바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

PPL Advertising Effects of the Types of Product Placement and Exposure time

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of the different types of product placement and exposure time of PPL on brand recognition and brand attitude. In addition, we hypothesized that the types of product placement and exposure time will have interaction effect on brand recognition and brand attitude. To achieve this goal, the experiment was designed by 3 single exposure times (low/medium/high) x 2 types of product placements (on-set placement/creative placement) within subject factor. The total of 133 undergraduate students were recruited and asked to watch movie and then to answer questions about the brand recognition and brand attitude. The results of this study were as follows. First, the on-set placement had higher effect than the creative placement did on brand recognition. Second, the degree of single exposure time of PPL had positive effect on brand recognition, and the high condition(9-12 sec.) of single exposure time of PPL had higher effect than the low condition(1-4 sec.). Third, there was no interaction effects between the types of product placement and single exposure time on brand recognition. On the other hand, there was a significant interaction effect between the types of product placement and single exposure time on brand attitude. In the case of creative placement, the attitude toward placed brand had higher tendency when single exposure time of PPL was presented longer. However, in the case of on-set placement, the medium condition of single exposure time of PPL produced a higher brand attitude than the low condition or high condition did towards placed brand. These results suggest that exposure time of PPL may represent an important variable on PPL and indicate that the appropriate level of exposure time is different in terms of product placement type.

keywords
PPL, types of product placement, exposure time, brand recognition, brand attitude

Reference

1.

강현정 (2006). 영화 속 PPL 효과에 영향을 주는 변인 및 효율적인 운용. 숙명여자대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문.

2.

김미정 (2008). TV 드라마의 제품배치가 소비자의 브랜드 회상과 태도에 미치는 영향에 미치는 영향. 단국대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문.

3.

김봉현, 김재휘, 송정미, 탁진영 (2002). 방송에서의 제품 삽입 및 간접광고(PPL)의 현황 인식 및 기준에 대한 연구. 한국광고학회.

4.

김영배 (2013). 기업 커뮤니케이션에서 PPL배치유형과 노출정도가 소비자반응에 미치는 영향. 홍익대학교 대학원 박사학위 논문.

5.

문화체육관광부 (2014. 11.27) ‘2014 광고산업통계조사’ 결과발표. http://www.mcst.go.kr/ web/ s_notice/press/pressView.jsp?Seq=13907.

6.

박은아, 양윤 (2013). 노출빈도와 선험 브랜드태도에 따른 간접광고(PPL)효과. 한국심리학회지: 소비자․광고, 14(3), 507-531.

7.

부경희, 박천규, 손정식 (2015). 긴 광고가 뭔가 달라요: 15’, 30’, 60’ 광고의 제작기법 비교연구. 광고학연구, 26(6), 31-65.

8.

송민영 (2003). 마케팅 PR 전략인 제품배치(PPL)의 효과 연구. 숙명여자대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문.

9.

양윤, 성충모 (2001). 영화에서의 PPL 광고효과 측정. 광고연구, 53(2), 135-154.

10.

원아름 (2015). 미혼남녀의 결혼의향과 결혼가치관에 영향을 미치는 변인 연구. 중앙대학교 석사학위 논문.

11.

유승엽, 김진희 (2011). 제품관여와 배치형태 및 노출유형이 광고 속 PPL 효과에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 소비자․광고, 12(4), 713-735.

12.

이유재, 최우진 (2004). 제품배치(PPL)가 소비자의 브랜드 회상과 태도에 미치는 영향: 관여도와 PPL 관련 사전정보 인지여부의 조절적 역할. 광고학연구, 15(3), 91-112.

13.

정민정 (2003). 영화 속에 삽입된 PPL 효과에 관한 실증적 연구. 연세대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문.

14.

신수연, 홍정민 (2007). 국내 영화 속 패션제품의 PPL 커뮤니케이션 효과: 배치유형과 노출시간을 중심으로. 복식문화연구, 15(1), 13-24.

15.

한국방송광고진흥공사 (2012. 2. 16). 지상파 간접광고(PPL), 시청자 3명 중 1명이 기억. http://www.kobaco.co.kr/kobaco/kobaconews/kobaconotice_read.asp?news_no=178&Cnt139.

16.

Babin, L. A., & Carder, S. T. (1996). Viewer’s recognition of brands placed within a film. International Journal of Advertising, 15(2), 140-151.

17.

Balasubramanian, S. K. (1994). Beyond advertising and publicity: hybrid messages and public policy issues. Journal of Advertising, 15(2), 140-151.

18.

Balasubramanian, S, K., Karrh, J, A., & Patwardhan H. (2006). Audience response to product placements: an integrative framework and future research agenda. Journal of Advertising, 35(3), 115-141.

19.

Berlyne, D. E. (1970). Novelty, complexity, and hedonic value. Perception & Psychophysics, 8(5), 279-286.

20.

Brennan, I., Dubas, K. M., & Babin, L. A. (1999). The influence of product-placement type & exposure time on product-placement recognition. International Journal of Advertising, 18, 323-338.

21.

Chan, Fanny F. Y. (2012). Product placement and its effectiveness: a systematic review and propositions for future research. The Marketing Review, 12(1), 39-60.

22.

Cowley, E., & Barron, C. (2008). When product placement goes wrong: the effects of program liking and placement prominence. Journal of Advertising, 37(1), 89-98.

23.

d’Astous, A., & Chartier, F. (2000). A study of factors affecting consumer evaluations and memory of product placements in movies. Journal of Current Issue and Research in Advertising, 22(2), 31-40.

24.

Gupta, P. B., & Gould, S. J. (1997). Consumers' perceptions of the ethics and acceptability of product placements in movies: product category and individual differences. Journal of Current Issue and Research in Advertising, 19(1), 37-50.

25.

Gupta, P. B., & Lord, K. R. (1998). Product placement in movies: the effect of prominence and mode on audience recall, Journal of Current Issue and Research in Advertising, 20(1), 47-59.

26.

Homer, P, M. (2009). Product placements. Journal of Advertising, 38(3), 21-31.

27.

Krugman, H. E. (1965). The impact of television advertising: learning without involvement. Public Opinion Quarterly, 29(3), 349-356.

28.

Lehu, J. M., & Bressoud, E. (2009). recall of brand placement in movies: interactions between prominence and plot connection in real conditions or exposure. Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 24(1), 7-26.

29.

McCarty, J. A. (2004). Product placement: the nature of the practice and potential avenues of inquiry. in L.J. Shrum (Ed.), The Psychology of Entertainment Media(pp. 45-61). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

30.

Russell, C. A. (1998). Toward a framework of product placement: theoretical proposition. Advances in Consumer Research, 25(1), 357-362.

31.

Singh, S. N., &. Cole, C. A. (1993) The effects of length, content, and repetition on television commercial effectiveness. Journal of Marketing Communications, 30(1), 91-104.

32.

Sawyer, A. (2006). Possible psychological processes underlying the effectiveness of brand placements. International Journal of Advertising, 25(1), 110-112.

33.

Van Reijmersdal, E. (2009). Brand placement prominence: good for memory! bad for attitudes? Journal of Advertising, 49(2), 151- 153.

34.

Tellis, G. J. (1998). Advertising and sales promotion strategy. Reading, MA: Addtion-Wesley.

35.

Yang, M., & Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R. (2007). The effectiveness of brand placements in the movies: levels of placements, explicit and implicit memory, and brand choice behavior. Journal of Communication, 57(3), 469-489.

logo