open access
메뉴ISSN : 1229-8778
To investigate the role of consumers’ cognitive load in online media environments, the current study seeks to investigate the effects of cognitive load, ad-content congruity, and ad placement on the effectiveness of online video advertising. Findings of the study reveal that there is a main effect of cognitive load on brand and ad recall. While there is a main effect of ad-content congruity on ad recall, the effect is shown to be only significant in the high cognitive load condition. However, the effect of ad-content congruity on brand recall is only significant when cognitive load is low. When video ad is placed between content (mid-roll ad placement), brand and ad recall is reported higher than when ad is placed prior to the content (pre-roll ad placement). Results show that the effect of ad-content congruity on ad recall is only significant in the mid-roll ad placement condition.
김유승, & 도선재. (2019). 온라인 동영상 광고와 클립 영상의 맥락 일치성이 광고 효과에 미치는 영향. 광고학연구, 30, 137-158.
김재휘, & 김용환. (2003). 인터넷광고의 침입성과 관여가 광고효과에 미치는 영향. 광고연구, (60), 7-35.
서희정, 김류원, & 정세훈. (2018). 온라인 동영상 광고의 강제노출이 광고태도에 미치는 영향: 맥락일치성에 따른 심리적 반발의 조절된 매개효과. 광고학연구, 29(4), 73-93.
안서원. (2017). 온라인 동영상 사전광고에 대한 소비자 반응: 스킵 여부와 스킵 시점, 중간 광고와의 비교. 광고학연구, 28(7), 29-45.
최인규, & 한상필. (2008). 모바일 광고회피행동에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구. 한국심리학회지: 소비자․광고, 9(3), 523- 547.
홍종필, & 이영아. (2010). TV 프로그램 전후/중간광고 포맷과 프로그램 관여도에 따른 광고효과에 관한 연구. 한국심리학회지: 소비자․광고, 11(3), 553-577.
Abele, A. (1985). Thinking about thinking: Causal, evaluative and finalistic cognitions about social situations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15(3), 315-332.
Anderson, R. C. (1978). Schema-directed processes in language comprehension. In Cognitive psychology and instruction (pp. 67-82). Springer, Boston, MA.
Annie, L., & Basil, M. D. (1998). Attention, resource allocation, and communication research: What do secondary task reaction times measure, anyway?. Annals of the International Communication Association, 21(1), 443-458.
Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. Psychology of learning and motivation, 2(4), 89-195.
Barden, J., & Petty, R. E. (2008). The mere perception of elaboration creates attitude certainty: Exploring the thoughtfulness heuristic. Journal of personality and social psychology, 95(3), 489.
Barden, J., & Tormala, Z. L. (2014). Elaboration and attitude strength: The new meta‐cognitive perspective. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8(1), 17-29.
Batra, R., & Ahtola, O. (1990). Sources of the hedonic and utilitarian measuring attitudes consumer. Consumer Attitudes, 2(2), 159-170.
Berger, J., & Fitzsimons, G. (2008). Dogs on the street, pumas on your feet: How cues in the environment influence product evaluation and choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(1), 1-14.
Bohner, G., Bless, H., Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (1988). What triggers causal attributions? The impact of valence and subjective probability. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18(4), 335-345.
Brechman, J., Bellman, S., Robinson, J. A., Rask, A., & Varan, D. (2016). Limited-Interruption Advertising In Digital-Video Content: An Analysis Compares the Effects of “Midroll” Versus “Preroll” Spots and Clutter Advertising. Journal of advertising research, 56(3), 289-298.
Bryant, J., & Comisky, P. W. (1978). The effect of positioning a message within differentially cognitively involving portions of a television segment on recall of the message. Human Communication Research, 5(1), 63-75.
Campbell, M. C., & Goodstein, R. C. (2001). The moderating effect of perceived risk on consumers' evaluations of product incongruity: Preference for the norm. Journal of consumer Research, 28(3), 439-449.
Celsi, R. L., & Olson, J. C. (1988). The role of involvement in attention and comprehension processes. Journal of consumer research, 15(2), 210-224.
Cho, C. H., and Cheon, H. J. 2004. “Why do People avoid Advertising on the Internet?,” Journal of Advertising (33:4), pp. 89-97.
Choi, S. M., & Rifon, N. J. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of web advertising credibility: A study of consumer response to banner ads. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 3(1), 12-24.
