- Apply for Authority
- E-ISSN2233-5382
- KCI
E-ISSN : 2233-5382
Motivations of Selecting Restaurants for Eating-out: Focus on Fashion Premium Outlets
- Downloaded
- Viewed
Abstract
Purpose - This research examined the effect of hedonic and utilitarian eating-out motivations on the evaluation of restaurant selection attributes in a fashion premium outlet. Additionally, the influence of experimental and functional attributes on customers' preference for hedonic eating-out motives and utilitarian eating-out motives, and variation of moderating effects through the gender was examined. Research design, data, and methodology - A survey was conducted to verify the established research hypothesis. The questionnaire items for the research were modified to fit the situation of the present study. In order to elaborate the questionnaire, the literature of the previous researchers was reviewed and supplemented. The survey conducted 207 online questionnaires for consumers who have visited domestic fashion premium outlets from July 4, 2017 to July 27, 2017. A total of 207 questionnaires were collected, and a total of 206 questionnaires were used for the empirical analysis after excluding one inappropriate response. In order to verify the reliability and validity of the measured variables, exploratory factor analysis and reliability analysis were performed using SPSS 20.0. Next, the structural equation model (SEM) statistical method was used to test the hypotheses of the study. Results - Hedonic motivation had more influence on experimental attribute importance than the functional attribute importance of the restaurant. However, this result was different depending on the gender. The effects of hedonic motives on empirical attributes were more influenced by female groups, and when influencing functional attributes, male groups were more influenced. However, it was statistically significant (p <0.05) in the female group only when the hedonic eating out motives influenced empirical attributes. Conclusions - This study analyzed the effect of eating-out motivation on the restaurant preference attributes and suggested practical implications. First, customers with hedonic eating-out motivations were evaluating experiential attributes to be more important than functional attributes. Second, for customers who are motivated to use practical eating-out habits, companies should provide services that meet practical and economic needs. In particular, female customers visiting restaurants need differentiated marketing strategies that make them feel new experiences rather than practical ones. In addition, it is necessary to study more complex and integrated studies which will influence restaurant selection attributes of premium outlets customers by adding various eating out motives and selection attributes.
- keywords
- Fashion Premium Outlet, Eating-Out Motivation, Restaurant Selection, Experimental Attributes, Functional Attributes
Reference
Babin, B. J., Darden, W. R., & Griffin, M. (1994). Work and/or fun: Measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(4), 644-656.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94.
Baker, J., Parasuraman, A., Grewal, D., & Voss, G. B. (2002). The influence of multiple store environment cues on perceived merchandise value and patronage intentions. Journal of Marketing, 66(2), 120-141.
Bearden, W. O., Sharma, S., & Teel, J. E. (1982). Sample size effects on chi square and other statistics used in evaluating causal models. Journal of Marketing Research, 425-430.
Bridges, E., & Florsheim, R. (2008). Hedonic and utilitarian shopping goals: The online experience. Journal of Business Research, 61(4), 309-314.
Cha, S. S., & Park, C. (2014). The Factors of Complex Shopping Mall Influencing Customer Satisfaction in Korea. Journal of Distribution Research, 19(4), 91-116.
Cha, S. S., & Park, C. (2017). Consumption Value Effects on Shopping Mall Attributes: Moderating Role of On/Off-line Channel Type. Journal of Distribution Science, 15, 5-12.
Cha, S. S., Oanh, V. T., & Yu, W. J.(2018). The Effect of Eating-Out Motives on Restaurant Attributes at Shopping Mall. Journal of Distribution Science, 16(1), 37-46.
Chandon, P., Wansink, B., & Laurent, G. (2000). A benefit congruency framework of sales promotion effectiveness. Journal of Marketing, 64(4), 65-81.
Chen, P. T., & Hu, H. H. (2010). The effect of relational benefits on perceived value in relation to customer loyalty: An empirical study in the Australian coffee outlets industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 29(3), 405-412.
