of research data produced within UK Higher Education and research institutes: exploring costs and benefits. JISC. http://ie-repository.jisc.ac.uk/279/2/JISC_data_sharing_finalreport.pdf.
Koski, Kimmo. (2009). Strategy for a European Data Infrastructure. http://www.csc.fi/english/pages/parade/whitepaper.
Lavoie, Brian F.. (2004). Of mice and memory: economically sustainable preservation for the twenty-first century. In Access in the Future Tense. Washington, D.C.: Council on Library & Information Resources. http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub126/lavoie.html.
Lavoie, Brian. (2004). Thirteen ways of looking at...digital preservation. D-Lib Magazine, 10(7/8). http://www.dlib.org/dlib/july04/lavoie/07lavoie.html.
Lyon, Liz. (2007). Dealing with Data: Roles, Rights, Responsibilities and Relationships. Consultancy Report. UKOLN. http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/ukoln/staff/e.j.lyon/reports/dealing_with_data_report-final.pdf.
National Academy of Science. (2009). Executive Summary, In Ensuring the Integrity, Accessibility, and Stewardship of Research Data in the Digital Age. Washington D.C.: The National Academies Press. http://www.nap.edu/html/12615/12615_EXS.pdf.
- Downloaded
- Viewed
- 0KCI Citations
- 0WOS Citations