바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

E-ISSN : 2233-5382

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.11 No.12
Citation Share

Effects of Smart Factory Quality Characteristics and Dynamic Capabilities on Business Performance: Mediating Effect of Recognition Response

Effects of Smart Factory Quality Characteristics and Dynamic Capabilities on Business Performance: Mediating Effect of Recognition Response

The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business(JIDB) / The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, (E)2233-5382
2020, v.11 no.12, pp.17-28
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.13106/jidb.2020.vol11.no12.17
CHO, Ik-Jun (Graduate school of Knowledge-Based Technology & Energy, Korea Polytechnic Univ)
KIM, Jin-Kwon (Department of Distribution Management, Jangan University)
YANG, Hoe-Chang (Dept, of Distribution Management, Jangan University)
AHN, Tony-DongHui (Department of Business Management, Korea Polytechnic University)
CHO, Ik-Jun, KIM, Jin-Kwon, YANG, Hoe-Chang, & AHN, Tony-DongHui. (2020). Effects of Smart Factory Quality Characteristics and Dynamic Capabilities on Business Performance: Mediating Effect of Recognition Response. The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business(JIDB), 11(12), 17-28, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.13106/jidb.2020.vol11.no12.17
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수
PDF 다운로드

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to confirm the strategic direction of the firm regarding the capabilities of the organization and its employees in order to increase the utilization and business performance of employees by that introduce smart factories in the domestic manufacturing industry. Research design, data, and methodology: This study derived a structured research model to confirm the mediating effect of recognition responses between the quality characteristics of smart factories and dynamic capabilities. For the analysis, a total of 143 valid questionnaires were used for 200 companies that introduced smart factories from domestic SME's. Results: Quality Characteristics of Smart Factory and Dynamic Capabilities had a statistically significant effect on Usefulness. Recognition Response had a statistically mediating on the relationship between quality characteristics of smart factory and business performance. Recognition Response had a statistically significant effect on business performance. Conclusions: It suggests that firms introducing smart factory reflect them in their empowerment strategic because the recognition responses of its employees differ according to the quality characteristics and dynamic capabilities of smart factories. It also means that the information derived from the smart factory system is useful and effective to business performance and employees.

keywords
Quality Characteristics of Smart Factory, Dynamic Capabilities, Recognition Response, Business Performance

참고문헌

1.

Adamson, I. & Shine, J. (2003). Extending the new Technology acceptance model to measure the end user information system satisfaction in mandatory environment: A bank's Treasury. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 15(4). 441-455.

2.

Ahn, T. U. & Kang, T. W. (2019). The Impacts of Startups Entrepreneurship on Business Performance: Focused on the Mediating Effect of Dynamic Capabilities. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 14(4). 39-49.

3.

Barney, J. B. (2001). Is the resource-based view a useful perspective for strategic management research? yes, Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 41-56.

4.

Butner, K. (2010). The smarter supply chain of the future, Strategy & Leadership, 38(1), 22-31.

5.

Castaneda,J.A. Munoz Levia, F. & Luque ,T.(2007). Web acceptance model: Moderating effects of user experience. Information & Management, 44, 384-396.

6.

Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and Use Acceptance. MIS Quarterly, 75(3), 319-341.

7.

Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., & Warshaw, P.R. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.

8.

Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., & Warshaw, P.R. (1992). Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14), 1111-1132.

9.

DeLone, W.H., & McLean E.R. (1992). Information System Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variables. Information System Research, 3(1), 60-95.

10.

DeLone, W.H., & McLean E.R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A 10-year Update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9-30.

11.

Heo, Y. H & Lee, C. (2012). Determinants of Dynamic Capability and Its Relationships with Competitive Advantage and Performance in Foreign Markets. Journal of International Business Research, 23(1), 33-73

12.

Hopkins, M. S., Lavalle, S. E., Lesser, R., Shockley & N. Kruschwitz. (2011). Big data, analytics and the path from insights to value. MIT Sloan Management Review, 52(2), 21-32.

13.

Jang, K. S & Kim, Y. B.(2010). The Effect of Innovation on Business Performance in Small and Medium Enterprises. Journal of Korea Safety Management & Science, 12(4). 239-246.

14.

Jo, H. S & Yang, S. B. (2011). The study on th effects of system quality of Smart Phone on use of intention. Journal of The Korea Society of Computer and Information. 16(5). 147-152.

15.

Kim, E. H., & Lee, J. J. (1986). An Exploratory Contingency Model of User Participation and MIS Use. Information and Management, 11(2), 87-97.

16.

