바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN1598-1487
  • E-ISSN2671-7247

Democracy, Human Rights and the Function of Archives

Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management / Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, (P)1598-1487; (E)2671-7247
2009, v.9 no.2, pp.41-58
https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2009.9.2.041

Abstract

Historically the relation between the power and archives is inseparable. Archives are the recorded traces of political actions and an intention of power has a considerable effect on the existence of archives. In the democratic society the power serves people on the basis of the archives adopted as an evidence of political actions. Archives play an important role for the balance of power, which is a principle point of democracy. Considering the function and symbolism of archives, its proper and reasonable management is connected directly to the protection of people’s rights.

keywords
original order, boomerang effect, historical archives, democracy and archives, balance of power, reconciliation and the true, original order, boomerang effect, historical archives, democracy and archives, balance of power, reconciliation and the true, 원질서, 부메랑 효과, 역사기록물, 민주주의와 기록물, 권력과 기록물, 화해와 진실

Reference

1.

Block, D. Broadcast and Archive:Human Rights Documentation in the Early Digital Age. http://molodiez.org/dms420/hr_archives.htm.

2.

Bobbio, N. (1984). Il futuro della democrazia,una difesa delle regole del gioco:Einaudi.

3.

Bobbio,N. (1990). L'eta' dei diritti:Einaudi.

4.

Brutti, M. Disciplina degli archivi dei servizie riforma del segreto di Stato:SISSCO.

5.

Chigas,G. (2000). Building a Case Against the Khmer Rouge: Evidence from the Tuol Sleng and Santebal Archives. Harvard Asia Quarterly, 4(1), 44-49.

6.

Costa, P. (1989). Cittadinanza:Laterza.

7.

De Lutiis, G. (1996). Il lato oscuro del potere.Associazioni politiche e strutture paramilitari segrete dal 1946 a oggi:Editori Riuniti.

8.

Dewerpe, A. (1976). Espion:Gallimard.

9.

Fugueras, R. A. (2002). Archivese! Los Dcumentos del poder. El poder de los documentos. Alianza Editorial, 59, -.

10.

Giannulli,A. (2005). L'armadio della Repubblica:Nuova Iniziativa Editoriale.

11.

Gilbert,J. (2000). Access Denied: the Access to Information Act and its effect on public records. Archivaria, 49, 84-117.

12.

Harris, V. (2002). They Should Have Destroyed More. in Archives and the Public Good: Accountability and Records in Modern Society:The Destruction of Public Records.

13.

McDonald, L. (1998). Legal Matters, in International Council on Archives, Interdependence of Archives. Proceedings of the Twenty Ninth (-). Thirtieth and Thirty First International Conference of the Round Table on Archives. XXIX Mexico.

14.

McKemmish, S. Archivists at Risk: accountability and the role of the professional society. www.sims.monash.edu.au/research/rcrg/publications/archive1.html.

15.

McKinnon,S. (1994). The Sports Rorts Affair: A Case Study in Recordkeeping,Accountability and Media Reporting. New Zealand Archivist, 4, 1-5.

16.

Noguères,H. (1984). La Vie quotidienne des résistants de l'armistice à la liberation,Paris:Hachette,26,cit.,in A.Dewerpe,Espion.142. Hachette, 26, -.

17.

Pisa,P. (1978). Le premesse ‘sostanziali' della normativa sul segreto di Stato in Segreto di Stato egiustizia penale:Zanichelli.

18.

Quintana,A.G. (1998). Archives of the Security Services of Former Repressive Regimes. Report prepared for UNESCO on behalf of the International Council Archives.

19.

Quintana,A.G. (2004). Los archives de la represión: balance y perspectiva. Comma, 2, 59-74.

20.

Salvi,G. (1998). Occulto e illegale. La gestione degli archivi e il controllo di legalita'. Studi storici, XXXIX, 1048-1057.

21.

Sofri,A. (1991). L'ombra di Moro:Sellerio.

22.

Theoharis,A.G. (1998). A Culture of Secrecy. The Government versus the people's Right to Know:University Press of Kansas.

23.

Wallace,D.A. Impausible Deniability:The Politics of Documents in the Iran Contra Affair,Archives and the Public Good:Accountability and Records in Modern Society,ed.

24.

Richard J. Cox. .

25.

Wiener,J. (1998). National Securty and Freedom of Information: The John Lennon FBI Files, in A Culture of Secrecy: The Government Versus the People's Right to Know:University Press of Kansas.

26.

Zelinski, B. La Mémoire unifiée? L'héitage équivoque des archives de la RDA. Vintième siècle. Revue d'histoire. www.persee.fr.

27.

De Felice,F. (1989). Doppia lealta' e doppio stato. Studi storici, XXX(3), 493-563.

28.

Foucault, M. (1976). Sorvegliare e punire.Nascita della prigione:Einaudi.

Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management