바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Effect of Real Estate Holding Type on Household Debt

The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business / The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, (E)2233-5382
2021, v.12 no.2, pp.41-52
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.13106/jidb.2021.vol12.no2.41
KIM, Sun-Ju
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to provide implications for the government's housing supply policy by analyzing the factors that determine the type of real estate holding and household debt. This study started from the awareness that the determinants of household debt differ depending on the type of real estate holding. Research design, data and methodology: Real estate ownership type was classified and analyzed into 4 models: model 1 (1 household 1 house and self-resident), model 2 (1 household multiple real estate ownership and self-resident), model 3 (1 household 1 house and rent residence), model 4 (1 household holds a large number of real estate and rent residence). The analysis method used multiple regression analysis. The dependent variable was household total debt. As independent variables, household debt, annual gross household income, financial assets, real estate net assets, annual repayment, demographic & residential characteristics were used. Results: 1) Model 4 has the highest household debt and the highest gross income, Model 2 has the most real estate mortgage loans and real estate net asset, and Model 1 has the highest real estate mortgage payments. 2) The positive factor of common household debt determinants is real estate net assets, and the negative factor is financial assets. 3) It was the net assets of real estate that acted as a positive factor in common for the four models. In other words, the more financial assets, the less household debt. It was analyzed that the more net assets of real estate, the more household debt. The annual repayment of financial liabilities had no influence on household debt, while the annual repayment of loan liabilities and household debt had a positive relationship. Conclusions: 1) It is necessary to introduce benefits and systems that can increase the proportion of household financial asset. Specific alternatives include tax benefits and reduced fees for financial asset investment. 2) In the case where a homeless person prepares one house for one household, it is necessary to prepare various support measures according to the income level. The specific alternative is to give additional points for pre-sale or apply an interest rate cut incentive for mortgage loans.

keywords
Household Debt, Real Estate Mortgage Loans, Real Estate Net Asset, Financial Asset

Reference

1.

Chae, M. J. (2020). Individual Employees’ Service Failures and Customer Satisfaction with the Firm. Journal of Distribution Science, 18(8), 35-45.

2.

Choi, D. R., & Suh, G. H. (2017). A Study on the Effects of Small Business Management Result by the Korean Government:Focus on SEMAS. The Journal of Business Economics and Environmental Studies, 7(3), 33-43.

3.

Danaajoyo, R., Cahaya, F. R., & Riyadh, H. A. (2020). The Prominence of Financial Considerations on Housing Investors’Purchase Decisions. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 7(12), 869-875.

4.

Gunardi, H., Primiana, I., Effendi, N., & Herwany, A. (2020). The Performance of Private Wealth Management in Indonesia. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 7(11), 717-725.

5.

Gwon, J. H. (2015). Formation of Corporate Governance in Korea:The Rise of Chaebols (1910-1980). The Journal of Business Economics and Environmental Studies, 5(4), 67-72.https://doi.org/10.13106/EAJBM.2015.VOL5.NO4.67.

6.

Hala, Y., Abdullah, M. W., Andayani, W., Ilyas, G. B., & Akob, M. (2020). The Financial Behavior of Investment Decision Making Between Real and Financial Assets Sectors. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 7(12), 635–645.

7.

Jeon, J. H. (2018). The Impact of Asian Economic Policy Uncertainty : Evidence from Korean Housing Market. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 5(2), 43–51.

8.

Jeon, J. H. (2019a). Uncertainty and Manufacturing Stock Market in Korea. The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 10(1), 29-37.

9.

Jeon, J. H. (2019b). Dynamic Spillover for the Economic Risk in Korea on Global Uncertainty. Journal of Distribution Science, 17(1), 11-19.

10.

Jeong, D. B. (2017). Forecasting for a Credit Loan from Households in South Korea. The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 8(4), 15-21.

11.

Kim, D. H., & Youn, M. K. (2020). Economic Popularism and Globalization. Journal of Distribution Science, 18(3), 37-41. https://doi.org/10.15722/JDS.18.3.202003.37.

12.

Kim, J. K. (2017). Determinants of Household Debt using a Hierarchical Aging-Period-Cohort Model: Baby-boomers with Middle-Aged & Older Adults. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 17(9), 396-405.

13.

Kim, M. S. (2016): A simple theory of exploding household debts. Munich Personal RePEc Archive, 70849. https://mpra.ub.unimuenchen.de/id/eprint/70849.

14.

Lee, M. (2019). Does Population Aging Contribute to Increased Fiscal Spending? The Journal of Business Economics and Environmental Studies, 9(4), 23-28.

15.

Lee, J. H. (2018). The study on insolvency prediction for Korean households across income levels. Korean Family Resource Management Association, 22(1), 63-78.

16.

Lee, J. H. (2017). Effects of the Great Recession on Debt Repayment Problems of Hispanic Households in the United States. Family and Environment Research, 55(3), 275-287.https://doi.org/10.6115/fer.2017.021.

17.

Lee, S. N. (2016). An Empirical Study on the Influencing factors of Household Debt. Journal of Digital Convergence, 14(5), 177-183.

18.

Oh, M. S., & Hyun, S. M. (2009). Analysis of Stress level of Korean Household Members due to Household Debt. The Korean Journal of Applied Statistics, 22(2), 297-307.

19.

Park, H. K., & Jeong, D. B. (2018). A Study on Determinants of Asset Price: Focused on USA. The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 9(5), 63-72.

20.

Park, Y. T., & Rho, J. H. (2017). A Study on Determinants of Subjective Repayment Burden in Household Debt by Income Quintile Groups. The Korea Contents Association, 17(9), 145-158.

21.

The Institute of International Finance. (2020). Financing a Sustainable Future for Emerging Markets. October 12, 2020. https://www.iif.com/Publications/Members-Only-ContentSign-in?returnurl=/publications/id/4129.

22.

Tran, S. H., & Nguyen, L. T. (2020). Financial Development, Business Cycle and Bank Risk in Southeast Asian Countries. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 7(3), 127-135. https://doi.org/10.13106/JAFEB.2020.VOL7.NO3.127

23.

Yoo, B. K. & Kim, S. H. (2020). Formation of Employment Subcenters and Regional Industry Restructuring: Focusing Wholesale and Retail Sector in Incheon. Journal of Distribution Science, 18(2), 59-67.

24.

Wijaya, A., Ilmi, Z., & Darma, D. (2020). Economic Performance:Leading Sector, Economic Structure and Competitiveness of Export Commodities. The Journal of Business Economics and Environmental Studies, 10(3), 23-33.https://doi.org/10.13106/JBEES.2020.VOL10.NO3.23.

The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business