Collins, R. L. (2008). Media multitasking: Issues posed in measuring the effects of television sexual content exposure. Communication Methods and Measures, 2(1-2), 65-79.
Cronin, J. J., & Menelly, N. E. (1992). Discrimination vs. avoidance:“Zipping” of television commercials. Journal of Advertising, 21(2), 1-7.
Dahlén, M., Lange, F., Sjödin, H., & Törn, F. (2005). Effects of ad-brand incongruence. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 27(2), 1-12.
Dahlén, M., Rosengren, S., Törn, F., & Öhman, N. (2008). Could placing ads wrong be right?: advertising effects of thematic incongruence. Journal of Advertising, 37(3), 57-67.
De Pelsmacker, P., Geuens, M., & Anckaert, P. (2002). Media context and advertising effectiveness: The role of context appreciation and context/ad similarity. Journal of Advertising, 31(2), 49-61.
Edwards, S. M., Li, H., & Lee, J. H. (2002). Forced exposure and psychological reactance: Antecedents and consequences of the perceived intrusiveness of pop-up ads. Journal of Advertising, 31(3), 83-95.
Ellis, H. C., Ashbrook, P. W., Fiedler, K., & Forgas, J. (1988). Affect, cognition and social behaviour. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Hogrefe, 25-43.
Evans, N. J., & Hoy, M. G. (2016). Parents' presumed persuasion knowledge of children's advergames: The influence of advertising disclosure modality and cognitive load. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 37(2), 146-164.
Eysenck, H. J. (1993). Creativity and personality: Suggestions for a theory. Psychological inquiry, 4(3), 147-178.
Fazio, R. H. (2001). On the automatic activation of associated evaluations: An overview. Cognition & Emotion, 15(2), 115-141.
Fazio, R. H., & Zanna, M. P. (1981). Direct experience and attitude-behavior consistency. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 14, pp. 161-202). Academic Press.
Feltham, T. S., & Arnold, S. J. (1994). Program involvement and ad/program consistency as moderators of program context effects. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 3(1), 51-77.
Furnham, A., Bergland, J., & Gunter, B. (2002). Memory for television advertisements as a function of advertisement–programme congruity. Applied Cognitive Psychology: The Official Journal of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 16(5), 525-545.
Gardner, M. P. (1985). Does attitude toward the ad affect brand attitude under a brand evaluation set?. Journal of Marketing Research, 22(2), 192-198.
Gardner, Meryl P., Andrew A. Mitchell, and J. Edward Russo (1985), “Low Involvement Strategies for Processing Advertising,” Journal of Advertising, 14, 4-12.
Goodrich, K., Schiller, S. Z., & Galletta, D. (2015). Consumer reactions to intrusiveness of online-video advertisements: do length, informativeness, and humor help (or hinder) marketing outcomes?. Journal of Advertising Research, 55(1), 37-50.
Goodstein, R. C. (1993). Category-based applications and extensions in advertising: Motivating more extensive ad processing. Journal of consumer research, 20(1), 87-99.
Ha, L. (1996). Observations: Advertising clutter in consumer magazines: Dimensions and effects. Journal of Advertising Research, 36(4), 76–84.
Ha, L., & McCann, K. (2008). An integrated model of advertising clutter in offline and online media. International Journal of Advertising, 27(4), 569-592.
Halkias, G., & Kokkinaki, F. (2014). The degree of ad–brand incongruity and the distinction between schema-driven and stimulus-driven attitudes. Journal of Advertising, 43(4), 397-409.
Herr, P. M. (1989). Priming price: Prior knowledge and context effects. Journal of consumer research, 16(1), 67-75.
Higgins, E. T., Bargh, J. A., & Lombardi, W. J. (1985). Nature of priming effects on categorization. Journal of experimental psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11(1), 59.
Holbrook, M. B., & Hirschman, E. C. (1982). The experiential aspects of consumption: Consumer fantasies, feelings, and fun. Journal of consumer research, 9(2), 132-140.
Houston, Michael J., Terry L. Childers, and Susan E. Heckler (1987), “PictureWord Consistency and the Elaborative Processing of Advertisements,” Journal of Marketing Research, 24 (4), 359–69.
Hutchinson, J., & Moore, D. L. (1984). Issues surrounding the examination of delay effects in advertising. ACR North American Advances.
