바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

김밥의 자가품질검사 항목설정의 합리화 방안

Ways to Improve the Efficiency of the Self Quality Inspection Analysis for RTE Kimbab

The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business(JIDB) / The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, (E)2233-5382
2019, v.10 no.9, pp.37-43
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.13106/ijidb.2019.vol10.no9.37
김선아 (Department of Food and Resource Economics, Korea University)
임송수 (Department of Food and Resource Economics, Korea University)
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

초록

이 논문은 즉석섭취식품으로 분류되는 김밥용 김에 관한 자가품질검사의 개선안을 제시하였다. 김밥용 김에 적용하는 검사항목 중 장염비브리오균은 3가지 측면에서 적합하지 않다. 첫째, 선행연구 가운데 김밥용 김에서 장염비브리오균을 발견한 사례가 전무하다. 둘째, 전수조사 성격의 자가품질검사 부정합 내역(2015~16년)에 김밥용 김이 적시된 적이 없다. 셋째, 국제기준인 CODEX 규정은 해조류에 장염비브리오균 검사 의무를 부여하지 않는다. 끝으로, 수출용 김과 조미김 및 기타 수산물가공품 유형에 해당 검사가 면제된다. 이에 따라 김밥용 김에 대한 장염비브리오균 검사의무의 면제는 타당하며 그에 따른 경제적 이득은, 특히 영세업체에 클 것으로 추정된다. 2018년 3월 중 총 75곳의 자가품질 검사기관에 대한 전화 및 서류조사 결과 업체당 수수료 절약 규모는 업체당 연평균 13만 원에 이를 것으로 산출하였다. 또한, 검사의 투명성과 효율을 제고하기 위해서는 검사기관 간 수수료의 조화가 필요할 것으로 판명되었다.

keywords
Self quality inspection analysis, Dried laver, Vibrio parahaemolyticus, Kimbab

Abstract

Purpose - The self quality inspection which is mandatory in Republic of Korea can play an important role in promoting food safety, but the cost for self quality inspection is also a big burden especially for small businesses. In addition, excessive or duplicated inspection costs resulting from the standard gaps of various ministries and agencies ultimately effect negative social utility. Thus, this paper aims to suggest ways to improve the analysis of self quality inspection for the Ready-to-Eat Foods in terms of dried laver, in order to reduce costs caused by overinclusion. Research design, data, and methodology - The focus of interest is seaweed in Kimbab, which is to be exempted from the Vibrio parahaemolyticus test on the three grounds. First, existing literature provides little support for the necessity of performing a microbiological test. Second, laver products do not require the V.parahaemolyticus test by international standards such as the CODEX. Third, no case was found for seaweed products on the list of information on failed food items over the 2015~16 period. Results - Other types of seaweed such as exportable and seasoning seaweed are not subject to the test. Hence, exclusion of the V.pahaemolyticus test on seaweed is a valid point, bringing about large expected cost savings to many small businesses. Conclusions - Based on a complete survey of 75 food-testing agencies from March 20th to 30th, 2018, this paper finds that the proposed revision of the Kimbab test is likely to save an average of 130,000 won per business per year. Especially, in the case of the testing fee of Salmonella spp.(n,c,m,M), the cost difference by agencies was found to be up to five times. The regional gap in testing fees can be considered an unfair barrier. Accordingly, it is necessary to examine whether the testing fee is set at an appropriate level through the cost-extraction program proposed by the Ministry Food and Drug Safety. Hence, the survey results also point out that harmonization of testing fees charged by different food-testing agencies is appropriate with respect to transparency and efficiency.

keywords
Self quality inspection analysis, Dried laver, Vibrio parahaemolyticus, Kimbab

참고문헌

1.

Choi, E. S., Kim, N. H., Kim, H. W., Kim, S. A., Jo, J. I., Kim, S. H., & Rhee, M. S. (2014). Microbiological Quality of Seasoned Roasted Laver and Potential Hazard Control in a Real Processing Line. Journal of Food Protection, 77(12), 2069-2075. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-14-177

2.

Codex (2017). Regional Standard for laver products CXS 323R-2017: Essential Composition and Quality Factors. Retrieved May 22, 2019, from https://bit.ly/2Gym8eV.

3.

Encyclopedia of food and Nutrition (2018). Fishery products. Retrieved May 25, 2019, from https://bit.ly/2P3HJoi.

4.

Encyclopedia of food science and technology. (2018). Fishery products. Retrieved May 22, 2019, from https://bit.ly/2NaRH4I.

5.

Enforcement Decree Of The Food Sanitation Act. (2017)12 Attached table. Retrieved May 22, 2019, from https://bit.ly/2KU6IVX.

6.

Enforcement Decree Of The Food Sanitation Act. (2017)Article 31. Amended by Presidential Decree No. 15277. Retrieved May 20, 2019 from https://bit.ly/2z3miJa.

7.

Son, K.-T., Lach, T., Jung, Y., Kang, S.-K., Eom, S.-H., Lee, D.-S., & Kim, Y.-M. (2014). Food Hazard Analysis During Dried-laver Processing. Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 17(2), 197-201. doi: 10.5657/fas.2014.0197

8.

Lee, W. W. (2008). Deregulation and regulatory reform:Legal policy tasks to achieve the right regulatory policy. Justice, 106, 355-389p.

9.

Lee, W. W. (2008). Studies on Food Safety Law I. Seoul. Korea: Kyung-In Publishing.

10.

Ministry Food and Drug Safety (2004). Evaluation of current self quality inspection rules for foods(Report of Hanyang University). Retrieved May 22, 2019, from https://bit.ly/2Z8TsSc.

11.

Ministry Food and Drug Safety (2011). A study on the improvement of efficiency for self quality inspection analysis by establishing the test categories(Report of Korea University). Retrieved May 22, 2019, from https://rnd.mfds.go.kr/#!RDIAA01F01View.

12.

Ministry Food and Drug Safety (2015). Improvement measures of self-quality inspection rules for food(Report of Korea Food Communication Forum). Retrieved May 22, 2019, from https://bit.ly/2Z8TsSc.

13.

Ministry Food and Drug Safety (2018). 2017 Food and Drug Statistical Yearbook (p.50).

14.

Ministry Food and Drug Safety (2018). Status of Food and Livestock Testing and Inspection Agency. Retrieved May 22, 2019, from https://bit.ly/2z6D4ag.

15.

Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (2016). Korea Food Code. Amended by Notification No. 2016-153.

16.

Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (2018). Korea Food Code. Amended by Notification No. 2018-18.

17.

Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries (2017). Korean Laver Wins Recognized as the World's First International Standard for Seafood. Retrieved May 22, 2019, from https://bit.ly/2YYXVf9.

18.

Open Data Potal (2018) Inadequate food inspection information services. Retrieved May 22, 2019, from https://bit.ly/2YTzj7z.

19.

SBS CNBC (2017). The average price of Gimbap in Seoul is 2,140 won. Retrieved May 22, 2019, from https://bit.ly/2KW8eXk.

The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business(JIDB)