바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

메뉴

The hidden side of altruistic consumption: Balancing egoistic and altruistic motives

Abstract

Past studies suggest that altruistic (vs. egoistic) consumption in a preceding purchase situation can be negatively associated with altruistic (vs. egoistic) consumption in the subsequent purchase situation, which results from moral-self concept regulation. The goal of this study was thus to examine whether pursuing others’ (vs. one’s own) benefits in a preceding consumption situation can decrease (vs. increase) altruistic consumption in the subsequent purchase situation. In addition, the study investigated the effect of prior altruistic (vs. egoistic) consumption and altruism on the subsequent altruistic consumption. The results indicated that when the participants pursued their own benefits (vs. others’ benefits) in a preceding consumption situation, they were more likely to pursue others’ benefits (vs. their own benefits) in the subsequent consumption situation. However, there was not a significant difference of satisfaction on their decisions between two prior consumption conditions (pursuing their own benefits vs. others’ benefits). As participants were altruistic, they tried to pursue others’ benefits in the subsequent consumption situation at the aggregate level. Interestingly, when participants considered others’ benefits in a preceding consumption situation, their altruism was positively associated with the degree to which they tried to pursue others’ benefits in the subsequent consumption situation. By contrast, participants’ altruism was not related with the degree to which they tried to pursue others’ benefits in the subsequent consumption situation when they considered their own benefits in the preceding consumption situation.

keywords
altruistic consumption, altruism, moral-self concept regulation, moral licensing, moral cleansing

Reference

1.

구동모 (2000). 사회․개인규범, 행동결과중요성지각이 환경친화제품구매․재활용행동에 미치는 영향. 한국마케팅저널, 2(2), 86- 113.

2.

박미혜, 강이주 (2009). 윤리적 소비의 개념 및 실태에 대한 고찰. 한국생활과학회지, 18(5), 1047-1062

3.

이병관, 최명일 (2008). 새로운 미디어 공공 캠페인으로서 교육적-오락물의 설득 효과에 대한 탐구: 텔레비전 프로그램의 장기기증에 대한 개인의 태도와 행동에 미치는 영향. 광고학 연구, 19(1), 75-97.

4.

제미경, Weagley, R. O. (2007). 한국대학생과 미국대학생의 상거래 소비자 비윤리와 영향요인 비교분석. 소비자정책교육연구, 3(2), 83-99.

5.

한경닷컴 (2013, 2, 27). 이왕이면 ‘다홍치마’ 착한소비가 뜬다!. http://wstarnews.hankyung. com/ apps/news?popup=0&nid=08&c1=08 &c2=08&c3=00&nkey=201302262006061&mode=sub_view에서 2013, 9, 29 자료 얻음.

6.

한덕웅 (1992). 성격특성 용어의 사용 빈도, 호오도 및 사회적 바람직성. 한국심리학회지, 11(1), 147-171.

7.

한덕웅, 성한기, 강혜자, 이경성, 최훈석, 박군석, 김금미, 장은영 (2005). 사회심리학. 서울: 학지사

8.

Aquino, K., & Reed, A. (2002). The self- importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1423- 1440.

9.

Bailey, J. A. (2003). Self-image, self-concept, and self-identity revisited. Journal of the National Medical Association, 95(5), 383-386.

10.

Batson, C. D. (1990). How social an animal: The human capacity for caring. American Psychologist, 45(3), 336-346.

11.

Batson, C. D. (1991). The altruism question: Toward a social-psychological answer (pp.33-42). Hillsdale, NJ: Eribaum.

12.

Batson, C. D., & Powell, A. A. (2003). Altruism and prosocial behavior. In T. Millon, M. J. Lerner, & I. B. Weiner (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Personality and social psychology (pp. 463-483). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

13.

Batson, C. D., & Shaw, L. L. (1991). Evidence for altruism: Toward a pluralism of prosocial motives. Psychological Inquiry, 2(2), 107-122.

14.

Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 139-168.

15.

Blasi, A. (1983). Moral cognition and moral action: A theoretical perspective. Developmental review, 3(2), 178-210.

16.

Buck, R. (2002). The genetics and biology of true love: Prosocial biological affects and the left hemisphere. Psychological Review, 109(4), 739- 744.

17.

Chen, C. (2001). Design for the environment: A quality-based model for green product development. Management Science, 47(2), 250- 263.

18.

Cornelissen, G., Bashshur, M. R., Rode, J., & Le Menestrel, M. (2013). Rules or consequences? The role of ethical mind-sets in moral dynamics. Psychological Science, 24(4), 482-488.

19.

Dunning, D. (2007). Self-Image motives and consumer behavior: How sacrosanct self-beliefs sway preferences in the marketplace. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(4), 237-249.

20.

Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2003). The nature of human altruism. Nature, 425(6960), 785-791.

21.

Fisher, R. J., & Price, L. L. (1992). An investigation into the social context of early adoption behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(3), 477-486.

