바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

The impact of CSR related information on brand attitude: Based on the moderating effect of brand concept and attitude certainty

Abstract

This study examines how the impact of corporate social responsibility (CSR) related information on brand attitude depends on brand concept and attitude certainty. We proposed two brand concepts that may influence the impact of CSR related information on brand attitude: (1) self-enhancement brand concept and (2) self-transcendence brand concept. We used positive and negative newspaper articles as stimuli in order to manipulate CSR related information. The dependent variable was calculated by subtracting brand attitude before exposure to stimuli from brand attitude after exposure to stimuli. The results of this study suggest that the impact of negative CSR related information depends on brand concept. Specifically, the attitude change of self-transcendence brand through negative CSR related information was greater than self-enhancement brand. Furthermore, the impact of CSR related information on brand attitude depends on brand concept and attitude certainty. In case of self-enhancement brand, positive CSR related information makes a more negative change in the brand attitude when attitude certainty is high than when it is low. In contrast, negative CSR related information about self-enhancement brand makes a more negative change in the brand attitude when attitude certainty is low than when it is high. However, in case of self-transcendence brand, the impact of positive and negative CSR related information on brand attitude does not depend on attitude certainty. Based on the results of this study, we suggested theoretical and practical implications about CSR activities and crises.

keywords
CSR, Brand concept, Attitude certainty, CSR

Reference

1.

도선재, 전주언, 문영준 (2009). 브랜드확장의적합성에 따른 시간적 거리의 제시 효과:브랜드컨셉과 브랜드 친숙성을 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 소비자광고, 10(1), 79-99.

2.

박태희 (2013. 07. 25). 기업 사회공헌활동, 소비자 구매에 영향 준다. 중앙일보, B4.

3.

윤 각, 서상희 (2003). 인터랙티브 TV 광고와일반 광고에서 인센티브와 관여도가 광고인지반응에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 광고학연구, 16(5), 7-26.

4.

이희정, 강명수 (2013). 부정적 사건 발생이 소비자-브랜드 관계와 브랜드 태도에 미치는 영향: 소비자 손실 및 회복 노력 유형과 브랜드 성격을 중심으로. 소비문화연구, 16(3), 147-167.

5.

전국경제인연합회 (2013). 우리 기업의 사회공헌 현주소. 월간 전경련, 12월 호, 8-17.

6.

전성률, 주태욱, 김경호, 박준형 (2011). 브랜드위기의 유형이 브랜드 태도에 미치는 부정적 영향에 관한 연구. 마케팅연구, 26(2), 25-44.

7.

최자영, 최윤식 (2011). 자기조절초점에 따른공익연계 마케팅(CRM) 광고가 제품태도에미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 한국심리학회지: 소비자광고, 12(1), 1-25.

8.

Becker-Olsen, K. L., Cudmore, B. A., & Hill, R. P. (2006). The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior. Journal of Business Research, 59(1), 46-53.

9.

Berger, I. E., & Mitchell, A. A. (1989). The Effect of Advertising on Attitude Accessibility, Attitude Confidence, and the Attitude-Behavior Relationship. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(3), 269-279.

10.

Bowen, H. R. (1953) Social responsibilities of the businessman. NewYork: Harper & Row.

11.

Britt, T. W., Millard, M. R., Sundareswaran, P. T., & Moore, D. (2009). Personality Variables Predict Strength-Related Attitude Dimensions Across Objects. Journal of Personality, 77(3), 859-882.

12.

Brown, T. J., & Dacin, P. A. (1997). The Company and the Product: Corporate Associations and Consumer Product Responses. Journal of Marketing, 61(1), 68-84.

13.

Chartrand, T. L., Huber, J., Shiv, B., & Tanner, R. J. (2008). Nonconscious Goals and Consumer Choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(2), 189-201.

14.

Cheng, S. Y., White, T. B., & Chaplin, L. N. (2012). The effects of self-brand connections on responses to brand failure: A new look at the consumer-brand relationship. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(2), 280-288.

15.

Davies, I., Lee, Z., & Ahonkhai, I. (2012). Do Consumers Care About Ethical-Luxury?. Journal of Business Ethics, 106(1), 37-51.

16.

Davis, K. (1973). The Case for and Against Business Assumption of Social Responsibilities. Academy of Management Journal, 16(2), 312-322.

17.

Dean, D. H. (2004). Consumer Reaction to Negative Publicity. Journal of Business Communication, 41(2), 192-211.

18.

Donaldson, L., & Davis, J. H. (1991). Stewardship Theory or Agency Theory: CEO Governance and Shareholder Returns. Australian Journal of Management, 16(1), 49-65.

19.

Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2007). Reaping relational rewards from corporate social responsibility: The role of competitive positioning. International Journal of Research In Marketing, 24(3), 224-241.

20.

Eisingerich, A. B., Rubera, G. M. & Bhardwaj, G. (2011). Doing Good and Doing Better despite Negative Information? The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in Consumer Resistance to Negative Information. Journal of Service Research, 14(1), 60-75.

21.

Fazio, R. H., Zanna, M. P., & Cooper, J. (1978). Direct Experience and Attitude-Behavior Consistency: An Information Processing Analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4(1), 48-51.

22.

Fazio, R. H., Powell, M. C., & Williams, C. J. (1989). The Role of Attitude Accessibility in the Attitude-to-Behavior Process. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(3), 280-288.

23.

Frederick, W. C. (1986). Toward CSR[sub3]: Why Ethical Analysis is Indispensable and Unavoidable in Corporate Affairs. California Management Review, 28(2), 126-141.

24.

Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine, September, 13.

25.

Henard, D. H. (2002). Negative Publicity: What Companies Need to Know About Public Relations. Public Relations Quarterly, 47(4), 8-12.

26.

