- P-ISSN 1225-0163
- E-ISSN 2288-8985
- P-ISSN1225-0163
- E-ISSN2288-8985
- SCOPUS, ESCI, KCI
Article Detail
Home > Article Detail
The application of a chemical assessment of archaeological animal bone by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and x-ray diffraction
Analytical Science and Technology / Analytical Science and Technology, (P)1225-0163; (E)2288-8985
2014, v.27 no.6, pp.300-307
https://doi.org/10.5806/AST.2014.27.5.300
&
(2014). The application of a chemical assessment of archaeological animal bone by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and x-ray diffraction. Analytical Science and Technology, 27(6), 300-307, https://doi.org/10.5806/AST.2014.27.5.300
- Downloaded
- Viewed
Abstract
For the application of chemical assessment standards by the extent of diagenetic alteration, weinvestigated three archaeological animal bones and a modern animal bone using Fourier transform infraredattenuatedtotal reflection (FTIR-ATR) spectroscopy and x-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis. The calculating resultsof crystallinity index (CI), carbonate-to-phosphate (C/P) and carbonate-to-carbonate (C/C) using FTIR-ATRspectra showed differences CI and C/P according to the preservative condition of animal bones. By comparisonof the crystallinity contents using XRD patterns, the states of animal bones were distinguished to the rangeof 30°-35°. As results of FTIR-ATR and XRD analysis, it is suggested that Mongolian large mammals bonepresents the best preservative condition, and cattle bone from Naju site, and Haman site followed. In addition,those were correlated with the results of histological index. The results suggested that the chemical assessmentstandards may contribute to application of predictions of the states of animal bones discovered from Korea.
- keywords
- diagenesis, hydroxyapatite, crystallinity index, C/P, C/C
Reference
1
1. R. E. M. Hedges, A. R. Millard and A. W. G. Pike, J. Archaeol. Sci., 22(2), 201-209 (1995).
2
2. C. L. King, N. Tayles and K. C. Gordon, J. Archaeol. Sci., 38(9), 2222-2230 (2011).
3
3. T. Tütken and T. W. Vennemann, Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol., 310(1-2), 1-8 (2011).
4
4. L. L. Tieszen, T. W. Boutton, K. G. Tesdahl and N. A. Slade, Oecologia, 57, 32-37 (1983).
5
5. R. A. Bentley, J. Archaeol. Method Theory, 13(3), 135-187 (2006).
6
6. R. E. M. Hedges and L. M. Reynord, J. Archaeol. Sci., 34(8), 1240-1251 (2007).
7
7. S. Pääbo, H. Poinar, D. Serre, V. Jaenicke-Després, J. Hebler, N. Rohland, M. Kuch, J. Krause, L. Vigilant and M. Hofreiter, Annu. Rev. Genet., 38, 645-679 (2004).
8
8. T. J. U. Thompson, M. Gauthier and M. Islam, J. Archaeol. Sci., 36(3), 910-914 (2009).
9
9. A. P. Lee, J. Klinowski and E. A. Marseglia, J. Archaeol. Sci., 22(2), 257-262 (1995).
10
10. M. M. E. Jans, C. M. Nieslen-Marsh, C. I. Smith, M. J. Collins and H. Kars, J. Archaeol. Sci., 31(1), 87-95(2004).
11
11. C. N. G. Trueman, A. K. Behrensmeyer, N. Tuross and S. Weiner, J. Archaeol. Sci., 31(6), 721-739 (2004).
12
12. C. N. Trueman, K. Privat and J. Field. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol., 266(3-4), 160-167 (2008).
13
13. S. Weiner and O, Bar-Yosef, J. Archaeol. Sci., 17(2), 187-196 (1990).
14
14. S. J. Garvie-Lok, T. L. Varney and M. A. Katzenberg, J. Archaeol. Sci., 31(6), 763-776 (2004).
15
15. C. M. Nielsen-Marsh and R. E. M. Hedges, J. Archaeol. Sci., 27(12), 1151-1159 (2000).
16
16. K. Belbachir, R. Noreen, G. Gouslillou and C. Petibois. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 395, 829-837 (2009).
17
17. J. H. Muyonga, C. G. B. Cole and K. G. Doudu. Food Chem. 86, 325-332 (2004).
18
18. J. D. Fredericks, P. Bennett, A. Williams and K. D. Rogers, Forensic Sci. Int. 6(3) 375-380 (2012).
19
19. E. T. Stathopoulou, V. Psycharis, G. D. Chryssikos, V. Gionis and G. Theodorou, Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol., 266(3-4), 168-174 (2008).
