바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Study on the Improvement of Paying Taxes in China proposed by the Analysis of Paying Taxest in Korea and Japan

East Asian Journal of Business Economics / East Asian Journal of Business Economics, (E)2288-2766
2021, v.9 no.3, pp.29-43
https://doi.org/10.20498/eajbe.2021.9.3.29
Dai-Jia LIN (Guangdong Innovative Technical College)
Hyung-Ho Kim

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this study is to analyze the root causes of changes in the rankings of Paying Taxes in Japan and Korea from 2019 to 2020, and put forward relevant policy recommendations for China from the perspective of enterprise tax burden and tax compliance costs. Research design, data, and methodology – This paper analyzes the data information of four indicators of Japan and Korea in Paying Taxes from 2009 to 2019, excel tool was used to summarize the essential reasons for the changes. Result – The results showed that, through the reform of tax system, especially the application of electronic tax system for tax declaration, and this is the fundamental reason why Korea has surpassed Japan in the ranking of Paying Taxes in recent five years. Conclusion – Drawing lessons from the reforms in South Korea and Japan, it is concluded that China should improve its tax ranking through two ways.First, deepen the reform of the main tax and fee system and reduce the burden of enterprise taxes and fees.Second, further simplify the tax procedures. Return rights and responsibilities to the enterprise.

keywords
Paying Taxes, Tax environment, Optimization approach, Comparative analysis

Reference

1.

Adrian, C., & Robert, G. (2015). Foreign direct investment and the ease of doing business. Review of World Economics, 151(1), 103-126.

2.

Bao, J. T., Xiao, T. S., & Hong, C. (2018). A study on overseas oil and gas investment to avoid the risk of the changes in tax policies a case in China. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 160(1), 35-46.

3.

Cai, H., & Liu, Q. (2018). Competition and corporate tax avoidance: Evidence from chinese industrial firm. Economic Journal, 119(537), 764-795.

4.

Doing Business Report (2009-2019), World Bank.

5.

Greenblatt, R. E. (2017). Oscillatory dynamics of investment and capacity utilization. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 465(1), 486-493.

6.

Gebremariam, S. N., & Marchetti, J. M. (2018). Economics of biodiesel production: Review. Energy Conversion and Management, 168(1), 74-84.

7.

Jung, D. J., Nam, H. J., Park, S. W., & Lee, Y. A. (2020). Does accrual basis corporate income tax better-predict future national corporate tax revenue? Korean Governmental Accounting Review, 18(1), 39-55.

8.

Kim, J. Y. (2019) Analysis of differentiation of policy strategies for digital taxation. Journal of Digital Convergence, 17(12), 45-57.

9.

Luo, Q. (2017). Comparison and reference of international experience in tax business environment. Tax Studies, 349(5), 30-35.

10.

Lin, M. L., & Yang, X. (2018). Optimizing china’s tax business environment. Dong Yue Tribune, 39(12), 124-131.

11.

Lee, B. S. (2015). Tax incentives for job creation and employment retention. Journal of Digital Convergence, 13(11), 133-139.

12.

Luo, Y. F. (2017). Research on the role of taxation in optimizing the business environment. Journal of Hunan Taxation College, 31(5), 27-35.

13.

Paying Taxes Report (2009-2019), World Bank. & PwC

14.

Qin, L. (2017). Comparison and reference of international experience in tax business environment. Tax Studies, 19(2), 62-66.

15.

Seo, B. W., & Moon, S. K. (2014). A study on the effectiveness and policy improvement of tax-aid systems for venture business and small & medium firms. Journal of Digital Convergence, 12(2), 173-182.

16.

Siali, M., Flazi, S., Boudghene Stambouli, A., & Fergani, S. (2016). Optimization of the investment cost of solar based grid. Renewable Energy, 97(1), 169-176.

East Asian Journal of Business Economics