22.

Gino, F., Norton, M. I., & Ariely, D. (2010). The counterfeit self: The deceptive costs of faking it. Psychological Science, 21(5), 712-720.

23.

Heine, S. J., Lehman, D. R., Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1999). Is there a universal need for positive self-regard? Psychological Review, 106(4), 766-794.

24.

Hopper, J. R., & Nielsen, J. M. (1991). Recycling as altruistic behavior: normative and behavioral strategies to expand participation in a community recycling program. Environment and Behavior, 23(2), 195-220.

25.

Jordan, J., Mullen, E., & Murnighan, J. K. (2011). Striving for the moral self: The effects of recalling past moral actions on future moral behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(5), 701-713.

26.

Khan, U., & Dhar, R. (2006). Licensing effect in consumer choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(2), 259-266.

27.

Kleinginna, P. R., & Kleinginna, A. M. (1981). A categorized list of motivation definitions, with a suggestion for a consensual definition. Motivation and Emotion, 5(3), 263-291.

28.

Kouchaki, M. (2011). Vicarious moral licensing: The influence of others’ past moral actions on moral behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(4), 702-715.

29.

Markus, H. & Wurf, E. (1987). The dynamic self-concept: A social psychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 299-337.

30.

Mazar, N., & Zhong, C. B. (2010), Do green products make us better people? Psychological Science, 21(4), 494-498.

31.

Monin, B., & Jordan, A. H. (2009). The dynamic moral self: A social psychological perspective. In D. Narvaez & D. K. Lapsley (Eds.), Personality, identity, and character: Explorations in moral psychology (pp.341-354). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

32.

Monroe, K. R. (1996). The altruistic perspective: perceptions of a shared humanity. In K. R. Monroe (Ed.), The heart of altruism: Perceptions of a common humanity (pp.197-216). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

33.

Myers, D. G. (2010). Social psychology (pp.440-480). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

34.

Nisan, M. (1990). Moral balance: A model of how people arrive at moral decisions. In T. E. Wren (Ed.), The moral domain: Essays in the ongoing discussion between philosophy and the social sciences (pp.283-314). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

35.

Nisan, M. (1991). The moral balance model: Theory and research extending our understanding of moral choice and deviation. In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Geriwitz (Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development (Vol. 3, pp.213-250). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum associates.

36.

Obermiller, C., Burke, C., Talbott, E., & Green, G. P. (2009). ‘Taste great or more fulfilling’: The effect of brand reputation on consumer social responsibility advertising for fair trade coffee. Corporate Reputation Review, 12(2), 159- 176.

37.

Osterhus, T. L. (1997). Pro-social consumer influence strategies: When and how do they work? Journal of Marketing, 61(4), 16-29.

38.

Penner, L. A., Dovidio, J. F., Piliavin, J. A., & Schroeder, D. A. (2005). Prosocial behavior: Multilevel perspectives. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 365-392.

39.

Piliavin, J. A., & Charng, H. W. (1990). Altruism: A review of recent theory and research. Annual Review of Sociology, 16, 27-65.

40.

Richins, M. L. (1994). Valuing things: The public and private meanings of possessions. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(3), 504-521.

41.

Rushton, J. P. (1981). The altruistic personality. In J. P. Rushton & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Altruism and helping behavior: Social, personality, and developmental perspectives (pp.251-266). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

42.

Rushton, J. P., Fulker, D. W., Neale, M. C., Nias, D. K. B., & Eysenck, H. J. (1986). Altruism and aggression: The heritability of individual differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(6), 1192-1198.

43.

Sachdeva, S., Iliev, R., & Medin, D. L. (2009). Sinning saints and saintly sinners: The paradox of moral self-regulation. Psychological Science, 20(4), 523-528.

44.

Schwartz, S. H., & Howard, J. A. (1981). A normative decision-making model of altruism. In J. P. Rushton & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Altruism and helping behavior: Social, personality, and developmental perspectives (pp.189-211). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

45.

Shorr, D. N. (1993). Children’s perceptions of other’s kindness in helping: The endocentric motivations of pride and guilt. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 154(3), 363-374.

46.

Suh, J., & Yi, Y. (2006). When brand attitudes affect the customer satisfaction-loyalty relation: The moderating role of product involvement. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(2), 145-155.

47.

Sparks, P., & Shepherd, R. (1992). Self-identity and the theory of planned behavior: Assessing the role of identification with “Green Consumerism” Social Psychology Quarterly, 55(4), 388-399.

48.

Young, L., Chakroff, A., & Tom, J. (2012). Doing good leads to more good: The reinforcing power of a moral self-concept. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 3(3), 325-334.

49.

Zhong, C., Liljenquist, K. A., & Cain, D. M. (2009). Moral self-regulation: Licensing and compensation. In D. De Cremer (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on ethical behavior and decision making (pp.75-89). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

logo