Jeong, S. H., & Fishbein, M. (2007). Predictors of multitasking with media: Media factors and audience factors. Media Psychology, 10(3), 364-384.
Jeong, S. H., & Hwang, Y. (2012). Does multitasking increase or decrease persuasion? Effects of multitasking on comprehension and counterarguing. Journal of Communication, 62(4), 571-587.
Jeong, S. H., Hwang, Y., & Fishbein, M. (2010). Effects of exposure to sexual content in the media on adolescent sexual behaviors: The moderating role of multitasking with media. Media Psychology, 13(3), 222-242.
Jeong, Y., & King, C. M. (2010). Impacts of website context relevance on banner advertisement effectiveness. Journal of Promotion Management, 16(3), 247-264.
Jing Wen, T., Kim, E., Wu, L., & Dodoo, N. A. (2020). Activating persuasion knowledge in native advertising: the influence of cognitive load and disclosure language. International Journal of Advertising, 39(1), 74-93.
Kahneman, Daniel (1973), Attention and Effort, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Keller, K. L. (1987). Memory factors in advertising: The effect of advertising retrieval cues on brand evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(3), 316-333.
Kennedy, J. R. (1971). How program environment affects TV commercials. Journal of Advertising Research, 11(1), 33-38.
Kent, R. J., & Allen, C. T. (1994). Competitive interference effects in consumer memory for advertising: the role of brand familiarity. Journal of marketing, 58(3), 97-105.
Kim, N. Y., & Sundar, S. S. (2010). Relevance to the rescue: Can “Smart Ads” reduce negative response to online ad clutter?. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 87(2), 346-362.
Klimesch, W. (1994). The structure of long-term memory: A connectivity model of semantic processing. Psychology Press.
Krugman, Hebert E. (1983), “Television Program Interest and Commercial Interruption: Are Commercials on Interesting Programs Less Effective?” Journal of Advertising Research, 23 (1), 21–23.
Krugman, H. E. (2000). Memory without recall, exposure without perception. Journal of Advertising Research, 40(6), 49-54.
Labroo, A. A., Dhar, R., & Schwarz, N. (2008). Of frog wines and frowning watches: Semantic priming, perceptual fluency, and brand evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(6), 819-831.
Lang, A. (2000). The limited capacity model of mediated message processing. Journal of communication, 50(1), 46-70.
Lang, A. (2006). Using the limited capacity model of motivated mediated message processing to design effective cancer communication messages. Journal of communication, 56, S57-S80.
Lang, A., Kurita, S., Gao, Y., & Rubenking, B. (2013). Measuring television message complexity as available processing resources: Dimensions of information and cognitive load. Media Psychology, 16(2), 129-153.
Lee, A. Y., & Labroo, A. A. (2004). The effect of conceptual and perceptual fluency on brand evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 41(2), 151-165.
Li, H., & Lo, H. Y. (2015). Do you recognize its brand? The effectiveness of online in-stream video advertisements. Journal of Advertising, 44(3), 208-218.
Li, H., Edwards, S. M., & Lee, J. H. (2002). Measuring the intrusiveness of advertisements: Scale development and validation. Journal of advertising, 31(2), 37-47.
Lloyd, D. W., & Clancy, K. J. (1991). Television program involvement and advertising response: Some unsettling implications for copy research. Journal of Consumer Marketing.
Lutz, R. J., MacKenzie, S. B., & Belch, G. E. (1983). Attitude toward the ad as a mediator of advertising effectiveness: Determinants and consequences. ACR North American Advances.
Lynch Jr, J. G., & Srull, T. K. (1982). Memory and attentional factors in consumer choice: Concepts and research methods. Journal of consumer research, 9(1), 18-37.
Machleit, K. A., & Wilson, R. D. (1988). Emotional feelings and attitude toward the advertisement: The roles of brand familarity and repetition. Journal of Advertising, 17(3), 27-35.
Machleit, K. A., Allen, C. T., & Madden, T. J. (1993). The mature brand and brand interest: An alternative consequence of ad-evoked affect. Journal of Marketing, 57(4), 72-82.
MacInnis, D. J., & Jaworski, B. J. (1989). Information processing from advertisements: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of marketing, 53(4), 1-23.
MacKenzie, S. B., & Spreng, R. A. (1992). How does motivation moderate the impact of central and peripheral processing on brand attitudes and intentions?. Journal of consumer research, 18(4), 519-529.
