바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

The influence of product placement in negative context on store recall and attitude according to cognitive styles

Abstract

In the study, an experiment design was a two-way mixed factorial design of 2(placement style: external/internal) × 2(cognitive style: analytic/holistic), placement style was a within-subject variable. Both placement style in a negative context and cognitive style were independent variables, store recall and store attitude were dependent variables. The findings showed that there were main effects and interaction effects on store recall and attitude when placement style and cognition style were changed. In an external store recall, analytic persons got a high score than holistic persons but there was no difference between two groups in terms of internal recall. Besides, attitude was changed as placement style in two groups and all participants gave above median value in external placement. The major research finding suggests that external placements unrelated negative events can be useful in one of real product placement styles.

keywords
PPL, negative context, placement style, cognitive style, recall, attitude

Reference

1.

매일경제 (2012. 8. 31). 영화속 간접광고(PPL) 부쩍 늘어난 이유는. A20면.

2.

유승엽, 김진희 (2011). 제품관여와 배치형태 및 노출유형이 광고 속 PPL 효과에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 소비자․광고, 12(4), 713-735.

3.

이유재, 최우진 (2004). 제품배치(PPL)가 소비자의 브랜드 회상과 태도에 미치는 영향: 관여도와 PPL관련 사전정보 인지여부의 조절적 역할, 광고학연구, 15(3), 91-112.

4.

최문정, 정동열 (2013). 장독립-장의존 인지양식이 대학생의 정보탐색행위에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 47(1), 125-147.

5.

Babin, L. A., & Carder, S. T. (1996). Viewers' recognition of brands placed within film, International journal of advertising, 15(2), 140-151.

6.

Bandura, A. (2002). Selective moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Moral Education, 31(2), 101-119

7.

Bornstein, R. F. (1989). Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968-1987. Psychological Bulletin, 106(2), 265-289.

8.

Choi, I., Dalal, R., Kim-Prieto, C., & Park, H. (2003). Culture and judgment of causal relevance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 46-59.

9.

Choi, I., Koo, M., & Choi, J. A. (2007). Individual differences in analytic versus holistic thinking, Society for Personality and Social Psychology, 33(5), 691-705.

10.

Ford, N., Miller, D., & Moss, N. (2005). Web search strategies and human individual differences: Cognitive and demographic factors, internet attitudes, and approaches. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(7), 741-756.

11.

Friestad, M., & Wright, P. (1994). The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 1-31.

12.

Gupta, P. B., Pola, B., & Lord, K. R. (1998). Product placement in movies: The effect of prominence and mode on audience recall, Journal of current issues and research in advertising, 20(1), 47-59.

13.

Ji, L., Peng, K., & Nisbett, R. E. (2000). Culture, control, and perception of relationships in the environment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(5), 943-955.

14.

Karrh, J. A. (1994). Effects of brand placement in motion pictures, In C.S. Madden(Ed), Proceeding of the 1995 Conference of the american academy of advertising, 182-188.

15.

Krakowiak, K., & Oliver, M. (2012). When good characters do bad things: Examining the effect of moral ambiguity on enjoyment, Journal Of Communication, 62(1), 117-135.

16.

Krakowiak, K. M., & Tsay-Vogel, M. (2013). What makes character’s bad behaviors acceptable? The effect of character motivation and outcome on perceptions, character liking, and moral disengagement, Mass Communication and Society, 16(2), 179-199.

17.

Kurian, G., Sharma, N. K., & Santhakumari, K. (1987). Cognitive strategies in kohs block design test performance: A preliminary report. Psychological Studies, 32(1), 29-32.

18.

Law, S., & Braun, K. A. (2000). I’ll have what she’s having: Gauging the impact of product placements on viewers. Psychology and Marketing, 17(12), 1059-1075.

19.

Lerch, C. S., & Blick, K. A. (1983). Field dependence as a factor in eyewitness accounts. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 57(2), 558.

20.

Masuda, T., & Nisbett, R. E. (2001). Attending holistically versus analytically: Comparing the context sensitivity of Japanese and Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(5), 992-934.

21.

Morris, M. W., & Peng, K. (1994). Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 949-971.

22.

Matthes, J., Wirth, W., Schemer, C., & Kissling, A. K. (2011). I see what you don’t see: The role of individual differences in field dependence-independence as a predictor of product placement recall and brand liking, Journal of Advertising, 40(4), 85-99.

23.

Nebanzahl, I. D., & Secunda, E. (1993). Consumer’s attitude toward product placement in movies. International Journal of Advertising, 12(1), 1-11.

24.

Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, New York: Academic Press, 123-205.

25.

Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Schumann, D. (1983). Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(2), 135-146.

26.

Raney, A. A. (2004). Expanding disposition theory: Reconsidering character liking, moral evaluations, and enjoyment. Communication Theory, 14(4), 348-369.

27.

Redker, C., Gibson, B., & Zimmerman, I. (2013). Liking of movie genre alters the effectiveness of background product placements, Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 35(3), 249-255.

28.

Redondo, I. (2012). The behavioral effects of negative product placements in movies, Psychology & Marketing, 29(8), 622-635.

29.

Riding, R. J. (1997). On the nature of cognitive style. Educational Psychology, 17 (1-2), 29-49.

30.

Riding, R. J., & Cheema, I. (1991). Cognitive styles: An overview and integration. Educational Psychology, 11(3-4), 193-215.

31.

Russell, C. A. (2002). Investigating the effectiveness of product placements in television shows: The role of modality and plot connection congruence on brand memory and attitude, Journal of Consumer Research, 29(3), 306-318.

32.

Shen, F., & Chen, Q. (2007). Contextual priming and applicability: Implications for ad attitude and brand evaluations. Journal of Advertising, 36(1), 69-80.

33.

Storm, B. C., & Stoller, E. (2014). Exposure to product placement in text can influence consumer judgments, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 29(1), 20-31.

34.

Tsay, M., & Krakowiak, K. M. (2011). The impact of perceived character similarity and identification on moral disengagement. International Journal of Arts and Technology, 4(1), 102-110.

35.

Witkin, H. A. (1950). Individual differences in ease of perception of embedded figures. Journal of Personality, 19(1), 1-15.

36.

Witkin, H. A., Dyk, R. B., Faterson, H. F., Goodenough, D. R., & Karp, S. A. (1974). Psychological differentiation. Potomac, MD: Lawrence Erlbaum.

37.

Yi, Y. (1990). Cognitive and affective priming effects of the context for print advertisements. Journal of Advertising, 19(2), 40-48.

38.

Yi, Y. (1993). Contextual priming effects in print advertisements: The moderating role of prior knowledge. Journal of Advertising. 22(1), 1-10.

39.

Yoon, S., Choi, Y. K., & Song, S. (2011). When intrusive can be likable product placement effects on multitasking consumers. Journal of Advertising, 40(2), 63-75.

40.

Zillmann, D. (2000). Basal morality in drama appreciation. In I. Bondebjerg (Ed.), Moving images, culture, and the mind (pp. 53-63). Luton, UK: University of Luton Press.

logo