20
20. H. I. Hollund, F. Ariese, R. Fernandes, M. M. E. Jans and H. Kars, Archaeometry, 55(3), 507-532 (2013).
21
21. M. M. Beasley, E. J. Bartelink, L. Taylor and R. M. Miller, J. Archaeol. Sci., 46, 16-22 (2014).
22
22. S. H. Jee, J. H. Park, M. S. Seo, J. W. Hong and Y. J. Chung. Conservation Study 28, 75-90 (2007).
23
23. S. Kang, E. S. Kwon, E. J. Moon, E. M Cho, M. S. Seo, Y. J. Kim and S. H, Jee. J. Conservation Sci., 26(1), 95-107 (2010).
24
24. D. Y. Kang and J. Y. Shin. Analytical Sci. Technology 25(5), 300-306 (2012).
25
25. J. Y. Shin, D. Y. Kang, S. H. Kim and E. D. Jung. Analytical Sci. Technology 26(6), 387-394 (2013).
26
26. E. M Cho, S. Kang, E. S. Kwon and S. H. Jee. Conservation Study 31, 69-77 (2010).
27
27. E. S. Kwon, E. M Cho, S. H. Kim and S. Kang. Conservation Study 32, 171-183 (2011).
28
28. 4th excavation report of Seongsan mountain fortress, Haman, Gaya National Research Institute of Cultural Heritage, p55, 2011.
29
29. 4th-6th excavation report of Bokam-ri site, Naju, Naju National Research Institute of Cultural Heritage, p124-135, 2013.
30
30. T. J. U. Thompson, M. Islam and M. Bonniere, J. Archaeol. Sci., 40(1), 416-422 (2013).
31
31. M. C. Stiner, S. L. Kuhn, S. Weiner and O, Bar-Yosef, J. Archaeol. Sci., 22(2), 223-237 (1995).
32
32. T. A. Surovell and M. C. Stiner, J. Archaeol. Sci., 28(6), 633-642 (2001).
33
33. L. E. Wright and H. P. Schwarcz, J. Archaeol. Sci., 23(6), 933-944 (1996).
34
34. T. J. U. Thompson, M. Islam, K. Piduru and A. Marcel, Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol., 299, 168-174 (2011).
35
35. G. Piga, A. Malgosa, T. J. U. Thompson and S. Enzo, J. Archaeol. Sci., 35, 2171-2178 (2008).
36
36. G. Piga, G. Solinas, T. J. U. Thompson, A. Brunetti and A. Malgosa, J. Archaeol. Sci., 40, 778-785 (2013).
37
37. A. Sillen, In ‘The chemistry of prehistoric human bone’, p.211-229, T. Douglas Price, Ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1989.
38
38. N. Tuross, A. K. Behrensmeyer and E. D. Eanes, J. Archaeol. Sci., 16, 661-672 (1989).
39
39. A. Bartsiokas and A. P. Middleton, J. Archaeol. Sci., 19, 63-72 (1992).
Other articles from this issue
- A short study of uncertainty for post column isotope dilution method in HPLC-ICP/MS
- Effect of concentration, pressure, and cut-off size on removing phospholipase A2 in bee venom by ultrafiltration
- VOCs impact factor analysis of unit components in Part assembly by ISO 12219-5 method
- Structural characterization and degradation efficiency of degradation products of iopromide by electron beam irradiation
- The application of a chemical assessment of archaeological animal bone by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and x-ray diffraction
- The characteristics of dye-sensitized solar cells using carbon nanotube in working and counter electrodes
- Microwave-modified sol-gel preparation of La2(MoO4)3:Er3+/Yb3 particles and their upconversion photoluminescence properties
- Distribution characteristics of hexabromocyclododecanes in crucian carp and sediment from the major rivers
- Validation of analysis of urinary fluoride by ion selective electrode method
- Validation of urinary N-methylacetamide reference material for proficiency test
- PCDDs and DFs concentrations from the fly ash and bottom ash of industrial waste incinerators in Korean
- Determination of boron in steel by HNO3-NH4HF2 digestion and ICP-MS
- Preparation and characterization of the primary gas standards for isoprene
- more
Recommanded Articles
This website recommended the use the Chrome browser for journal website.