바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Environment of Doing Business in East Asia : South Korean Experience

The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business / The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, (E)2233-5382
2016, v.7 no.1, pp.19-25
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.13106/ijidb.2016.vol7.no1.19.
Malek, Jihene
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to aim to stress the importance of doing business environment in South Korean economy. The theoretical justification is based on neo-institutional theories and new business management including Porter's Model as main justifications of state intervention due to the market failures to promote a competitive environment of doing business. Research design, data and methodology - The methods to be taken is to provide a comparative performance analysis, and offer in terms of doing business and economic freedom sub-index complemented by Korean reforms diagnostics. Results - The main results underlined the key factors explain the success of business environment in South Korea such as: a simplified registration procedures, a target tax incentives, the removal of business barriers, the improvement of legislative and regulatory framework, target reforms, property right and technical norms, good governance and the quality of institution, a role of a well-functioning legal framework, a strong competition framework, and the transparency of regulation, etc. Conclusion - A competitive environment of doing business is based on the target national strategies, appropriate reforms responding to national needs and good governance system.

keywords
Environment of Doing Business, Institutional Framework, Competitiveness, Competition Framework

Reference

1.

Alonso, J., & Garcimarti, C. (2010). The determinants of institutional quality. More on the debate, Journal of International Development, 25, 206–226. DOI:10.1002/jid.1710.

2.

Barro, R. J. (1990). Government spending in a simple model of endogenous growth. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 103-125.

3.

Beck, T., Demirguc-Kunt, A., & Levine, R. (2005). SMEs, growth, and poverty: Cross-country evidence, Journal of Economic Growth, 10(3), 199-229.

4.

Coase, Ronald H. (1998). The New Institutional Economics. American Economic Review, 88(2), 12-14.

5.

Dethier, J., Hirn, M., & Straub, S. (2010). Explaining enterprise performance in developing countries with business climate survey data. The World Bank Research Observer, 26, 258–309.

6.

Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, & Shleifer, A.(2003). Courts, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(2), 453-517.

7.

Doing Business (2015). Doing business index in South Korea. Retrieved May 17, 2015 from http://www.doingbusiness. org/data/exploreeconomies/korea/

8.

Doing Business (2016). Doing business index in South Korea. Retrieved September 5, 2016 from http://www.doingbusiness. org/reports/global-reports/doing-business-2016

9.

Esty, Daniel C., & Porter, Michael E. (2005). National Environmental Performance: An Empirical Analysis of Policy Results and Determinants. Environment and Development Economics, 10(4), 391–434.

10.

Freedom House (2015). South Korean Economic freedom index. Retrieved June11, 2015 from http://www.heritage.org/index/country/southkorea

11.

Glaeser, E., R. La Porta, F. Lopez-de-Silanes, & Shleifer, A.(2004). Do Institutions Cause Growth?. Journal of Economic Growth, 9(3), 271-303.

12.

Hausmann, Ricardo, Rodrik, Dani, & Velasco, Andrés (2007). Growth Diagnostics. Initiative for Policy Dialogue Working Paper Series. New York: Oxford University Press.

13.

Hoff, K., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1999). Modern Economic Theory and Development. Washington DC: World Bank.

14.

Kaufmann, Daniel, Kraay, Aart, & Mastruzzi, Massimo (2005). Governance Matters IV: Governance Indicators for 1996-2004. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 3630.

15.

Keesing, D., & Lall, Sanjaya. (1992). Marketing manufactured exports from developing countries: learning sequences and public support. Helleiner, G. (eds.). New York:Oxford University Press.

16.

Khan, Mushtaq H. (2008). Building Growth-Promoting Governance Capabilities. Background Paper for The Least Developed Countries Report 2008. UNCTAD:Geneva.

17.

Khan, Mushtaq H. (2013). Technology policies and learning with imperfect governance, in Stiglitz, Joseph and Justin Yifu Lin (eds.). The Industrial Policy Revolution I: The Role of Government Beyond Ideology (pp.79-115), London, UK: Palgrave.

18.

La Porta, R., López-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. & Vishny , R.(1999). The Quality of Government, Journal of Law. Economics and Organization, 15(1), 222-279.

19.

Meier, G., & Seers, D. (1988). Les pionniers du développement. Washington D.C.: World Bank.

20.

Moreau, F. (2004). The Role of the State in Evolutionary Microeconomics. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 28(6), 847-874.

21.

North, D. C. (1981). Structure and Change in Economic History. New York: Norton.

22.

North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

23.

North, D. C. (1991). Institutions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 97-112.

24.

North, D. C. (1992). Institutions and Economic Theory. American Economist, 36(1), 3–6..

25.

North, D. C. (1994). Economic Performance Through Time. The American economic review, 84(3), 359-368.

26.

OECD (2015). Korean Reforms diagnostics, Retrieved May 11, 2015 from http://www.oecd.org/korea/koreas-future-prosperity-depends-on-improving-relevance-of-education-andskills-to-labour-market.htm

27.

Porter, M. E. (1993). L’avantage concurrentiel des nations. Inter Editions Paris, 23, 302-310.

28.

Porter, M. E., & Linde, C. (1995). Toward a New Conception of the Environment Competitiveness Relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97-118.

29.

Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and Competition: New Agendas for Companies, Governments, and Institutions. In On Competition. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

30.

Porter, M. E., & Sakakibara, M. (2004). Competition in Japan. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18(1), 27-50.

31.

Rapport des Nations Unies (2014). Les objectifs du Millénaire du développent. New York: United Nation.

32.

Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A., & Trebbi, F. (2004). Institutions Rule: The Primacy of Institutions over Geography and Integration in Economic Development. Journal of Economic Growth, 9, 131-165.

33.

Stiglitz, J. E. (2002). Development Policies in a World of Globalization. A paper present at the seminar New International Trends for Economic Development (pp.12-13). Rio Janeiro, Brazil: Brazilian Economic and Social Development Bank (BNDES).

34.

UNCTAD (2009). The State and Development Governance. The Least Developed Countries Report, 2009, 8. The United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, New York: UNCTAD. Retrieved July 2, 2014, form http://unctad.org/en/docs/ldc2009_en.pdf

35.

UNCTAD Report (2014). Investment framework for sustainable development. Geneva, Switzerland. Retrieved July 2, 2014, form http://unctad.org/en/Pages/DIAE/World%20Investment %20Report/World_Investment_Report.aspx

36.

United Nations Report (2015). Global sustainable development Report 2015, 2015 Edition, Advanced unedited version. New York: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Division for Sustainable Development.

37.

Wade, R. (1990). Governing the market: Economic theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization. NJ: Princeton University Press.

The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business