바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Development of an Electronic Greenhouse Gas Emission Management Platform: Managerial Implications

The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business / The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, (E)2233-5382
2020, v.11 no.11, pp.7-18
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.13106/jidb.2020.vol11.no11.7
BAE, Deogsang
CHO, Yooncheong
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Purpose: The Emission Trading Scheme (ETS), which enables structuring emission credits as a financial product, is taking a crucial position of global collaboration against climate change. Previous studies that have covered ETS subjects from the macro perspective contribute to facilitating legal enactment of this scheme. However, they have rarely addressed challenges aligned with issues arising from labor burdens for ETS works from the business perspective. Research Design, data and methodology: This study presents conceptual models that are expected to help design an electronic system. The study model contains four modules: emission allocation, data interface, reduction technology sharing, and emission trading. Two validation approaches, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and regression analysis, are applied in confirming the feasibility of the proposed model. Results: This study suggests an IT system methodology to help improvement of the current K-ETS mechanism. In particular, this study addresses effectiveness for real businesses and the adaptability of this mechanism to other nations. Conclusions: The proposed IT platform diagram can contribute to successful operation of ETS by providing multiple benefits to participating companies through in-house allocation mechanisms, the soft-landing of ETS adoption to participating companies through reduction of technology-sharing, group purchases, and transaction costs through the trading system.

keywords
Emission Trading Scheme, AHP, GHG

Reference

1.

Allison, G., & Zelikow, P. (1999). Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Pearson.

2.

Almer, C., & Winkler, R. (2017). Analyzing the Effectiveness of International Environmental Policies: The Case of the Kyoto Protocol. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 82, 125-151.

3.

Asian Development Bank (ADB) (2016). Emissions Trading Schemes and Their Linking: Challeng es and Opportunities in Asia and the Pacific. 1 103. Retrieved from https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/182501/emi ssions trading schemes.pdf

4.

Barrett, S. (1998). Political Economy of the Kyto Protocol. Oxford Review of Economic Policy , 14 (4), 20-39.

5.

Betz, R. A., & Schmidt, O. S. (2015). Transfer Patterns in Phase I of the EU Emissions Trading System: A First Reality Check based on Cluster Analysis. Climate Policy , 16 (4), 474-495.

6.

Bhatt, G. (2000). An Empirical Examination of the Effects of Information Systems Integration on Business Process Improvement. I nternational Journal of Operations & Production Management , 20 (11), 1331-1359.

7.

Bhatt, G., & Troutt, M. (2005). Examining the Relationship between Business Process Improvement Initiatives, Information Systems Integration and Customer Focus: An Empirical Study. Business Process Management Journal , 11 (5), 532-558.

8.

Bodansky, D. (2016). The Paris Climate Change Agreement: A New Hope?. American Journal of International Law , 110 (2), 288-319.

9.

Borghesi, S., & Montini, M. (2016). The Best (and worst) of GHG Emission Trading Systems: Comparing the EU ETS with its Followers. Frontiers in Energy Research , 4 (27), 1-19.

10.

Borghesi, S., Montini, M., & Barreca, A. (2016). Comparing the EU ETS with Its Follo wers. (Eds.), The European Emission Trading System and Its Followers, (pp.71 90), Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978 3 319 31186 9_3

11.

Cho, Y. (2020). Exploring Determinants of Performance Indicator and Customer Satisfaction of Accommodation Sharing, The Journal of Asian Finance, Economic, and Business , 7(3), 201-210

12.

Choi, S. P. (2009). Legal and Institutional Study on Greenhouse Gas Emission Allowance & Trading With a Focus on the Study of the European Emissi on Allowance & Trading. Korean Environmental Law Association , 31 (2), 171-208.

13.

Clémençon, R. (2016). The Two Sides of the Paris Climate Agreement: Dismal Failure or Historic Breakthrough? The Journal of Environment & Development , 25 (1), 3-24.

14.

EdwinWoerdman. (2000). Implementing the Kyoto Protocol: Why JI and CDM Show More Promise than International Emissions Trading. Energy Policy , 28 (1), 29-38.

15.

European Union (EU). (2015). EU ETS Handbook. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/clima/sites/clima/files/doc s/ets_handbook _en.pdf

16.

