- Apply for Authority
- E-ISSN2233-5382
- KCI
E-ISSN : 2233-5382
A Study on the Moderating Effect that Value Congruence Influences Organizational Performance
- Downloaded
- Viewed
Abstract
Purpose - This study examined the relationship between individual creativity and its related variables to observe how individual creativity contributes to organizational performance. In addition, this study strived to explore how to maximize the utilization of individual creativity and innovate the structure of the organization itself so that teams and organizations can respond more effectively to new rising trends. this study aimed to examine whether the value congruence between individuals and organizations (propensity congruence, goal congruence has a significant impact on knowledge sharing and innovation behavior as dependent variables by exerting individual creativity and synergy as independent variables. Research design, data and methodology - SPSS 24.0 program were used to analyze the data. Descriptive Statistics and correlation analysis were performed, and the reliability factor (Cronbach's α) was calculated. Afterwards, we analyzed the moderating effects of structural equation model analysis and hierarchical regression analysis. The number of samples used in the study were 309 copies. Results - First, Individual creativity had a positive effect on knowledge sharing and innovative behavior. In other words, it was confirmed that decision-making processes fused with individual creativity could create an atmosphere of knowledge sharing and transform the organization. Second, value congruence adjusted the influence of individual creativity on knowledge sharing and innovation behavior. Conclusions - First, it is important for managers to recognize the value and secure the pool of creative talents who will be a potential future basic source of organizational success and competitive advantage. Second, managers should be able to identify those with creative talents and expertise, and use them to increase their knowledge sharing performance, while also developing emotional and motivational creativity. Third, in order improve knowledge sharing performance, managers should pay attention to the emotional aspect of creativity. Fourth, managers should strive to create an environment that is beneficial for the reinforcement of individual self-management capabilities. Fifth, managers should be able to develop decision-making processes to develop potential creativity and encourage creative thinking, opinions, or solutions. Sixth, managers should promote the dissemination and integration of new knowledge based on the creative views and attitudes of team members.
- keywords
- Individual Creativity, Value Congruence, Knowledge Sharing, Innovation Behavior
Reference
Abrams, L. C., Cross, R., Lesser, E., & Levin, D. Z. (2003). Nurturing Interpersonal Trust in Knowledge-Sharing Networks. Academy of Management Perspectives, 17(4), 64- 77.
Amabile, T. M. (1983). The Social Psychology of Creativity: A Componential Conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357-376.
Amabile, T. M. (1988). From Individual Creativity to Organizational Innovation. In K. Grønhaug, & G. Kaufmann (Eds.), Innovation: A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective (p. 139-166), Norwegian University Press.
Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the Work Environment for Creativity. The Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154-1184.
Amabile, T. M., Schatzel, E. A., Moneta, G. B., & Kramer, S. J. (2004). Leader Behaviors and the Work Environment for Creativity: Perceived Leader Support. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 5-32.
Bandura, A., & Locke, E. A. (2003). Negative Self-Efficacy and Goal Effects Revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(1), 87-99.
Bluedorn, A. C., Kalliath, T. J., Strube, M. J., & Martin, G. D. (1999). Polychronicity and the Inventory of Polychronic Values (IPV) The Development of an Instrument to Measure a Fundamental Dimension of Organizational Culture. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 14(3/4), 205-231.
Bock, G. W., Zmud, R. W., Kim, Y. G., & Lee, J. N. (2005). Behavioral Intention Formation in Knowledge Sharing: Examining the Roles of Extrinsic Motivators, Social- Psychological Factors, and Organizational Climate. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 87-111.
Cable, D. M., & Judge, T. A. (1996). Person–organization fit, job choice decisions, and organizational entry. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 67(3), 294-311.
Cazier, J. A., Shao, B. B., & Louis, R. D. (2007). Sharing Information and Building Trust Through Value Congruence. Information Systems Frontiers, 9(5), 515-529.
Chatman, J. A. (1989). Improving Interactional Organizational Research: A Model of Person-Organization Fit. Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 333-349.
