바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Archival Studies in North America: Current Developments and Trends

Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management / Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, (P)1598-1487; (E)2671-7247
2011, v.11 no.2, pp.77-94
https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2011.11.2.077

  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

In this article, the author introduces the paradigm shift in archival studies that occurs in north America. Although the dominant paradigm in the archival studies-the positivism paradigm-greatly contributed to build modern archives in Europe and north America, during last decades, new ideas and technologies led the archival communities to re-identify their social roles and powers and to adopt new values of archives and archivist. This essay argues that this changes is essential to our future and we understand the nature of the changes from the broader interdisciplinary perspective of archives studies, information studies, and history.

keywords
archival paradigm shift, archival principles, interdisciplinary research, history, information studies, 기록관리의 다원화, 기록학 원칙, 학제간 연구, 기록학, 역사학, 문헌정보학

Reference

1.

Abraham, Terry. (1991). Collection policy or documentation strategy: Theory and practice. American Archivist, 54, 44-52.

2.

Alexander, Philip N.. (1987). The Roots of 128: A hypothetical documentation strategy. American Archivist, 50, 518-531.

3.

Bastian, Jeannette. (2006). Towards the development of an archival core curriculum: The united states and canada. Archival Science, 6, 133-150.

4.

Bearman, David. (1996). Grounding archival description in the functional requirements for evidence. Archivaria, 42, 28-45.

5.

Blouin Jr., Francis. (2007). Archives, documentation and institutions of social memory: Eassay from the sawyer seminar:University of Michigan Press.

6.

Brothman, Brien. (1991). Orders of value: Probing the theoretical terms of archival practice. Archivaria, 32, 78-100.

7.

Brothman, Brien. (2001). The past that archives keep: Memory, history and the preservation of archival records. Archivaria, 51, 64-97.

8.

Capurro, R.. (1992). What is information science for? A philosophical reflection, in P. Vakkari and B. Cronin, ed.: Conceptions of library and information science: Historical, empirical and theoretical perspectives:Taylor Graham.

9.

Cook, Terry. (1984). From information to knowledge: An intellectual paradigm for archives. Archivaria, 19, 28-49.

10.

Cook, Terry. (1987). Archival science and postmodernism: New formulations for old concepts. Archival Science, 1, 3-24.

11.

Cook, Terry. (1992). Documentation strategy. Archivaria, 34, 181-191.

12.

Cook, Terry. (1992). Mind of matter: Towards a new theory of archival appraisal, In The archival imagination: Essays in honour of hugh a. Taylor:Association of Canadian Archivists.

13.

Cook, Terry. (1997). What is past is prologue: A history of archival ideas since 1898, and the future paradigm shift. Archivaria, 43, 17-63.

14.

Cook, Terry. (2002). Archives, records, and power: From (postmodern) theory to (archival) performance. Archival Science, 2, 171-185.

15.

Cox, Richard. (1989). A documentation strategy case study: Western new york. American Archivist, 52, 192-200.

16.

Craig, Barbara. (2002). Selected themes in the literature on memory and their pertinence to archives. American Archivist, 65, 276-289.

17.

Cronin, Blaise. (2008). The sociological turn in information science. Journal of Information Science, 34, 465-475.

18.

Darnton, Robert. (1984). The Great Cat Massacre and Other Episodes in French Cultural History:Basic Books.

19.

Davenport, Elisabeth. (2008). Social informatics and sociotechnical research: A view from the UK. Journal of Information Science, 34, 519-530.

20.

Day, Ronald. (2000). The conduit metaphor and the nature and politics of information studies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51, 805-811.

21.

Day, Ronald. (2001). The Modern Invention of Information: Discourse, History, and Power:Southern Illinois University Press.

22.

Derrida, Jaque. (1996). Archives Fever: A Freudian Impression.

23.

Dollar, Charles. (1993). Archivists and records managers in the information age. Archivaria, 36, 37-52.

24.

Duff, Wendy. (2002). Stories and names: Archival description asnarrating records and constructing meanings. Archival Science, 2, 263-285.

25.

Duff, Wendy. (1990). The reclamation of archival description: The canadian perspective. Archivaria, 31, 26-35.

26.

Duranti, Luciana. (1995). Reliability and authenticity: The concepts and their implications. Archivaria, 39, 5-10.

27.

Eastwood, Terry. (2010). Currents of archival thinking:ABC-CLIO.

28.

Funer, Jonathern. (2010). Philosophy and information studies. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST), 44, 161-200.

29.

Gilliland, Anne. (2005). Communities of memories: Pluralizing archival research and educaion agendas. Archives and Manuscripts, 33, 146-174.

30.

Gilliland, Anne. (2008). Pluralizing the archival paradigm: Can archival education in pacific rim communities address the challenge. American Archivist, 71, 87-117.

31.

Gilliland, Anne. (2011). From Machine readable to digital records in Telling Stories about Stories: The Archives in a Digital Age.

32.

Ginzburg, Carlo. (1980). Cheese and the Worms: The Cosmos of a Sixteenth Century Miller:Johns Hopkins University Press.

33.

Hackman, L. J.. (1987). The documentation strategy process - a model and a case-study. American Archivist, 50, 12-47.

34.

Harman, D.. (2006). Trec: Overview. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 40, 113-155.

35.

Harris, Verne. (1997). Claiming less, delivering more: A critique of positivist formulations on archives in south africa. Archivaria, 44, 132-141.

36.

Harris, Verne. (2011). Jacques derrida meets nelson mandela: Archival ethics at the endgame. Archival Science, 11, 113-124.

37.

Harris, Verne. (2007). Archives and Justice: A South African Perspective:Society of American Archivists.

38.

Haworth, Kent. (1993). The voyage of rad: From the old world to the new. Archivaria, 35, 55-64.

39.

Hedstrom, Margaret. (1993). The electronic records challenge. History News, 48, 5-8.

40.

Hensen, Steven. (1991). Rad, mad, and APPM: The search for anglo-american standards for archival description. Archives and Museum Informatics, 5, 2-5.

41.

Hensen, Steven. (1997). ‘NISTF II’ and ead: The evolution of archival description. The American Archivist, 60, 284-296.

42.

Hinding, Andrea. (1993). Inventing a concept of documentation. The Journal of American History, 80, 168-178.

43.

Ketelaar, Eric. (1997). The difference best postponed?: Cultures and comparative archival science. Archivaria, 44, 142-148.

44.

Ketelaar, Eric. (1999). Archivalization and archiving. Archives and Manuscripts, 27, 54-61.

45.

Ketelaar, Eric. (2002). Archival temples, archival prisons: Modes of power and protection. Archival Science, 2, 221-238.

46.

McKemmish, Sue. (1993). Archival Documents: Providing Accountability Through Recordkeeping.

47.

McLaughlin, Robert Bishop. (1989). The evaluation of historical photographs: Considerations for visual resource curators and librarians in Museums and Archives:Art Documentation Summer.

48.

Srinivasan, Ramesh. (2006). The south asian web: An emerging community information system in the south asian diaspora (-). Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Participatory Design: Expanding Boundaries in Design.

49.

Swift, Michael. (1982). The canadian archival science in the 1970s: Current developments and trends. Archivaria, 15, -.

Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management