- E-ISSN2233-5382
- KCI
E-ISSN : 2233-5382
Investigating Effects of Metacognitive Strategies on Reading Engagement: Managing Globalized Education
CHO, Yooncheong
Abstract
Purpose: Previous studies rarely investigated the effects of the metacognitive reading strategies on reading engagement, particularly in globalized higher education, while those studies examined reading problems and engagement with lower reading level. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of the metacognitive reading strategies including global reading, problem solving, and supporting reading on reading engagement that include argentic, behavior, emotional, and cognitive engagement in global learning environment. This study investigated research questions: how do global reading, problem solving, and supporting reading strategies affect argentic, behavior, emotional, and cognitive reading engagement? Research design, Data, and methodology: This study collected data via online survey in globalized learning environment. This study applied statistical analyses, such as factor and regression analyses and ANOVA. Results: The results of this study showed that metacognitive reading strategies had significant effects on student reading engagement while they were reading class materials in English for academic purposes. Conclusions: This study provides managerial implications in higher education by providing better strategies to enhance learning skills in global context. In particular, this study provides implications that the effects of problem solving and supporting strategies could be improved by adopting better management systems in globalized education.
- keywords
- Metacognitive Strategies, Reading Engagement, Globalized Education
Reference
Alderson, J. C. (2000). Assessing Reading. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Alfassi, M. (2004). Reading to Learn: Effects of Combined Strategy Instruction on High School Students. The Journal of Educational Research, 97(4), 171-185.
Amin, M. (2019). Developing Reading Skills through Effective Reading Approaches. International Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 4(1), 35-40.
Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, P. D. (1984). A Schema-theoretic View of Basic Processes in Reading Comprehension. Handbook of Reading Research, 1, 255-291.
Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., & Furlong, M. J. (2008). Student Engagement with School: Critical Conceptual and Methodological Issues of the Construct. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 369-386.
Archambault, I., Janosz, M., Fallu, J., & Pagani, L. S. (2009). Student Engagement and Its Relationship with Early High School Dropout. Journal of Adolescence, 32(3), 651–670.
Artino, A. R. Jr., & Jones II, K. D. (2012). Exploring the Complex Relations between Achievement Emotions and Self-regulated Learning Behaviors in Online Learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(3), 170-175.
Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S., & Furlong, M. J. (2008). Student Engagement with School: Critical Conceptual and Methodological Issues of the Construct. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 369-386.
Aydoğan, H., & Akbarov, A. A. (2014). The Four Basic Language Skills, Whole Language & Intergrated Skill Approach in Mainstream University Classrooms in Turkey. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(9), 672.
Bandura, A. (2006). Toward a Psychology of Human Agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(2), 164–180.
Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Brozo, W. G., Shiel, G., & Topping, K. (2007). Engagement in Reading: Lessons Learned from Three PISA Countries. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 51(4), 304-315.
Carrell, P. L., & Eisterhold, J. C. (1983). Schema Theory and ESL Reading Pedagogy. TESOL quarterly, 17(4), 553-573.
Carrell, P. L., & Eskey, D. E. (1988). Interactive Approaches to Second Language Reading. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Carrell, P. L., Pharis, B. G., & Liberto, J. C. (1989). Metacognitive Strategy Training for ESL Reading. Tesol Quarterly, 23(4), 647-678.
Christenson, S. L., Reschly, A. L., & Wylie, C. (2012). Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (Eds.). New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media.
Cook, G. (1997). Schemas. ELT Journal, 51(1), 86-86.
Farahian, M., & Farshid, M. (2014). A Reader-Response Approach to Reading: Does It Have an Effect on Metacognitive Reading Strategies?. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods, 4(1), 371.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.
Furrer, C., & Skinner, E. (2003). Sense of Relatedness as a Factor in Children’s Academic Engagement and Performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 148-162.
Grabe, W., & Zhang, C. (2013). Second Language Readingwriting Relations. In A. S. Horning & E. W. Kraemer (eds), Reconnecting Reading & Writing (p.108-133).
Gilakjani, A. P., & Ahmadi, S. M. (2011). The Relationship between L2 Reading Comprehension and Schema Theory: A Matter of Text Familiarity. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 1(2), 142-149.
Guthrie, J. T., Alao, S., & Rinehart, J. M. (1997). Literacy issues in focus Engagement in reading for young adolescents. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 40(6), 438-446.
Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., Barbosa, P., Perencevich, K. C., Taboada, A., Davis, M. H., & Tonks, S. (2004). Increasing Reading Comprehension and Engagement through Concept- Oriented Reading Instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 403-423.
Guthrie, J. T., & Klauda, S. L. (2014). Effects of Classroom Practices on Reading Comprehension, Engagement, and Motivations for Adolescents. Reading Research Quarterly, 49(4), 387-416.
Guthrie, J. T., & Klauda, S. L. (2015). Engagement and Motivational Processes in Reading. Handbook of Individual Differences in Reading: Reader, Text and Context, 41-53.
Hamza, A., & Nur, S. B. I. (2018), Reading Comprehension Strategies among EFL Learners in Higher Learning Institutions. Arab World English Journal, 9(2), 315-328.
Handelsman, M. M., Briggs, W. L., Sullivan, N., & Towler, A. (2005). A Measure of College Student Course Engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 98(3), 184-192.