Daellenbach, U. S., McCarthy, A. M., & Schoenecker, T. S. (1999). Commitment to Innovation: The Impact of Top Management Team Characteristics. R&D Management, 29(3), 199-208.
Davenport, S., Davies, J., & Grimes, C. (1998). Collaborative Research Programmes: Building Trust From Difference. Technovation, 19(1), 31-40.
Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and Education: The Self-Determination Perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4), 325-346.
Farmer, S. M., Tierney, P., & Kung-Mcintyre, K. (2003). Employee Creativity in Taiwan: An Application of Role Identity Theory. Academy of Management Journal, 46(5), 618-630.
Farr, J. L., & Ford, C. M. (1990). Individual innovation. In M. A. West & J. L. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies: 63–80. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Gupta, A. K., & Govindarajan, V. (2000). Knowledge Management's Social Dimension: Lessons From Nucor Steel. MIT Sloan Management Review, 42(1), 71-80.
Hunt, S. D., Wood, V. R., & Chonko, L. B. (1989). Corporate Ethical Values and Organizational Commitment in Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 53(3), 79-90.
Janssen, O. (2000). Job Demands, Perceptions of Effort‐Reward Fairness and Innovative Work Behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287–302.
Jung, D., Yammarino, F. J., & Lee, J. K. (2009). Moderating Role of Subordinates' Attitudes on Transformational Leadership and Effectiveness: A Multi-Cultural and Multi-Level Perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(4), 586-603.
Kanter, R. M. (1988). Three Tiers for Innovation Research. Communication Research, 15(5), 509-523.
Kleysen, R. F., & Street, C. T. (2001). Toward a Multi‐Dimensional Measure of Individual Innovative Behavior. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2(3), 284-296.
Lee, J. P., & Park, K. H. (2019). The Effect of Personal Creativity on Knowledge Sharing and Innovation Behavior: Focused on Retail Workers. Journal of Distribution Science, 17(10), 93-105.
Meglino, B. M., & Ravlin, E. C. (1998). Individual Values in Organizations: Concepts, Controversies, and Research. Journal of Management, 24(3), 351-389.
Morrison, E. W., & Phelps, C. C. (1999). Taking Charge At Work: Extrarole Efforts to Initiate Workplace Change. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 403-419.
Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee Creativity: Personal and Contextual Factors at Work. Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 607-634.
Ostroff, C., Shin, Y., & Kinicki, A. J. (2005). Multiple Perspectives of Congruence: Relationships Between Value Congruence and Employee Attitudes. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 26(6), 591-623.
Pirola-Merlo, A., & Mann, L. (2004). The Relationship Between Individual Creativity and Team Creativity: Aggregating Across People and Time. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(2), 235–257.
Riege, A. (2005). Three-Dozen Knowledge-Sharing Barriers Managers Must Consider. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(3), 18-35.
Rousseau, D. (1995). Psychological Contracts in Organizations: Understanding Written and Unwritten Agreements. Sage Publications.
Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of Innovative Behavior: A Path Model of Individual Innovation in the Workplace, The Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580- 607.
Shalley, C. E. (1995). Effects of Coaction, Expected Evaluation, and Goal Setting on Creativity and Productivity. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 483-503.
Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological Empowerment in the Workplace: Dimensions, Measurement, and Validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442-1465.
Spreng, R. A., MacKenzie, S. B., & Olshavsky, R. W. (1996). A Reexamination of the Determinants of Consumer Satisfaction. Journal of Marketing, 60(3), 15-32.
Thomas, K. W., & Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive Elements of Empowerment: An "Interpretive" Model of Intrinsic Task Motivation. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 666-681.
Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative Self-Efficacy: Its Potential Antecedents and Relationship to Creative Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1137-1148.
Wang, S., & Noe, R. A. (2010). Knowledge Sharing: A Review and Directions for Future Research. Human Resource Management Review, 20(2), 115-131.
West, M. A., & Farr, J. L. (1989). Innovation at Work: Psychological Perspectives. Social Behaviour, 4(1), 15-30.
Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a Theory of Organizational Creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293-321.
- Downloaded
- Viewed
- 0KCI Citations
- 0WOS Citations