바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Strategy of Market Spread-Commercialization in EVs Industry : Visegrad and Nordic Countries

The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business / The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, (E)2233-5382
2018, v.9 no.3, pp.57-68
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.13106/ijidb.2018.vol9.no3.57.
Seo, Dae-Sung
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this study is to classify that the quality factors for comparing the Visegrard Group with the Nordic Council have historical similarities against Germany and the Soviet Union. However, this is because in the integrated European market, the competitiveness possessed by the two groups of countries is invested in the priority order to grow. Research design, data, and methodology - The study was conducted on the research design, and the reason for trying to compare the competence of the automobile industry in the assessment of industrial capability is that the Visegrard Group focuses on automotive production and the Nordic Association focuses on the commercialization of the automobile(market). In this study, searching and quantifying indirect evidence was made through standards are more complementary in Europe since each country acts like the role of the European automotive industry for example, which is different from the realistic evaluation criteria, are more important than those of the United States(first in the world) or Germany(first in Europe). Results - The results of this study are as follows: In the global EV market U.S.(export: $ 2.62 billion /share: 36.7%), Germany($ 1.29 billion /18.1%), France($ 390 million /5.4%), United Kingdom($ 380 million /5.4%), and South Korea($ 320 million/ 4.4%). South Korea's share of the EV market is 4.4%, while TSI reaches at +0.9 which measures the comparative advantage of a specific commodity in the world trade market. There is great potential for evaluated as products processing in export competition. But, commercialization, standardization, and overall market expansion did not have a positive impact on global satisfaction. Conclusions - EVs put importance on various utilities. So this suggests that Korea's exports to the EU, including the Visegrard Group, should be more focused on marketability when illuminating with a sharing industrial system under the European Union. It is necessary to specialize in manufacturing and commercialization by country(region) to prepare sharing economy and blockchain in order to create a smart-sharing city linked on artificial intelligence, as the commercialization of electric vehicles, which will have a larger growth rate than that of manufacturing in the fourth revolutionary era.

keywords
Manufacturing, Commercialization, EVs, Visegrad, Nordic, Smart City, Blockchain

Reference

1.

Ambroziak, Ł.(2012). Intra-Industry Trade of the Visegrad Countries: The Case of Automotive Industry. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wroclawiu, Part 1(267), 11-24.

2.

Chodkowska-Miszczuk, J., Kulla, M., & Novotny, L.(2017). The role of energy policy in agricultural biogas energy production in Visegrad countries. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-Economic Series. 35(35), 19-34.

3.

Coo, B. M.(2017). Developing SMEs’ Export Success Factors for Distribution Reinforcement. Journal of Distribution Science, 15(10), 65-80.

4.

Coo, B. M., & Seo, D. S.(2016). A Study of Business Model of Logistics O2O Industry - Focused on Korean Freight Information Network Business. Korea Logistics Review, 26(6), 13-23.

5.

Graabak, I., Wu, Q., & Warland, L., & Liu, Z.(2016). Optimal planning of the Nordic transmission system with 100% electric vehicle penetration of passenger cars by 2050. Energy, 107(1), 648-660.

6.

Harnisch, S., Frank, C., & Maull, H.(2011). Routledge Advances in International Relations and Global Politics. London: Routledge.

7.

International Visegrad Fund(2006). Visegrad Group? Central European Constellation. Warsaw: Adam Mickiewicz Institute press.

8.

International Visegrad Fund(2013). EU Integration Issues-Visegrad Countries and the South. Warsaw:Caucasian Institute for Economic and Social Research press.

9.

International Visegrad Fund(2011). Two Decades of Visegrad cooperation. Bratislava: IVF press.

10.

International Visegrad Fund(2013). EU Integration Issues-Visegrad Countries and the South. Caucasian Institute for Economic and Social Research press. Two Decades of Visegrad cooperation. Bratislava:IVF press. Visegrad Group – Central European Constellation. Warsaw: Adam Mickiewicz Institute press.

11.

International Visegrad Fund(2015). official website, Annual report of the V4 Presidency. Retrieved March 26, 2015 from http://visegradfund.org/?download=down loads/media/annual_reports/ivf_Visegrad-Fund15.pdf.

12.

International Visegrad Fund(2015). Official Website, Annual report of the V4 Presidency. Retrieved March 26, 2015 from http://visegradfund.org/?download=down loads/media/annual_reports/ivf_Visegrad-Fund15.pdf.

13.

International Visegrad Fund(2017). Official website, Annual report of the V4 Presidency. Retrieved October 10, 2017 from http://visegradfund.org/?download=downloads/media/annual_reports/ivf_Visegrad-Fund 17.pdf.

14.

Kim, H. S., & Shim, J. H.(2017). The Effects of Service Qualities on Customer Satisfaction and Behavioral Intention in Coffee Shops. International Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 8(5), 95-109.

15.

KITA(2017). K-stat. Retrieved October 10, 2017 from http://stat.kita.net/stat/cstat/multy/MultyPeriodCtrList.s creen.

16.

Kurekova, L., Salner, A., & Farenzenová, M.(2013). Implementation of Activation Works in Slovakia:Evaluation and Recommendations for Policy Change. Bratislava: Slovak Governance Institute.

17.

Leggett, D.(2015). Sweden: Volvo Cars plans electric car for 2019, Aroq–Just-Auto. Global News, 4-4.

18.

Market Line.(2016). Norway – Hybrid & Electric Cars. London: United Kingdom.

19.

Newby, A. G.(2009). In Building a Nation Few Better Examples can be Found: Norden and the Scottish Parliament. Scandinavian Journal of History, 34(3), 307-329.

20.

OECD(2016). Global EV Outlook 2016-Two million and counting, Retrieved November 1, 2016http://www.oecd.org/publications/global-ev-outlook-2017-9789264278882-en.htm.

21.

OECD(2017a). OECD Economic Outlook: Statistics and Projections(database). Retrieved October 16, 2017from https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=EO93_INTERNET.

22.

OECD(2017b). Global EV Outlook 2017-Two million and counting, Retrieved November 22, 2017http://www.oecd.org/publications/global-ev-outlook-2017-9789264278882-en.htm.

23.

Panico, C.(2017). Strategic interaction in alliances. Strategic Management Journal. 38(8), 1646-1667.

24.

SARIO(2015). Automotive Sector in Slovakia(Slovak Investment and Trade Development Agency). Bratislava: Automotive Industry Association of the Slovak Republic(ZAP SR).

25.

Seo, D. S.(2017). The investment point on cooperative innovation in EVs for the spoke-smart cities:Focused on Nordic countries and Korea. The Journals of Economics, Marketing & Management, 5(3), 1-11.

26.

Seo, D. S.(2014). The Expansion Strategy for New Route between Korea-Hungary. Journal of Distribution Science. 12(6), 59-65.

27.

Seo, D. S.(2015). Central Eastern Europe’s Pattern of Industrial Development and Regional Structure in Market Distribution. Journal of Distribution Science. 13(6), 17-23.

28.

UN(2017). The United Nations Commodity Trade Statistics Database. Retrieved November 22, 2017 from https://comtrade.un.org/data.

The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business