바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • E-ISSN2233-5382
  • KCI

The Effect of Business Strategy on Stock Price Crash Risk

The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business / The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, (E)2233-5382
2021, v.12 no.3, pp.43-49
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.13106/jidb.2021.vol12.no3.43
RYU, Haeyoung

Abstract

Purpose: This study attempted to examine the risk of stock price plunge according to the firm's management strategy. Prospector firms value innovation and have high uncertainties due to rapid growth. There is a possibility of lowering the quality of financial reporting in order to meet market expectations while withstanding the uncertainty of the results. In addition, managers of prospector firms enter into compensation contracts based on stock prices, thus creating an incentive to withhold negative information disclosure to the market. Prospector firms' information opacity and delays in disclosure of negative information are likely to cause a sharp decline in share prices in the future. Research design, data and methodology: This study performed logistic analysis of KOSPI listed firms from 2014 to 2017. The independent variable is the strategic index, and is calculated by considering the six characteristics (R&D investment, efficiency, growth potential, marketing, organizational stability, capital intensity) of the firm. The higher the total score, the more it is a firm that takes a prospector strategy, and the lower the total score, the more it is a firm that pursues a defender strategy. In the case of the dependent variable, a value of 1 was assigned when there was a week that experienced a sharp decline in stock prices, and 0 when it was not. Results: It was found that the more firms adopting the prospector strategy, the higher the risk of a sharp decline in the stock price. This is interpreted as the reason that firms pursuing a prospector strategy do not disclose negative information by being conscious of market investors while carrying out venture projects. In other words, compensation contracts based on uncertainty in the outcome of prospector firms and stock prices increase the opacity of information and are likely to cause a sharp decline in share prices. Conclusions: This study's analysis of the impact of management strategy on the stock price plunge suggests that investors need to consider the strategy that firms take in allocating resources. Firms need to be cautious in examining the impact of a particular strategy on the capital markets and implementing that strategy.

keywords
Business Strategy, Prospector Firm, Information Opacity, Stock Price Crash Risk

Reference

1.

Bartov, E., & Mohanram, P. (2004). Private Information, Earnings Manipulations, and Executive Stock Option Exercises. The Accounting Review, 79(4), 889-920.

2.

Bentley, K. A., Omer, T. C., & Sharp, N. Y. (2013). Business Strategy, Audit Fees and Financial Reporting Irregularities. Contemporary Accounting Research, 30(2), 780-817.

3.

Burn, N., & Kedia, S. (2006). The Impact of Performance-based Compensation on Misreporting. Journal of Financial Economics, 79(1), 35-67.

4.

Cheng, Q., & Warfield, T. D. (2005). Equity Incentives and Earnings Management. The Accounting Review, 80(2), 441-476.

5.

Dyreng, S. D., Hanlon, M., & Maydew, E. L. (2010). The Effects of Executives on Corporate Tax Avoidance. The Accounting Review, 85(4), 1163-1189.

6.

Efendi. J., Srivastava, A., & Swanson, E. P. (2007). Why Do Corporate Managers Misstate Financial Statements? The Role of Option Compensation and Other Factors. Journal of Financial Economics, 85(3), 667-708.

7.

Francis, B., Hasan, I., & Li, L. (2016). Abnormal Real Operations, Real Earnings Management, and Subsequent Crashes in Stock Prices. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 46(2), 217-260.

8.

Higgins, D., Omer, T. C., & Phillips, J. D. (2015). The Influence of a Firm’s Business Strategy on its Tax Aggressiveness. Contemporary Accounting Research, 32(2), 674-702.

9.

Hutton. A. P., Marcus, A. J., & Tehranian, H. (2009). Opaque Financial Reports, R2, and Crash Risk. Journal of Financial Economics, 94, 67-86.

10.

Ittner, C. D., Larcker, D. F., & Rajan, M. V. (1997). The Choice of Performance Measures in Annual Bonus Contracts. The Accounting Review, 72(2), 231-255.

11.

Jin. L., & Myers, S. C. (2006). R2 around the World: New Theory and New Tests. Journal of Financial Economics, 79, 257-292.

12.

Kim, J. B., Li, Y., & Zhang, L. (2011). Corporate Tax Avoidance and Stock Price Crash Risk: Firm-level Analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 100(3), 639-662.

13.

Miles, R. E., & Snow, C. C. (2003). Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

14.

Nair, A., & Kotha, S. (2001). Does Group Membership Matter? Evidence from the Japanese Steel Industry. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 221-235.

15.

McNamara, G. M., Luce, R. A., & Thompson, G. H. (2002). Examining the Effect of Complexity in Strategic Group Knowledge Structures on Firm Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23(2), 153-170.

16.

Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive Strategy. New York: Free Press.

17.

Rajagopalan, N. (1997). Strategic Orientations, Incentive Plan Adoptions, and Firm Performance: Evidence from Electric Utility Firms. Strategic Management Journal, 18(10), 761-785.

18.

Singh, P., & Agarwal, N. C. (2002). The Effects of Firm Strategy on the Level and Structure of Executive Compensation. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 19(1), 42-56.

The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business