- E-ISSN2233-5382
- KCI
E-ISSN : 2233-5382
Effects of Information Processing Types and Product Ownership on Usage Intention
Abstract
Purpose - Current research aimed at exploring the effect differences between the two types of processing product information such as the imagining and the considering on psychological product ownership which could influence the intent to purchase or use the product, and focused on identifying the interaction effects of activated memory information type and advertising information type on each of the information processing types. Research design, data, and methodology - This study divided the information processing types into imagining and considering, and the consumer's memories were divided into autobiographical or episodic and semantic memory. The advertising information was approached in each of event information being together with the product and product feature information. At empirical study, 2(two types of memory activation: episodic and semantic memory activation) ∗ 2(two types of advertising information: event-focused and product feature-focused advertising information) between-subjects design was used to make four types of questionnaire according to the type of experimental groups. Through the survey platform, 'questionnaire stars' of 'WeChat' in China, 219 questionnaire data were collected for empirical study. The structural equation model in AMOS 26 and Anova were used to verify hypotheses. Results - First, the ownership affected the usage intent positively. Second, the imagining did not affect the psychological ownership but did directly affect the usage intention, and the considering affected the ownership positively. Third, the episodic memory activation positively influenced the imagining and negatively affected the considering, whereas the semantic memory activation positively influenced the considering and negatively affected the imagining. Fourth, event-advertising information increased the effects of the activated episodic memory on the imagining, and feature-advertising information increased the effects of the activated semantic memory on the considering. Conclusions - marketers should develop and advertise their product-related event message to trigger the imaging that directly increase the intent to purchase or use their product, when consumers are under the activation of their episodic memory. And marketers should advertise their product feature-related message to trigger the considering that could induce consumers' ownership for their product to increase the intent to purchase or use their product, when they are under the activation of their semantic memory.
- keywords
- Considering, Episodic Memory, Imagining, Ownership, Semantic Memory
Reference
Anderson, J. R. (1983). A spreading activation theory of memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 261-295.
Aron, A., Aron, E. N., Tudor, M., & Nelson, G. (1991). Close relationships as including other in the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 241–253.
Baumgartner, H., Sujan, M., & Bettman, J. R. (1992). Autobiographical memories, affect and consumer information processing. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 1(1), 53–82.
Baumgartner, T., Lutz, K., Schmidt, C. F., & Jäncke, L. (2006). The emotional power of music: how music enhances the feeling of affective pictures. Brain research, 1075(1), 151-164.
Beggan, J. K., & Brown, E. M. (1994). Association as a psychological justification for ownership. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 128(4), 365–380.
Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 139–168.
Bless, H., & Schwarz, N. (2010). Mental construal and the emergence of assimilation and contrast Effects: The inclusion/exclusion Model, in Mark P. Zanna(ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology(pp. 319–373), San Diego, CA:Elsevier.
Brann, E. T. (1991). The world of the imagination: Sum and substance. Savage, MD: Rowman & Utttefield Publishers.
Brewer, W. F. (1986). What is autobiographical memory? In D. C. Rubin (Ed.), Autobiographical memory (pp. 25–49). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, G., Crossley, C., & Robinson, S. L. (2014). Psychological ownership, territorial behavior, and being perceived as a team contributor: The critical role of trust in the work environment. Personnel Psychology, 67(2), 463–485.
Buckner, R. L., & Carroll, D. C. (2007). Self-projection and the brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 49–57.
Chiang, H.-H., Chang, A., & Han, T.-S. (2012). A multilevel investigation of relationships among brand-centered HRM, brand psychological ownership, brand citizenship behaviors, and customer satisfaction. European Journal of Marketing, 46(5), 626–662.
Choi, B. N., Lee, H. H., & Yang, H. C. (2014). Impacts of value inclination and self-expressive consuming propensity upon ecofriendly product purchasing intention. East Asian Journal of Business Management, 4(4), 39-49.
Choi, N.-H. (2015).The Interaction Roles of Ambient Pride Type and Advertisement Type on Product Evaluation. Journal of Distribution Science, 13(5), 61-70.
Choi, N.-H., & Dhakal, A. (2017). Roles of power state and message types on restaurant store brand attitude. Journal of Distribution Science, 15(10), 5-14.
Corballis, M. C. (2003). Recursion as the key to the human mind. In K. Sterelny & J. Fitness (Eds.), From mating to mentality:Evaluating evolutionary psychology(pp. 155–171). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Escalas, J. E. (2004). Imagine yourself in the product: Mental simulation, narrative transportation, and persuasion. Journal of Advertising, 33(2), 37–48.
