.png){kind=logo}
ISSN : 1229-8778
This study investigated the effects of constructive processes and need for cognition on preference reversals in judgment and choice tasks. The experimental design was 2(degree of constructive processes: low/high) × 2(need for cognition: low/high) completely randomized factorial design. The results showed that first, in the familiar product, subjects in high constructive processes condition had higher rate in preference reversals in response mode than in low constructive processes condition. Second, in the familiar product, subjects who had high need for cognition did not show significant difference in preference reversals in response mode between low and high level of constructive processes. Third, in the familiar product, subjects who had low need for cognition showed significant difference in preference reversals in response mode between low and high level of constructive processes. However, in the unfamiliar product, all of the points mentioned above were not significant. In addition, subjects in high constructive processes condition showed significant difference in consideration of attribute importance in response mode. Also, when preference reversals happened, difference in consideration of attribute importance in response mode is significant.
김완석 (1994). 한국형 인지욕구척도 개발연구. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 7(1), 87- 101.
양윤 (1998). 소비자는 제품정보를 평균내는가? 가산하는가?: 가중치 교환과정을 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 산업및조직, 11(2), 71-83.
양윤 (2003). 인지욕구와 자기감시가 제품속성에 대한 반응시간에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 소비자․광고, 4(1), 25-40.
양윤, 윤선영 (2005). 상표명, 사전지식, 반응양식이 소비자 정보회상에 미치는 영향. 광고연구, 67호 85-108.
이유재, 김병규 (2004). 아는 것이 힘? 사전 지식이 평가모드에 따른 선호역전에 미치는 영향에 대한 연구. 경영학 연구, 33(1), 51-71.
Baile, J. R., & Billings, R. S. (1994). Sequential Phase of Judgment and the Value Representation of Product Alternatives. Advances in Consumer Research, 21, 437-441.
Bazerman, M. H., Loewenstein, G. F., & White, S. B. (1992). Reversals of Preference in Allocation Decision: Judging an Alternative versus Choosing among Alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 220-240.
Bettman, J. R., Luce, M. F., & Payne, J. W. (1998). Constructive consumer choice processes. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 187-217.
Bettman, J. R., & Zins, M. A. (1977). Constructive process in consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 4, 75-85.
Billings, R. S., & Scherer, L. L. (1988). The Effects of Response Mode and Importance on Decision-Making Strategies: Judgment versus Choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 41, 3-29.
Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116-131.
Coupey, E., Irwin J. R., & Payne, J. W. (1998). Product category familiarity and preference construction. Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 459-468.
Einhorn, H. J., & Hogarth, R. M. (1981). Behavioral Decision Theory: Processes of Judgment and Choice. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 53-88.
Fedorikhin, A., & Cole, C. (2004). Mood effects on Attitudes, perceived risk and choice : Moderators and Mediators. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(1&2), 2-12.
Fischer. G. W., & Hawkins, S. A. (1993). Strategy compatibility, scale compatibility, and the prominence effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 580-597.
Goldstein, W. M., & Einhorn, H. J. (1987). Expression Theory and the Preference Reversal Phenomenal. Psychological Review, 94. 236-254.
Haugtvedt, C. P., Petty R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1992). Need for cognition and advertising: Understanding the role of personality variables in consumer behavior. Journal of consumer Psychology, 1(3), 239-260.
Haugtvedt, C. P., Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Steidley, T. (1988). Personality and ad effectiveness: Exploring the utility of need for cognition. Advances in Consumer Research, 15, 209-212.
Hsee, C. K. (1996). The Evaluability Hypothesis: An Explanation for Preference reversals between Joint and Separate Evaluations of Alternatives. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67(3), 247-257.
Inman, J. J., McAlister, L., & Hoyer, W. D. (1990). Promotion signal: Proxy for a price cut? Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 74-81.
Jacoby, J., Szybillo, G. J., & Busato-Schach, J. (1977). Information acquisition behavior in brand choice situations. Journal of Consumer Research, 3, 209-216.
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L. & Thaler, R. H. (1990). Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase theorem. Journal of political Economy, 98, 1325-1348.
Kahneman, D., & Miller, D. T. (1986). Norm Theory: Comparing Reality to Its Alternatives. Psychological Review, 93, 136- 153.
Lichtenstein, S., & Slovic, P. (1971). Reversal of Preference Between Bids and Choices in Gambling Decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89, 46-55.
Nowlis, M. S., & Simonson, I. (1997). Attribute- Task Compatibility as a Determinant of Consumer Preference Reversals. Journal of Consumer Research, 205-218.
Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1992). Behavioral decision research: A constructive processing perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 87-131.
Ritov, I., & Kahneman, D. (1997). How People value the environment? Environment, Ethics, and Behavior, New Lexington Press, San Francisco, CA.
Schkade, D. A., & Johnson, E. J. (1989). Cognitive Processes in Preference Reversal. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 44, 203-231.
Senter, S. M., & Wedell, D. H. (1999). Information Presentation constraints and the adaptive decision maker hypothesis. Journal of experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 25(2), 426-446.
Shafir, E. (1993). Choosing versus rejecting: Why some options are both better and worse than others. Memory & Cognition, 21, 546-556.
Sood, S., & Forehand, M. (2005). On self- referencing differences in judgment and choice. Organizational Behavior and human Decision Process, 98, 144-154.
Troutman, C. M., & Shanteau, J. (1976). Do consumers evaluate products by adding or averaging attribute information? Journal of Consumer Research, 3, 101-106.
Tversky, A., & Griffin, D. (1991). Endowment and contrasts in judgments of well-being. An interdisciplinary perspective(21). Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decision. Journal of Business, 59, 251-278.
Tversky, A., Sattath, S., & Slovic, P. (1988). Contingent Weighting in Judgment and Choice. Psychological Review, 95, 371-384.
Wedell, D. H., & Senter, S. M. (1997). Looking and Weighting in judgment and choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 70(1), 41-64.
Westenberg, M. R. M., & Koele, P. (1992). Response Modes, Decision Processes and Decision Outcomes. Acta Psychologica, 80, 169-184.
Zhang, J., Hsee, C. K., & Xiao, Z. (2006). The majority rule in individual decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 99, 102-111.