- E-ISSN2288-2766
- KCI
E-ISSN : 2288-2766
Comparative Study of Korean and Chinese University Students’ Economics and Business Literacy
Abstract
Purpose – This study attempts a multifaceted analysis utilizing the Chinese test takers’ results of the Economy & Business Aptitude Test. Since Chinese students study socialist theories of economics along with market-based ones, comparing Chinese university students’ basic knowledge of economics and business and its application to those of Korean test takers is also very meaningful from the perspective of economics education research. Research design, data, and methodology – This study investigates the results on the test of economy and business understanding between Korea and China. For comparison of the result, we conducted MK-TEST for two universities in China. Result – This study finds that the average correct answer rate of Korea is higher than one of China according to the overall results. The average difference rate is about 15% between Korea and China. More concretely, the correct answer rate of business area is higher than one of economy area, identifying them by subject area. Conclusion – According to the results, this study can infer that there are no or little differences in the ability of examinee to solve applied questions between Korea and China and the differences of the scope and emphasis point in an academic curriculum between both countries might bring these kinds of results. Finally, Chinese students shows higher correct answer rate to the questions about the economy issues and policies related to China than one of Korea examinee.
- keywords
- Comparison of Korean and Chinese Economics and Business Literacy, University Students’ Economics, Business Literacy
Reference
Kim, S. K. (2008). International Comparison of University Students' Knowledge of Economics: Korea, the United States and Japan. Korean Journal of Economic Education, 15(2), 33-61
Park, M. L. (2002). The Results of Test of Economic Literacy of High School Students. Korean Journal of Economic Education, 9(1), 33-61
Oh, Y. S., & Park, S. E. (2012). A Comparative Analysis between Korea and U.S. High School Students' Economic Literacy. Korean Journal of Economic Education, 19(2), 139-162
Chen, H., & Volpe, R. P. (1998). An Analysis of Personal Financial Literacy among College Students, Financial Services Review, 7(2), 107-128.
Franziska, R., & Roland, H. (2021). A Multilevel Analysis of Economic Literacy Among International Students. Journal of International Students, 11(3), 706–722.
Hahn, J., & Jang, K. (2012). The Effects of a Translation Bias on the Scores for the Basic Economics Test. Korean Journal of Economic Education, 43(2), 133-148.
Jang K., Hahn, K., & Kim, K. (2010). Comparative Korean Results of TUCE with U.S. and Japan. Comparative Studies on Economic Education in Asia-Pacific Region, Japan: Shumpusha Publishing, 53-77.
Kim, K., & K. Jang. (2013). International Comparison of the Economic Knowledge form the Result of the Test of Economic Knowledge in Korea. Korean Journal of Economic Education, 20(2), 109-133.
OECD (2012a). Economics Assessment Framework. Assessment of Higher Education Learning Outcomes. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/education/skills-beyond-school/AHELOFSReportVolume1.pdf
Tovazzi, S., & Giovannini, D. (2020). Method for Evaluating Knowledge, Beliefs, and Neuromyths about the Mind and Brain among Ialian Tachers. Mind, Brain, and Education, 14 (2), 187-198
Walstad, W. B., & Sam, A. (1999). What Do College Seniors Know about Economics?. The American Economic Review, 89(2), 350–354.
Walstad, W. B. (2013). Economic Understanding in U.S. High School Courses. American Economic Review, 1023 (3), 659–63.
Yin, X., Cui. Y., & Lin, C. (2013). A Comparative Study on the Understanding of College Macroeconomics between China and Japan. Korean Journal of Economic Education, 20(2), 135-156.
- Downloaded
- Viewed
- 0KCI Citations
- 0WOS Citations