Han, M. H., & Kim, K. J. (2008). Consumption value and eating out behavior of male and female undergraduate students. Consumer Policy Educ Rev, 4(3), 105-118.
Hirschman, E. C., & Holbrook, M. B. (1982). Hedonic consumption: Emerging concepts, methods and propositions. The Journal of Marketing, 46(3), 92-101.
Holbrook, M. B. (Ed.). (1999). Consumer Value: A framework for analysis and research. London:Routledge.
Jones, M. A., Reynolds, K. E., & Arnold, M. J. (2006). Hedonic and utilitarian shopping value:Investigating differential effects on retail outcomes. Journal of Business Research, 59(9), 974-981.
Kim, G. H., & Choi, M. S. (2014). A Study on the Important factors of the small and medium-sized urban outlets vitalization. Journal of the Residential Environment Institute of Korea, 12(2), 249-265.
Kim, H. S., & Ahn, Y. S. (2015). A Study on the Classification and Operation Systems of Fashion Offline Store. Journal of the Korea Fashion &Costume Design Association, 17(4), 173-189.
Kim, S. Y., & Kim, J. Y. (2002). Restaurant Food Choice and Preferences of Salaried Employees in JinJu Classified by Age and Gender. Journal of Nutrition, 35(9), 996-1006.
Ko, J. Y. (2007). Relationships between well-being perception and wine purchase choice attributes. The New York Times, 2003, 17.
Ko, J. Y., Song, H. J., & Woo, J. R. (2007). Segmenting female customers market visiting family restaurant through eating out motivation. Korean J. Foodservice Management Society, 10(1), 71-89.
Korea Chamber of Commerce and Industry (2017) Retail Data Base
Korea Fashion and Tex News (2017) Research Report.
Korea Rural Economic Institute. (2005) Research Report.
Kressmann, F., Sirgy, M. J., Herrmann, A., Huber, F., Huber, S., & Lee, D. J. (2006). Direct and indirect effects of self-image congruence on brand loyalty. Journal of Business Research, 59(9), 955-964.
Kwun, J. W., & Oh, H. (2004). Effects of brand, price, and risk on customers’ value perceptions and behavioral intentions in the restaurant industry. Journal of Hospitality & Leisure Marketing, 11(1), 31-49.
Lee, J. E., & Kim, Y. M. (2012). The Relationship Between Professional Baseball Spectators’Experiential Consumption, Consumption Emotion, Customer Satisfaction, Trust, Attitude toward Team and Revisit Intention. Journal of Sport and Leisure Studies, 47(1), 265-280.
Nunnally, J. C. (1967). Psychometric theory. New York:McGraw-Hill.
Overby, J. W., & Lee, E. J. (2006). The effects of utilitarian and hedonic online shopping value on consumer preference and intentions. Journal of Business Research, 59(10), 1160-1166.
Seiders, K., Berry, L. L., & Gresham, L. G. (2000). Attention, retailers! How convenient is your convenience strategy?. Sloan Management Review, 41(3), 79.
Shin, S. A. (2016). A study on the Effect of the Cognition of the Purpose Visiting Cafés, Customers’Consideration for Choosing Café, and Brands Features, on Preferred Brand: Based on Customers in twenties and thirties. Doctorial dissertation, Ewha Womans University.
Sirgy, M. J., Johar, J. S., Samli, A. C., & Claiborne, C. B. (1991). Self-congruity versus functional congruity: Predictors of consumer behavior. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 19(4), 363-375.
Spangenberg, E. R., Voss, K. E., & Crowley, A. E. (1997). Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian dimensions of attitude: A generally applicable scale. ACR North American Advances.
Yoo, C., & Yeo, J. (2010). Content Analyses on Marketing Studies in Korea: On Research Subject and Methodology (2000-2009). Journal of Consumer Studies, 21(2), 321-340.
- Downloaded
- Viewed
- 0KCI Citations
- 0WOS Citations