Essig, E. (2017). Exploring psychological ownership towards the group and its routes in the French military sector, in C. Olckers, L. van Zyl, L. van der Vaart(Eds.). Theoretical Orientations and Practical Applications of Psychological Ownership(pp. 203-228), Springer International Publishing.
Gibbons, F. X. (1990). Self-attention and behavior: A review and theoretical update, in Mark P. Zanna(ed.). Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 23, San Diego, CA: Academic Press. 249–303.
Hoyer, W. D., MacInnis, D. J., & Pieters, R. (2013). Consumer Behavior (6th ed.). South-Western, Cengage Learning.
Huifeng, P., Ha, H. Y., & Lee, J. W. (2020). Perceived risks and restaurant visit intentions in China: Do online customer reviews matter? Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 43, 179-189.
Kappes, H. B., & Morewedge, C. K. (2016). Mental simulation as substitute for experience. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(7), 405-420.
Kirk, C. P., Peck, J., & Swain, S. D. (2018). Property lines in the mind: Consumers‟ psychological ownership and their territorial responses. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(1), 148–168.
Lamberton, C., & Goldsmith, K, (2020). Ownership: A perennial prize or a fading goal? A curation, framework, and agenda for future research. Journal of Consumer Research, 47(2), 301–309.
MacInnis, D. J., & Price, L. L. (1987). The role of imagery in information processing: Review and extensions. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(March), 473–491.
Peck, J., Barger, V., & Webb, A. (2013). In search of a surrogate for touch: The effect of haptic imagery on perceived ownership. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23(2), 189–196.
Peck, J., & Childers, T. L. (2003). Individual differences in haptic information processing: The “need for touch” scale. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(3), 430–442.
Peck, J., & Shu, S. B. (2009). The effect of mere touch on perceived ownership. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(3), 434–447.
Pezzulo, G., & Castelfranchi, C. (2009). Thinking as the control of imagination: A conceptual framework for goal-directed systems. Psychological Research, 73(4), 559–577.
Pierce, J. L., & Jussila, I. (2011). Psychological Ownership and the Organizational Context, Theory, Research Evidence and Application. Northampton, Massachusetts, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T. (2003). The state of psychological ownership: Integrating and extending a century of research. Review of General Psychology, 7(1), 84–107.
Reimann, M., & Aron, A. (2009) Self-expansion motivation and inclusion of brands in self: Toward a theory of brand relationships.” In Deborah J. Macinnis, C. Whan Park, and Joseph W. Priester (eds), Handbook of Brand Relationships(pp.65–81). Armonk, NY: Sharpe.
Samuelsen, B. M., & Olsen, L. E. (2010). Promising attributes and experiences. Journal of Advertising, 39, 65–77.
Schacter, D. L., & Tulving, E. (1994). What are the memory systems of 1994? In D. L. Schacter & E. Tulving (Eds.),Memory systems 1994. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Schlosser, A. E. (2003). Experiencing products in the virtual world: The role of goal and imagery influencing attitudes versus purchase intentions. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(September), 184–198.
Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search and attention. Psychological Review, 84, 1–66.
Shaw, J. S. I., McClure, K. A., & Wilkins, C. E. (2001). Recognition instructions and recognition practice can alter the confidence–response time relationship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 93–103.
Spears, N., & Yazdanparast, A. (2014). Revealing obstacles to the consumer imagination. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(3), 363-372.
Sweller, J., & Sweller, S. (2006). Natural information processing systems. Evolutionary Psychology, 4, 434–458.
Szpunar, K. K., & McDermott, K. B. (2008). Episodic future thought and its relation to remembering: Evidence from ratings of subjective experience. Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 330–334.
Van Dyne, L., & Pierce, J. L. (2004). Psychological ownership and feelings of possession: Three field studies predicting employee attitudes and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 439–459.
Weiss, L., & Johar, G. V. (2013). Egocentric categorization and product judgment: Seeing your traits in what you own (and their opposite in what you don't). Journal of Consumer Research, 40(1), 185-201.
Weiss, L., & Johar, G. V. (2016). Products as self-evaluation standards: When owned and unowned products have opposite effects on self-judgment. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(6), 915-930.
- Downloaded
- Viewed
- 0KCI Citations
- 0WOS Citations