바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

대중서사연구

An Essay on the Deconstructive Conceptual Paradigms of Local Literature ― with a reflectional speculation on the conceptual schema of literary popularity ―

대중서사연구 / 대중서사연구, (P)1738-3188; (E)27139964
2022, v.28 no.3, pp.243-275
https://doi.org/10.18856/jpn.2022.28.3.007

  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Literature is an aspect of linguistic performance. Language obtains an opportunity for progress by realizing the effects of ordinary linguistic performances and other communications through literary performances. But there is no specialized language that is different from ordinary language and specialized in the area unique to literature. Therefore, a conceptual schema for the legitimacy of literature that proves the aesthetic features that well embody the qualities of so-called literary language is nonsense. The marked signs defined by the conceptual schema of negative terms added to literature, such as local literature or popular literature, have no substance. In this context, it is essential to diagnose whether the conceptual schema derived from the ideology of the Center involved in literature is reasonable, and to reveal and disrupt the operation of the unjust ideology. This article corresponds to an essay that evokes this process.

keywords
local language, local literature, popular literature, local, pop, conceptual paradigm, conceptual schema, transboundary, deconstruction, 지역어문학, 지역어, 대중 문학, 지역, 대중, 개념 계열, 개념 도식, 탈경계, 해체

Reference

1.

Armstrong, Paul B., How Literature Plays with the Brain, Johns Hopkins University Press, 2013.

2.

Baars, Bernard J. & Gage, Nicle M., 『인지, 뇌, 의식』, 강봉균 역, 교보문고, 2012.

3.

Bermúdez, José Luis, Cognitive Science, Cambridge UP.(Kindle edition), 2014.

4.

Boyer, Pascal, Minds Make Societies: How Cognition Explains the World Humans Create, Yale University Press(Kindle edition), 2018.

5.

Comer, C., & Taggart, A., Brain, Mind, and the Narrative Imagination, Bloomsbury Academic(Kindle edtion), 2021.

6.

Dehaene, Stanislas, Consciosness and the Brain, Penguin Books(Kindle edition), 2014.

7.

Eckert, Penelope and Rickford, John R. (ed.), Style and Sociolinguistic Variation, Cambridge UP., 2001.

8.

Ehrlich, Susan, Point of View; A Linguistic Analysis of Literary Style, Routledge, 1990.

9.

Fauconnier, Gilles & Turner, Mark, The Way We Think, Basic Books, 2002.

10.

Fish, Stanley, Is There a Text in This Class?; The Authority of Interpretive Community, Harvard UP., 1980.

11.

Fowler, Roger, Literature as Social Discourse, Batsford Academic and Education Ltd., 1981.

12.

Herman, David (ed.), Narrative Theory and the Cognitive Sciences, CSLI, 2003.

13.

Herman, David, Storytelling and the Sciences of Mind, The MIT Press, 2013.

14.

Holland, Norman N., Literature and the Brain, The PsyArt Foundation, 2009.

15.

Hickey, Leo (ed.), The Pragmatics of Style, Routledge, 1990.

16.

Lakoff, George and Johnson, Mark, Metaphors We Live By, Chicago UP., 1980.

17.

Sell, Roger D., Literary Pragmatics, Routledge, 1991.

18.

Truner, Mark, The Origin of Ideas, Oxford University Press, 2014.

19.

Turner, Mark (ed.), The Artful Mind, Oxford University Press, 2006.

20.

Uttal, William R., Mind and Brain, The MIT Press, 2011.

대중서사연구