Kim, H. G. (2019). An Empirical Study on Continuous Use Intention and Switching Intention of the Smart Factory. Journal of the Korea industrial information systems society. 24(2), 65-80.

17.

Kim, J. K., & Ahn, D. H. (2017). Effects of the fitness among Entrepreneurship, Dynamic capabilities and Innovation activities on Business performance. Journal of Digital Convergence. 15(1). 163-170.

18.

Kim, J. S & Cho, W. S. (2015). Data analysis of 4M data in small and medium enterprises. Journal of the Korean Data And Information Science Society, 26(5), 1117-1128.

19.

Kim, S, Y., Yu. Y. J & Lee, S. J. (2014). An Improvement of Organizational Effectiveness through the Analysis of the Relationship between Entrepreneurship and Dynamic Capabilities in IT Venture Business. The Jounal of Society for e-Business Studies, 19(4), 101-117.

20.

Lasi, H., Fettke, P., Feld, T. & M. Hoffman (2015). Industry 4.0, Business and Information Systems Engineering, 6(4), 239-242.

21.

Lee, J. (2015). Smart Factory Systems, Informatik Spectrum, 38(3), 230-235.

22.

Lim, J. W., Jo, D. H., Lee, S. Y., Park, H. J., & Park, J. W. (2017). A Case Study for the Smart Factory Application in the Manufacturing Industry. Korea Journal of Business Administration, 30(9), 1609-1630.

23.

Mario H., Tobias P. & Boris O. (2016). Design Principles for Industrie 4.0 Scenarios, 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences(HICSS).

24.

Morgan, N., Kaleka, A., & Katsikeas, C.(2004), Antecedents of Export Venture Performance: A Theoritical Model and Empirical Assessment, Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 87-108.

25.

Oh, W. G & Kim, I. J. (2018). The Effects of the 4th Industrial Revolution on the Capability of Smart Manufacturing. Society for e-Business Studies, 15(1), 111-118.

26.

Pitt, L. F., Watson, R. T. & Kavan, C. B. (1995). Service Quality:A Measure of Information Systems Effectiveness, MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 173-187.

27.

Porter, M. E. (1996). What is strategy, Harvard Business Review, Nov-Dec. 61-78.

28.

Rai, A., Lang, S. S., & Welker, R.B. (2002). Assessing the Validity of IS Success Models: An Empirical Test and Theoretical Analysis. Information System Research, 13(1), 50-69.

29.

Schillewaert, N., Ahearne, MJ., Frambach, RT. & Moenaert, RK. (2005). The adoption of info rmation technology in the sales force. Industrial Marketing Management, 34, 323-336.

30.

Seddon, P. B. (1997). A Respecification and Extension of DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success. Information System Research, 8(3), 240-253.

31.

Song, S. Y. (2012). Study on the Site Attraction Factors for Online Shopping Mall Business. Journal of the Korean Entrepreneurship Society. 7(4), 105-124.

32.

Szejka, A. L., & O. C. Junior. (2017). The application of reference ontologies for semantic interoperability in an integrated product development process in smart factories. Procedia Manufacturing, 11, 1375-1384.

33.

Teece,D.J., Pisano,G., & Shuen,A.(1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 509-533.

34.

Teece, D. J(2007), Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of sustainable enterprise performance, Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350.

35.

Wang, C. L., & Ahmed, P. K.(2007), Dynamic capabilities: A review and research agenda, International Journal of Management Review, 19(1), 31-51.

36.

Wang, S., J. Wan, D. Li, & C. Zhang. (2016). Implementing Smart Factory of Industrie 4.0: An Outlook. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 4, 1-10.

37.

Wang, J., Y. Ma, L. Zhang, R. X. Gao, & D. Wu. (2018). Deep learning for smart manufacturing: Methods and applications. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 48, 144-156.

38.

Wu, L., X. Yue, A. Jin., & D. C., & Yen. (2016). Smart supply chain management: a review and implications for future research. The International Journal of Logistics Management. 27(2), 395-417.

39.

Zmud, R.W., Boynton, A.C., & Jacobs, G.C, (1987). An Examination of Managerial Strategies for Increasing Information Technology Peneration in Organizations. International Conference on Information Systems. 24-42.

40.

Zahra, S., & Gravis M,(2000). International Corporate Entrepreneurship and Firm Performance: The Moderating Effect of International Environmental Hostilty. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5), 469-492.

41.

Zollo, M. & Winter, S. G,(2002). Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, 13(3), 339-351.

The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business(JIDB)

논문 투고 OA 정책