Maoz, E., & Tybout, A. M. (2002). The moderating role of involvement and differentiation in the evaluation of brand extensions. Journal of Consumer psychology, 12(2), 119-131.
Meyers-Levy, J., & Tybout, A. M. (1989). Schema congruity as a basis for product evaluation. Journal of consumer research, 16(1), 39-54.
Mitchell, A. A. (1982). Models of memory: Implications for measuring knowledge structures. ACR North American Advances.
Moe, W. W. (2006). A field experiment to assess the interruption effect of pop-up promotions. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 20(1), 34–44.
Moore, R. S., Stammerjohan, C. A., & Coulter, R. A. (2005). Banner advertiser-web site context congruity and color effects on attention and attitudes. Journal of advertising, 34(2), 71-84.
Moorman, M., Neijens, P. C., & Smit, E. G. (2002). The effects of magazine-induced psychological responses and thematic congruence on memory and attitude toward the ad in a real-life setting. Journal of Advertising, 31(4), 27-40.
Moorman, M., Neijens, P. C., & Smit, E. G. (2005). The effects of program responses on the processing of commercials placed at various positions in the program and the block. Journal of Advertising Research, 45(1), 49-59.
Nelson, L. D., Meyvis, T., & Galak, J. (2009). Enhancing the television-viewing experience through commercial interruptions. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(2), 160-172.
Olshavsky, R. W. (1994). Attention as an epiphenomenon: Some implications for advertising. Attention, Attitude and Affect in Response to Advertising, 97-106.
Park, C. Whan and S. Mark Young (1986), “Consumer Response to Television Commercials: The Impact of Involvement and Background Music on Brand Attitude Formation,” Journal of Marketing Research, 23 (February), 11-24.
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In Communication and persuasion (pp. 1-24). Springer, New York, NY.
Petty, R. E., Haugtvedt, C. P., & Smith, S. M. (1995). Elaboration as a determinant of attitude strength: Creating attitudes that are persistent, resistant, and predictive of behavior. Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences, 4(93-130).
Reber, R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience?. Personality and social psychology review, 8(4), 364-382.
Schacter, D. L., & Graf, P. (1986). Effects of elaborative processing on implicit and explicit memory for new associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12(3), 432.
Schmitt, B. H. (1994). Contextual priming of visual information in advertisements. Psychology & Marketing, 11(1), 1-14.
Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of personality and social psychology, 45(3), 513.
Sengupta, J., Goodstein, R. C., & Boninger, D. S. (1997). All cues are not created equal: Obtaining attitude persistence under low-involvement conditions. Journal of Consumer Research, 23(4), 351-361.
Shapiro, S. (1999). When an ad's influence is beyond our conscious control: Perceptual and conceptual fluency effects caused by incidental ad exposure. Journal of consumer research, 26(1), 16-36.
Sharma, A. (2000). Recall of television commercials as a function of viewing context: The impact of program-commercial congruity on commercial messages. The Journal of general psychology, 127(4), 383-396.
Soldow, G. F., & Principe, V. (1981). Response to commercials as a function of program context. Journal of Advertising Research.
Speck, P. S., & Elliott, M. T. (1997). Predictors of advertising avoidance in print and broadcast media. Journal of Advertising, 26(3), 61-76.
Starr, V., & Lowe, C. A. (1995). The influence of program context and order of ad presentation on immediate and delayed responses to television advertisements. ACR North American Advances.
Stewart, D. W., & Koslow, S. (1989). Executional factors and advertising effectiveness: A replication. Journal of Advertising, 18(3), 21-32.
Thorson, E., & Zhao, X. (1997). Television viewing behavior as an indicator of commercial effectiveness. Measuring advertising effectiveness, 221-237.
Thorson, E., Chi, A., & Leavitt, C. (1992). Attention, memory, attitude, and conation: A test of the advertising hierarchy. ACR North American Advances.
Wang, J., & Calder, B. J. (2009). Media engagement and advertising: Transportation, matching, transference and intrusion. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19(3), 546-555.
Yi, Y. (1990). Cognitive and affective priming effects of the context for print advertisements. Journal of advertising, 19(2), 40-48.
Zhang, W., Jeong, S. H., & Fishbein, M. (2010). Situational factors competing for attention. Journal of Media Psychology.