Falkner, R. (2016). The Paris Agreement and the New Logic of International Climate Politics. International Affairs , 92 (5), 1107-1125.

17.

Goold, M., & Campbell, A. (1998). Desperately Seeking Synergy. Harvard Business Review , 76 (5), 130-143.

18.

Huo, N., & Cho, Y. (2020). Investigating Effects of Metacognitive Strategies on Reading Engagement: Managing Globalized Education. Journal of Industiral Distribution Business , 11 (5), 17-26.

19.

Islam, Z., Ahmed, Z., Saifullah, K., Huda, S. N., & Al Islam, S. M. (2017). CO2 Emission, Energy Consumption and Economic Development: A Case of Bangladesh. Journal of Asian finance, Economics, and Business , 4 (4), 61-66.

20.

Jeong, K., Hong, T., & Kim, J. (2018). Development of a CO2 Emission Benchmark for Achieving the National CO2 Emission Reduction Target by 2030. Energy and Buildings , 158 (1), 86-94.

21.

Jeong, Y. G. (2013). National Tax Service IT System Integration Feasibility Study. Korea Development Institute (KDI). 1-200. Retrieved from http://pimac.kdi.re.kr/stu dy/filedown.jsp?filename=13449&me mber_pub=2

22.

Kachi, A., Unger, C., Böhm, N., Stelmakh, K., Haug, C., & Frerk, M. (2015). Linking Emissions Trading Systems: A Summary of Current Research. International Carbon Action Partnership, Berlin, Germany, 1-20.

23.

Khanna , T., & Rivkin, J. W. (2000). Estimating the Performance Effects of Business Groups in Emerging Markets. Strategic Management Journal , 22 (1), 45-74.

24.

Kim, G., & Sim, S. (2017). GHG Emission Trading Scheme Diagnose and Alternatives. Institute of Energy Econ omics Retrieved from https://www.nkis.re.kr:4445/subject_view1.do?otpId=KEEI00 052703&otpSeq=0

25.

Kim, J. E. (2009). Study on Introduction of GHGs Internal Emission Trading System. Mater Thesis, Korea University. Retrieved from http://www.riss.kr/search/detail /DetailView.do?p_mat_type=b e54d9b8bc7cdb09&control_no=ffeac2bb9432e558ffe0bdc3ef 48d419

26.

Kim, Y., & Cho, Y. (2020). Investigating Determinats that Affect Job and Life Dissatifaction: The Case of Relocation. Journal of Industiral Distribution Business , 11 (3), 29-38

27.

Klepper, G., & Peterson, S. (2006). Emissions Trading, CDM, JI, and More: The Climate Strategy of the EU. The Energy Journal , 27 (2), 1-26.

28.

Korea Development Institute (KDI). (2008). Pre Feasibility Test Guideline. 1-455. Retrieved from http://pimac .kdi.re.kr/guide/rguide_list.jsp

29.

Lee, C. F., Lin, S. J., & Lewis, C. (2008). Analysis of the Impacts of Combining Carbon Taxation and Emission Trading on Different Industry Sectors. Energy Policy , 36 (2), 722-729.

30.

Lee, J., & Unger, B. (2012). Information and Communications Technology, Economic Growth, and Carbon Emission Levels: The Case of South Korea. Jouranl of Distribution Science , 10 (6), 7-15.

31.

McKibbin, W. J., Ross, M. T., Shackleton, R., & Wilcoxen, P. J. (1999). Emissions Trading, Capital Flows and the Kyoto Protocol. The Energy Journal , 20, 287-333.

32.

Ministry of Environment. (2012). Allbaro System Effect. Sejong. Retrieved from https://me.go.kr/daegu/web/board/read.do;jsessionid=41KGfuj DtctS8N1zYojgpGSB1oMFy3 tFASbyVOsF1LTI1pl80wXaM4 joMidERJa3.meweb2vhost_servlet_engine1?pagerOffset=80& maxPageItems=10&maxIndexPages=10&searchKey=&search Value=&menuId=710&orgCd=&boardId=328281&boardMast erId=499&boardCategoryId=478&decorator=

33.

