바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

E-ISSN : 2233-5382

Article Contents

Next
e-Submission

Vol.9 No.9
Citation Share

A Study on the Determinants of Social Welfare: Evidence from Macroeconomics

The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business / The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, (E)2233-5382
2018, v.9 no.9, pp.7-14
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.13106/ijidb.2018.vol9.no9.7.
He, Yugang
Feng, Wang
He,, Y. , & Feng,, W. (2018). A Study on the Determinants of Social Welfare: Evidence from Macroeconomics. The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 9(9), 7-14, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.13106/ijidb.2018.vol9.no9.7.
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

Purpose - Social welfare is a social insurance system that provides funds and services for all citizens to maximize their life quality. Its ultimate goal is to alleviate social contradictions. Therefore, this paper explores the determinants of social welfare in terms of macroeconomics. Research design, data, and methodology - Based on the vector error correction model, the annual time series from 1990 to 2017 will be used to conduct an empirical analysis. The real GDP, the real income, the inflation and the degree of openness will be treated as independent variables. The input of social welfare will be treated as a dependent variable. These variables will be used to perform the cointegration test and the vector error correction model to explore how the macroeconomic variables affect social welfare both in long run and short run. Result - Via the empirical analysis, it can be summarized that the real GDP, the real income and the degree of openness are the driving determinants to enlarge the social welfare. Conversely, the inflation is the obstructive determinant to reduce the social welfare. Conclusion - The positive and negative determinants of social welfare exist simultaneously, China's government should take macroeconomic regulation and control to balance them to enlarge social welfare.

keywords
Social Welfare, Macroeconomics, Determinants

Reference

1.

Atalla, T. N., Gasim, A. A., & Hunt, L. C. (2018). Gasoline demand, pricing policy, and social welfare in Saudi Arabia: A quantitative analysis. Energy Policy, 114, 123-133.

2.

Chen, Z. Y., & Nie, P. Y. (2016). Effects of carbon tax on social welfare: A case study of China. Applied energy, 183, 1607-1615.

3.

Fleurbaey, M. (2015). On sustainability and social welfare. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 71, 34-53.

4.

Hafer, R. W. (2017). New estimates on the relationship between IQ, economic growth and welfare. Intelligence, 61, 92-101.

5.

Huang, C. Y., Yang, Y., & Cheng, C. C. (2017). The growth and welfare analysis of patent and monetary policies in a Schumpeterian economy. International Review of Economics & Finance, 52, 409-426.

6.

Ivankina, L., & Latygovskaya, T. (2015). Modern social welfare in the light of the sustainability model. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 166, 111-115.

7.

Jung, M. H., & Kim, E. J. (2014). Family solidarity between old parents and adult children, welfare distribution, and suicidal ideation of elderly. Journal of Distribution Science, 12(8), 91-102.

8.

Kassie, M., Stage, J., Diiro, G., Muriithi, B., Muricho, G., Ledermann, S. T., & Zeyaur, K. (2018). Push–pull farming system in Kenya: Implications for economic and social welfare. Land Use Policy, 77, 186-198.

9.

Kim, M. J. (2015). Effects of work environment on job satisfaction and spontaneity care workers at social welfare facilities. Journal of Distribution Science, 13(8), 49-59.

10.

Li, Q., Shim, M., & Wen, Y. (2017). The implication of subsistence consumption for economic welfare. Economics Letters, 158, 30-33.

11.

Menegaki, A. N., & Tugcu, C. T. (2018). Two versions of the Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare (ISEW) in the energy-growth nexus for selected Asian countries. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 14, 21-35.

12.

Menegaki, A. N., Marques, A. C., & Fuinhas, J. A. (2017). Redefining the energy-growth nexus with an index for sustainable economic welfare in Europe. Energy, 141, 1254-1268.

13.

Myojo, S., & Ohashi, H. (2018). Effects of consumer subsidies for renewable energy on industry growth and social welfare: The case of solar photovoltaic systems in Japan. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 48, 55-67.

14.

Ondetti, G. (2016). The social function of property, land rights and social welfare in Brazil. Land Use Policy, 50, 29-37.

15.

Perc, M., Petek, O., & Kamal, S. M. (2014). Impact of density and interconnectedness of influential players on social welfare. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 249, 19-23.

16.

Pivato, M. (2013). Social welfare with incomplete ordinal interpersonal comparisons. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 49(5), 405-417.

17.

Rouhani, O. M., Geddes, R. R., Gao, H. O., & Bel, G. (2016). Social welfare analysis of investment public–private partnership approaches for transportation projects. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 88, 86-103.

18.

Sadeghi, H., Abdollahi, A., & Rashidinejad, M. (2015). Evaluating the impact of FIT financial burden on social welfare in renewable expansion planning. Renewable Energy, 75, 199-209.

19.

Um, K. H., & Kim, J. W. (2015) Effects of Child Welfare Service Quality Delivery and Customer Satisfaction from the Service Distribution Perspective. Journal of Distribution Science, 13(8), 91-96.

The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business

e-Submission OA Policy