Impact of Educational Service Information Distribution on Students’ Satisfaction and Achievement Rate

Min,, G. , & Loh,, J. (2016). Impact of Educational Service Information Distribution on Students’ Satisfaction and Achievement Rate. The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 7(4), 17-31, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.13106/ijidb.2016.vol7.no4.17.

copy

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this study is to discuss problems and propose the direction of the current international university placement program in the country by deriving the concept of and developing questionnaires for 'service satisfaction'. Research design, data, and methodology -The SERVQUAL scale was used to measure the quality of services. In this study reliability, empathy, and assurance are used to measure the quality of the international university placement system, considering the characteristics of the education environment. The survey data is based on responses from 280 students who either have completed the international university placement system and currently studying abroad, or are studying the domestic part of the program. Cronbach's Alpha value was calculated. To verify the hypothesis, the multiple regression analysis was conducted. Results - According to the study, the satisfaction rate of the domestic learning process is heavily relied on reliability and empathy; particularly empathy on the curriculum of the international placement program. The study also found that to make students to feel a high sense of achievement, the satisfaction rate is a priority which should be improved. Conclusions - The results from the analysis of the hypothesis shows that the satisfaction rate of students who are taking the domestic part of the international university placement program should be increased.

keywords: International University Placement Program, Educational Information Distribution, Satisfaction Rate, A Sense of Achievement

Reference

Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives:the Classification of Educational Goals:Handbook1, Cognitive domain. New York: McKay.

Cho, H. J. (2015). Effects of Education Service Quality on Relationship Management from the Service Distribution Perspective. Journal of Distribution Science, 13(3), 41-49.

Choi, H. S. (2008). A Study on the Effect of Parents and Relatives` Social Capital on the Students`Academic Achievements: Focusing on the First-Grade Students of High Schools in Seoul. Yonsei University graduate school Doctoral Thesis, 1-164.

Day‚ Ralph. L. (1984). Modeling Choices Among Alternative Responses to Dissatisfaction. Advances in Consumer Research‚ 11‚ 496-499.

Dodds‚ W. B., & Monroe, K. B. (1985). The Effect of Brand and Price Information on Subjective Product Evaluations. Advances in Consumer Research, 12‚85-90.

Gronroos, C. (1984). A Service Quality Model and Its Marketing Implication. European Journal of Marketing, 18(4), 37-40.

Gronroos, C. (1993). A Service Quality Model and It's Marketing Implication. European Journal of Marketing, 18(4), 36-44.

Ham, B. J. (2006). Marketing Management for The New Century. Seoul, Korea: Hyeongseol Publication.

Holbrook, Morris B., & Corfman, Kim P. (1985). Quality and value in the consumption experience:Phaedrus rides again. In Jacoby Jacob, Olson Jerry C. (eds.), Perceived quality: how consumers view stores and merchandise. MA: D.C.:Lexington.

10.

Jeong, S. Y. (2008). Study on Service Experience and the Definition of Quality Measurement Scale :Focusing on Banks and Hotels. Daejeon, Korea:KAIST Graduate school Master Thesis.

11.

Jung, C. Y., & Choe, R. G. (1998). Window version SPSS) Statistical Analysis Using SPSSWIN. Trade and Management.

12.

Kang, G. Y. (2013). An Influence of the Satisfaction on Factors related to Educational Services sales of Re-registration and the Word of Mouth. Journal of Distribution Science, 9(3), 15-23.

13.

Kim, S. l. (1994). The Goal of Education Reform is in the School. Korean Educational Development Institute, 87, 27-31.

14.

Kim, Y. S. (2008). Customer Satisfaction Theory. Seoul, Korea: Korean Studies Information.

15.

Parasuraman. A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). Problems and Strategies. Journal of Marketing, 49(1), 34-35.

16.

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml. V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A Multiple-Item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perception of Service Quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 16-17.

17.

Parasurman, A., Zeithaml V. A., & Berry, L. L.(1994). Reassessment of Expectations as a Comparison Standard in Measuring Service Quality:Implications for Further Research. Journal of Marketing, 58(1), 47.

18.

Parasuraman. A., Zeithaml V. A., & Berry, L. L.(1996). The Behavioral Consequences of Service Quality. Journal of Marketing, 60(2), 31-46.

19.

Lehtinen‚ U., & Lehtinen, J. R. (1991). Two Approaches to Service Quality Dimensions. The Service Industries Journal, 11(3), 287-303.

20.

Yi, Y. J. (1995). Study on The Definition and Measurement of Customer Satisfaction. Seoul National University Management Theory, 29(1-2), 145-168.

21.

Yi, Y. J. (2000). A Theoretical Examination of Customer Satisfaction Research: Findings and Outlook. Journal of Consumer Studies, 11(2), 139-166.

바로가기메뉴

Article Contents

Vol.7 No.4

Impact of Educational Service Information Distribution on Students’ Satisfaction and Achievement Rate

Abstract

Reference

The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business