Ministry of Environment. (2015). Offest Registry System User Manual. Sejong. Retrieved from http://ors.gir.go.kr/home/board/read.do?pagerOffset=20&max PageItems=10&maxIndexPages=10&searchKey=&searchValu e=&menuId=2&boardId=2&boardMasterId=4

34.

Mukhwejww, T., & Sen, S. S. (2019). Intellectual Capital Corporate Sustainable Growth: The Indian Evidence. Journal of Business, Economics and Environmental Studies , 9 (2), 5-15.

35.

Olmstead, S. M., & Stavins, R. N. (2011). Three Key Elements of a Post 2012 International Climate Policy Architecture. Review of Enviro nmental Economics and Policy , 6(1), 65-85.

36.

Paik, I., & Kang, W. (2018). The Impact of Consumption Utility from Green Retail Environment on Revisit Intention. Journal of Distribution Science , 16 (2), 67-81.

37.

Ritchie, A. (2015). Allocation: Benchmarking and Capacity Utilisation Rate. ICF International, 1-15. Retrieved from https://www.ieta.org/Resources/B PMR/Seoul 2015/bpmr korea icf allocation march2015.pdf

38.

Rosen, A. M. (2015). The Wrong Solution at the Right Time: The Failure of the Kyoto Protocol on Clima te Change. Politics & Policy , 43 (1), 30-58.

39.

Ryu, J. (2019). Consumer Characteristics Shopping for Fashion in the Omni channel Retail Environment. Journal of Business, Economics and Environmental Studies , 9 (4), 15-22.

40.

Sandor, R., Walsh, M., & Kanakasabai, M. (2008). United States of America Patent No.: US7343341B2, Systems and Methods for Trading Emission Reductions. https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/ea/0e/85/b756386 3e3fb55/US7343341.pdf

41.

Savaresi, A. (2016). The Paris Agreement: a New Beginning? Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law , 34 (1), 16-26.

42.

Son, B., & Cho, Y. (2020). An Analysis on Factors that Affect Academic Achievement in Globalized Environment. Journal of Industiral Distribution Business , 11 (6), 7-17.

43.

Sun, I., & Lee, D. (2010). A Study on the Improvement of Distribution System by Overseas Agricultural Investment. Journal of Distribution System , 8 (3), 17-26.

44.

The World Bank (WB). (2016). Emission Trading Registries: Guidance on Regulation, Development, and Administration. Retrieved from http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/780741476303872 666/pdf/109027 WP PUBLIC 12 10 2016 15 54 42 PMRFCPFRegistriesPosting.pdf

45.

Tuerk, A., Mehling, M., Flachsland, C., & Sterk, W. (2011). Linking Carbon Markets: Concepts, Case Studies and Pathways. Climate Policy , 9 (4), 341-357.

46.

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). (2015). Paris Agreement. 1-25. Retrieved from https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/english_paris_agreement.pdf

47.

Vespermann, J., & Wittmer, A. (2011). Financial, Ecological and Managerial Impacts of Emission Trading Schemes: The Case of Lufthansa. Business Strategy and the Environment , 20 (3), 174-191.

48.

Wijaya, A., Ilmi, Z., & Darma, D., C. (2020). Economic Performance: Leading Sector, Economic Stucture and Comp etitiveness of Export Commidities. Journal of Business, Economics and Environmental Studies , 10 (3), 23-33.

49.

Williamson, O. (1993). Transaction Cost Economics and Organization Theory. Indusrial and Corporate Change , 2 (2), 107-156.

50.

Wind, Y., & Saaty, T. L. (1980). Marketing Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Management Science , 26 (7), 641-745.

51.

Woerdman, E. (2000). Implementing the Kyoto Protocol: Why JI and CDM Show More Promise than International Emissions Trading. Energy Policy , 28 (1), 29-38.

52.

Xu, L., Deng, S., & Thomas, V. M. (2016). Carbon Emission Permit Price Volatility Reduction through Financial Options. Energy Economics , 53, 248-260.

53.

Zahari, A., R., Esa, E., Rajadurai, J., Azizan, N., A., & Muhamad Tamyez, P., F. (2020). The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility Practices on Brand Equity: An Examination of Malaysia's Top 100 Brands. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business , 7 (2), 271-280.

The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business