Holland, R. W., Verplanken, B., & van Knippenberg, A. (2003). From repetition to conviction: Attitude accessibility as a determinant of attitude certainty. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(6), 594-601.

27.

Horcajo, J., Petty, R. E., & Briñol, P. (2010). The Effects of Majority Versus Minority Source Status on Persuasion: A Self-Validation Analysis. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 99(3), 498-512.

28.

Klein, J., & Dawar, N. (2004). Corporate social responsibility and consumers' attributions and brand evaluations in a product-harm crisis. International Journal of Research In Marketing, 21(3), 203-217.

29.

Krishnan, H. S., & Smith, R. E. (1998). The Relative Endurance of Attitudes, Confidence, and Attitude-Behavior Consistency: The Role of Information Source and Delay. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7(3), 273-298.

30.

Lin, C., Chen, S., Chiu, C., & Lee, W. (2011). Understanding Purchase Intention During Product-Harm Crises: Moderating Effects of Perceived Corporate Ability and Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(3), 455-471.

31.

Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility, Customer Satisfaction, and Market Value. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 1-18.

32.

Maheswaran, D., & Meyers-Levy, J. (1990). The Influence of Message Framing and Issue Involvement. Journal of Marketing Research, 27(3), 361-367.

33.

Marcus, A. A., & Goodman, R. S. (1991). Victims and Shareholders: The Dilemmas of Presenting Corporate Policy During a Crisis. Academy of Management Journal, 34(2), 281-305.

34.

Mohr, L. A., Webb, D. J., & Harris, K. E. (2001). Do Consumers Expect Companies to be Socially Responsible? The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Buying Behavior. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 35(1), 45-59.

35.

Park, C. W., Milberg, S., & Lawson, R. (1991). Evaluation of Brand Extensions: The Role of Product Feature Similarity and Brand Concept Consistency. Journal of Consumer Research, 18(2), 185-193.

36.

Perera, L. R., & Chaminda, J. D. (2013). Corporate Social Responsibility and Product Evaluation: The Moderating Role of Brand Familiarity. Corporate Social Responsibility &Environmental Management, 20(4), 245-256.

37.

Petrocelli, J. V., Tormala, Z. L., & Rucker, D. D. (2007). Unpacking Attitude Certainty:Attitude Clarity and Attitude Correctness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(1), 30-41.

38.

Petty, R. E., Briñol, P., & Tormala, Z. L. (2002). Thought Confidence as a Determinant of Persuasion: The Self-Validation Hypothesis. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 82(5), 722-741.

39.

Pullig, Chris, Richard G. Netemeyer, and Abhijit Biswas (2006). “Attitude Basis, Certainty, and Challenge Alignment: A Case of Negative Brand Publicity,” Journal of The Academy of Marketing Science, 34(4), 528-542.

40.

Rucker, D. D., & Petty, R. E. (2004). When Resistance Is Futile: Consequences of Failed Counterarguing for Attitude Certainty. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 86(2), 219-235.

41.

Rucker, D. D., Tormala, Z. L., Petty, R. E., & Briñol, P. (2014). Consumer conviction and commitment: An appraisal-based framework for attitude certainty. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(1), 119-136.

42.

Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, ed. Mark P. Zanna, San Diego, CA:Academic Press, 1-65.

43.

Seeger, M. W., Sellnow, T. L., & Ulmer, R. R. (2012). 6 Communication, Organization, and Crisis. Communication yearbook, 21, 231-275.

44.

Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001). Does Doing Good Always Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 225-243.

45.

Shrivastava, P., & Mitroff, I. I. (1987). Strategic Management of Corporate Crises. Columbia Journal of World Business, 22(1), 5-11.

46.

Smith, S. M., Fabrigar, L. R., MacDougall, B. L., & Wiesenthal, N. L. (2008). The role of amount, cognitive elaboration, and structural consistency of attitude-relevant knowledge in the formation of attitude certainty. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(2), 280-295.

47.

Sohn, Y. J., & Lariscy, R. W. (2014). Understanding Reputational Crisis: Definition, Properties, and Consequences. Journal of Public Relations Research, 26(1), 23-43.

48.

Torelli, C. J., Monga, A. B., & Kaikati, A. M. (2012). Doing Poorly by Doing Good:Corporate Social Responsibility and Brand Concepts. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(5), 948-963.

49.

Tormala, Z. L., & Rucker, D. D. (2007). Attitude Certainty: A Review of Past Findings and Emerging Perspectives. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1(1), 469-492.

50.

Tormala, Z. L., and Petty, R. E. (2002). What doesn't kill me makes me stronger: The effects of resisting persuasion on attitude certainty. Journal of personality and social psychology, 83(6), 1298-1313.

51.

Ulmer, R. R., & Sellnow, T. L. (2000). Consistent questions of ambiguity in organizational crisis communication: Jack in the Box as a case study. Journal of Business Ethics, 25(2), 143-155.

52.

Varadarajan, P. R., & Menon, A. (1988). Cause-Related Marketing: A Coalignment of Marketing Strategy and Corporate Philanthropy. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 58-74.

53.

Wan, E. W., & Rucker, D. D. (2013). Confidence and Construal Framing: When Confidence Increases versus Decreases Information Processing. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(1), 977-992.

54.

Webb, D. J., & Mohr, L. A. (1998). A Typology of Consumer Responses to Cause-Related Marketing: From Skeptics to Socially Concerned. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 17(2), 226-238.

55.

Weinberger, M. G., & Lepkowska-White, E. (2000). The influence of negative information on purchase behaviour. Journal of Marketing Management, 16(5), 465-481.

56.

Yoon, Y., Gürhan-Canli, Z., & Schwarz, N. (2006). The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Activities on Companies With Bad Reputations. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(4), 377-390.

logo