바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • E-ISSN2233-5382
  • KCI

Output and Real Exchange Rate in Developing Countries: Evidence from China

The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business / The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, (E)2233-5382
2017, v.8 no.5, pp.7-13
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.13106/ijidb.2017.vol8.no5.7.
Huan, Xingang
He, Yugang

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to analyze the relationship between the real exchange rate and the output, which is based on the macroeconomic equilibrium theory in China. Its aim will be to verify whether the change in the real exchange rate has a significant effect on the output or not. Research design, data, and methodology - This study endeavors tries to investigate the correlation among economic variables under the macroeconomic market (the commodity market and the money market) equilibrium. So, time-series data from 1990 to 2016 is applied to establish a vector auto-regression (VAR) model so as to perform an empirical analysis. Results - The empirical results reveal that an increase in the real exchange rate will result in an increase in the output in the short run. However, the empirical results also indicate that this kind of mechanism cannot work in the long run. Conclusions - The effect of a decrease of real exchange rate on output is significant in the short run. Also, this paper suggests that the total supply and the total demand can promote economic growth. The fiscal and money policy play a significant role in economic growth in China as well.

keywords
Real Exchange Rate, Economic Growth, VAR Model

Reference

1.

Ardic, O. P. (2006). Output, the Real Exchange Rate, and the Crises in Turkey. Topics in Middle Eastern and North African Economies, MEEA Online Journal, 8, 445-456.

2.

Bahmani-Oskooee, M., & Hajilee, M. (2009). The J-Curve at industry level: Evidence from Sweden–US trade. Economic Systems, 33(1), 83-92.

3.

Bahmani-Oskooee, M., & Hegerty, S. W. (2009). The effects of exchange-rate volatility on commodity trade between the United States and Mexico. Southern Economic Journal, 75(4), 1019-1044.

4.

Bahmani-Oskooee, M., & Kandil, M. (2009). Are devaluations contractionary in MENA countries?. Applied Economics, 41(2), 139-150.

5.

Bleakley, H., & Cowan, K. (2008). Corporate dollar debt and depreciations: Much ado about nothing?. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 90(4), 612-626.

6.

Bleaney, M., & Vargas, L. C. (2009). Real exchange rates, valuation effects and growth in emerging markets. Open Economies Review, 20(5), 631.

7.

Blecker, R. A., & Razmi, A. (2007). The fallacy of composition and contractionary devaluations: output effects of real exchange rate shocks in semi-industrialized countries. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 32(1), 83-109.

8.

Di Nino, V., Eichengreen, B., & Sbracia, M. (2011). Real Exchange Rates, Trade, and Growth: Italy 1861-2011. Economic History Working Papers 10, Bank of Italy, Economic Research Department.

9.

Gala, P. (2007). Real exchange rate levels and economic development: theoretical analysis and econometric evidence. Cambridge Journal of economics, 32(2), 273-288.

10.

Gala, P., & Lucinda, C. R. (2006). Exchange rate misalignment and growth: old and new econometric evidence. Revista Economia, 7(4), 165-187.

11.

Pesaran, M. H. (2006). Estimation and inference in large heterogeneous panels with a multifactor error structure. Econometrica, 74(4), 967-1012.

12.

Rapetti, M., Skott, P., & Razmi, A. (2012). The real exchange rate and economic growth: are developing countries different?. International Review of Applied Economics, 26(6), 735-753.

13.

Rodrik, D. (2008). The real exchange rate and economic growth. Brookings papers on economic activity, 2008(2), 365-412.

The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business