Recently, with the increasing female subjects supporting feminism, critique has been strongly made about patriarchal male characters in popular culture texts. It was no exception for Korean movies and the male protagonists who abuse the weak and still want comfort and help from them have started to be criticized unprecedently. In this respect, Heo, Jinho's films occupy unique place. In his movies from his feature debut film <Christmas in August>(1998) to <A Good Rain Knows>(2009) that mainly depict contemporary heterosexual romantic relationship, we can see men who embody softness. They do not insist it is only men that are the subject of history by suffering and owning narrative, or fall into self‐pity. Instead, they are kind, polite and show empathy to those around them including their partners. This paper names these characteristics as 'softness' and tries to demonstrate how it is different from the dominant masculinity of contemporary times. The reason this different masculinity was able to be represented is that dailiness was reinstated and intimate relationship has been more important to men due to improved gender equality with the arrival of the 1990s when institutional democracy was established. Still, this softness is possible only with the hegemony men have in unequal gender hierarchy. Men have more opportunities in public sphere to be recognized and approved which means women they are in relationship with are not in an equal position that pushes men to actively negotiate or resolve conflicts. In Heo's films, it is described by female characters' more putting more efforts in forming and sustaining the relationships. Not falling into self‐pitying colonized masculinity, Heo's films have shown softness which is a rare feature of masculinity in Korea. However, it still needs to be pointed out that it is only men's privilege based on patriarchal gender hierarchy. The fact that his representation of contemporary heterosexual romantic relationship has stopped in 'the era of misogyny' and ten years of conservative regime implies that the current relationship is in a very different phase. Through the analysis of soft masculinity in Heo's films, we can understand undiscovered masculinity and the changing aspects of gender inequality.
김혜리, 팟캐스트 <필름클럽>(2017.10.10. 업로드분), http://www.podbbang.com/ch/13003.
정희진, 「편재遍在하는 남성성, 편재偏在하는 남성성」, 권김현영 엮음, 『남성성과 젠더』, 자음과모음, 2011, 25쪽.
정희진, 「한국 남성의 식민성과 여성주의 이론」, 권김현영 엮음, 『한국 남성을 분석한다』, 교양인, 2017, 61쪽.
권김현영, 「근대 전환기 한국의 남성성」, 권김현영 엮음, 『한국 남성을 분석한다』, 교양인, 2017, 69․77쪽.
이계진, 「아빠의 흰 머리 가슴아파요」, 『매일경제』, 1998.3.13.
「IMF뒤 가장의 변화」, 『동아일보』, 1998.5.4.
Kyung Hyun Kim, The remasculinization of Korean Cinema, Durham: Duke University Press, 2004, p.10.
백문임, 『줌 아웃 한국 영화의 정치학』, 연세대학교 출판부, 2001, 132-133쪽.
오영숙, 「나르시소스의 자기모멸과 미적 자의식」, 연세대학교 미디어아트연구소 엮음, 『강원도의 힘』, 삼인, 2003, 44쪽.
김소영, 「‘우리’의 이름으로 날 부르지 말아요—박하사탕과 차이의 정치학」, 연세대학교 미디어아트연구소 엮음, 『박하사탕』, 삼인, 2003, 79․93쪽.
김소희, 「패배를 향한 또 하나의 메타내러티브」, 연세대학교 미디어아트연구소 엮음, 『박하사탕』, 삼인, 2003, 131쪽.
이현경, 「한국 멜로영화의 다양한 분화 양상—1990년대 후반기 이후 한국 남성 멜로영화」, 대중서사장르연구회, 『대중서사장르의 모든 것: 1. 멜로드라마』, 이론과실천, 2007.
에바 일루즈, 『사랑은 왜 아픈가』, 김희상 역, 돌베개, 2013, 144쪽.
박해천, 『아파트 게임』, 휴머니스트, 2013, 203․217쪽.
곽현자, 「‘홍상수 영화’ 보기의 즐거움과 괴로움」, 연세대학교 미디어아트연구소 엮음, 『강원도의 힘』, 삼인, 2003, 60쪽.
R. W. 코넬, 『남성성/들』, 안상욱․현민 역, 이매진, 2003, 374쪽.
김혜리, 「그늘진 러브스토리에도 희열은 있다—<외출> 촬영현장」, 『씨네21』, 2005.6.7. (http://www.cine21.com/news/view/?mag_id=31113)
이주은, 「10가지 키워드로 보는 댄디의 초상」, 쥘 바르베 도르비이 외, 『멋쟁이 남자들의 이야기 댄디즘』, 고봉만 역, 이봄, 2014, 23․25․43쪽.
고봉만, 「무례한 댄디의 내면에 대하여」, 쥘 바르베 도르비이 외, 『멋쟁이 남자들의 이야기 댄디즘』, 이봄, 2014, 56-57쪽.
고봉만, 쥘 바르베 도르비이 외, 『멋쟁이 남자들의 이야기 댄디즘』, 이봄, 2014, 67쪽.