Hirschfield, P. J., & Gasper, J. (2011). The Relationship between School Engagement and Delinquency in Late Childhood and Early Adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40(1), 3-22.
Ilustre, C. A. (2011). Beliefs about Reading, Metacognitive Reading Strategies and Text Comprehension among College Students in a Private University. Philippine ESL Journal, 7, 28-47.
Jacobs, J. E., & Paris, S. G. (1987). Children’s Metacognition about Reading: Issues in Definition, Measurement, and Instruction. Educational Psychologist, 22(3-4), 255-278.
Kahn, H. E., & Agnew, M. (2017). Global Learning Through Difference: Considerations for Teaching, Learning, and the Internationalization of Higher Education. Journal of Studies in International Education, 21(1), 52-64.
Karbalaei, A. (2010). A Comparison of the Metacognitive Reading Strategies Used by EFL and ESL Readers. The Reading Matrix, 10(2), 165-180.
Lane, E. S., & Harris, S. E. (2015). A New Tool for Measuring Student Behavioral Engagement in Large University Classes. Journal of College Science Teaching, 44(6), 83-91.
Lester, D. (2013). A Review of the Student Engagement Literature. FOCUS on Colleges, Universities & Schools, 7(1), 1-8.
Madhumathi, P., & Ghosh, A. (2012). Awareness of Reading Strategy Use of Indian ESL Students and the Relationship with Reading Comprehension Achievement. English Learning Teaching, 5(12), 131-140.
McElhone, D. (2012). Tell Us More: Reading Comprehension, Engagement, and Conceptual Press Discourse. Reading Psychology, 33(6), 525-561.
Meniado, J. C. (2016). Metacognitive Reading Strategies, Motivation, and Reading Comprehension Performance of Saudi EFL Students. English Language Teaching, 9(3), 117- 129.
Mokhtari, K., & Sheorey, R. (2002). Measuring ESL Students’ Awareness of Reading Strategies. Journal of Developmental Education, 25(3), 2-11.
Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. (2004). Investigating the Strategic Reading Processes of First and Second Language Readers in Two Different Cultural Contexts. System, 32(3), 379-394.
Mukhlif, Z., & Amir, Z. (2017). Investigating the Metacognitive Online Reading Strategies employed by Iraqi EFL Undergraduate Students. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 8(1), 372-385.
Nezami, S. R. A. (2012). A Critical Study of Comprehension Strategies and General Problems in Reading Skill Faced by Arab EFL Learners with Special Reference to Najran University in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Social Sciences & Education, 2(3), 306-316.
Nie, Y., & Lau, S. (2009). Complementary Roles of Care and Behavioral Control in Classroom Management: The Selfdetermination Theory Perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34(3), 185-194.
Park, S., Holloway, S. D., Arendtsz, A., Bempechat, J., & Li, J. (2012). What Makes Students Engaged in Learning? A Time- Use Study of Within-and Between-Individual Predictors of Emotional Engagement in Low-Performing High Schools. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41(3), 390-401.
Park, S. W., & Kim, C. (2016). The Effects of a Virtual Tutee System on Academic Reading Engagement in a College Classroom. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(2), 195-218.
Papleontiou-louca, E. (2003). The Concept and Instruction of Metacognition. Teacher Development, 7(1), 9-30.
Pinninti, L. (2016). Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies: An Indian Context. The Reading Matrix: An International Online, 16(1), 179-193.
Pookcharoen, S. (2009). Metacognitive Online Reading Strategies among Thai EFL University Students (Dissertation). Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana.
Ramli, N. F. M., Darus, S., & Bakar, N. A. (2011). Metacognitive Online Reading Strategies of Adult ESL Learners Using a Learning Management System. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(3), 195-204.
Reeve, J., & Tseng, C. M. (2011). Agency as a Fourth Aspect of Students’ Engagement during Learning Activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 257-267.
Reeve, J. (2012). A Self-determination Theory Perspective on Student Engagement. In Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, Boston, MA: Springer, 149-172.
Reeve, J. (2013). How Students Create Motivationally Supportive Learning Environments for Themselves: The Concept of Agentic Engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 579-595.
Seidlhofer, B. (2005). English as a Lingua Franca. ELT Journal, 59(4), 339-341.
Shehadeh, A. (2016). Reading Strategies Used by Palestinian College Students. Arab World English Journal, 6(4), 15-25.
Sheorey, R., & Mokhtari, K. (2001). Differences in the Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies among Native and Non-native Readers. System, 29(4), 431-449.
Songsiengchai, T. (2010). Strategies in Reading Online and Printed Academic Texts of English Major Students of Srinakharinwirot University (Master’s Thesis). Srinakharinwirot University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Taylor, B. M., Pearson, P. D., Peterson, D. S., & Rodriguez, M. C. (2003). Reading Growth in High-poverty Classrooms: The Influence of Teacher Practices that Encourage Cognitive Engagement in Literacy Learning. The Elementary School Journal, 104(1), 3-28.
Wigfield, A., Guthrie, J. T., Perencevich, K. C., Taboada, A., Klauda, S. L., McRae, A., & Barbosa, P. (2008). Role of Reading Engagement in Mediating Effects of Reading Comprehension Instruction on Reading Outcomes. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 432-445.
- Downloaded
- Viewed
- 0KCI Citations
- 0WOS Citations