- 권한신청
- E-ISSN2233-5382
- KCI
Cost Stickiness and Investment Efficiency
Cost Stickiness and Investment Efficiency
- 다운로드 수
- 조회수
Abstract
Purpose: This study predicted cost asymmetry as a determinant of investment efficiency, and empirically analyzed the relationship between cost stickiness and investment efficiency. Research design, data and methodology: Using a sample of 4,382 Korean firm-year observations over 2011-2017 period, I examined the relationship between cost stickiness and investment efficiency. Asymmetrical cost behavior is measured as model of Homburg and Nasev (2008) and model of Park, Koo, and Pae (2012). Investment efficiency is measured as Chen, Hope, Li, and Wang (2011)'s model. Results: Firms with cost stickiness are less efficient in their investment than firms with non-cost stickiness. In other words, cost stickiness is an empirical result that supports the previous research on cost decision-making from perspective of managers pursuing private benefits due to information asymmetry. Conclusions: By showing that the manager's decision-making on the cost behavior affects the investment efficiency corresponding to capital management, the implications for the mechanism for efficient capital management are provided. Through the empirical results, it was shown that the cost stickiness is a product of opportunistic cost decision-making due to information asymmetry, and it is to present evidence that expands the meaning of the causes of asymmetric cost behavior.
- keywords
- Cost Stickiness, Asymmetry Cost Behavior, Investment Efficiency, Overinvestment, Underinvestment
참고문헌
Ali, M., & Asri, M. (2019). Prospect theory: Overcome risk disaster in emerging market. Earth and Environmental Science, 235(1) 012010, 1-15. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/235/1/012010
Anderson, M. C., Banker, R. D., & Janakiraman, S. N. (2003). Are Selling, General, and Administrative Costs ‘Sticky’? Journal of Accounting Research, 41(1), 47-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.00095
Anderson, M., Banker, R., Huang, R., & Janakiraman, S. (2007). Cost Behavior and Fundamental Analysis of SG&A Costs. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 41(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558x0702200103
Ban, H. J. (2011). Accounting Quality and Investment Efficiency by Corporate Governance Structures. Korean Journal of Business Administration, 24(5), 3079-3096.
Banker, R.D., D. Byzalov, & L. Chen. (2013). Employment protection legislation, adjustment costs and cross-country differences in cost behavior. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 55(1), 111-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2012.08.003
Banker, R. D., & Byzalov, D. (2014). Asymmetric Cost Behavior. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 26(2), 43-79. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-50846
Biddle, G., & Hilary, G. (2006). Accounting Quality and Firm Level Capital Investment. The Accounting Review, 81(5), 963-982. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2006.81.5.963
Biddle G., G. Hilary, & S. Verdi. (2009). How does Financial Reporting Quality relate to Investment Efficiency. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 48(2-3), 112-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2009.09.001
Bushman, R.M., & Smith, A.J. (2001). Financial Accounting Information and Corporate Governance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32(1-3), 237-333. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00027-1
Chen, F., Hope, O.K., Li, Q., & Wang, X. (2011). Financial Reporting Quality and Investment Efficiency of Private Firms in Emerging Markets. The Accounting Review, 86(5), 1255-1288. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-10040
Cheung J. H., Jang, J. I., & Yang, D. C. (2013). Agency Problem and Asymmetric Cost Behavior (Focusing on Tax Investigation and Audit Review). Korean Accounting Review, 38(1), 321-354.
Cho, M. K., Kim, J. J., Gong, K. T., & Jeong, H. S. (2014). The Effect of Audit Quality on the Asymmetric Cost Behavior. Business Education Research, 28(3), 361-378.
Cho, S. M., & Kang, S .A. (2016). The Effect of Industry Competition Intensity on Capital Investment Efficiency. Korea Business Education Research, 31(2), 23-43.
Ciftci, M., & Salama, F. M. (2018). Stickiness in Costs and Voluntary Disclosures: Evidence from Management Earnings Forecasts. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 30(3), 211-234.
Dichev, I. D., Graham, J., Harvey, C. R., & Rajgopal, S. (2013). Earnings Quality: Evidence from the Field. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 56(2-3), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2013.05.004
Gomariz, M. F. C., & Bellesta, J. P. S. (2014). Financial Reporting Quality, Debt Maturity and Investment Efficiency. Journal of Bank and Finance, 40, 494-506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.07.013
Hirshleifer, D., Hou, K., Teoh, S., & Zhang, Y. (2004). Do Investors Overvalue Firms With Bloated Balance Sheets? Journal of Accounting and Economic, 38, 297-331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2004.10.002
Holzhacker, M., R. Krishnan, & M. D. Mahlendorf. (2015a). The impact of changes in regulation on cost behavior. Contemporary Accounting Research, 32(2), 534-566. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12082
Holzhacker, M., R. Krishnan, & M. D. Mahlendorf. (2015b). Unraveling the black box of cost behavior: An empirical investigation of risk drivers, managerial resource procurement, and cost elasticity. The Accounting Review, 90(6), 2305-2335. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51092
Homburg, C & J. Nasev. (2008). How Timely are Earnings when Costs are Sticky? Implication for Link between Conditional Conservatism and Cost Stickiness. AAA 2009 Management Accounting Section (MAS) Meeting Paper. 1-35. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1187082
Kama, I., & Weiss, D. (2013). Do Earnings Targets and Managerial Incentives Affect Sticky Costs? Journal of Accounting Research, 51(1), 201-224. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475- 679X.2012.00471.x
Kim, H. J. (2015). Internal Control over Financial Reporting and Investment Efficiency. Korean International Accounting Review, 62, 1-26.
Kim S. R. N., & Yang, D. H. (2012). The Impact of the Asymmetric Cost Behavior on Accounting Conservatism. Taxation and Accounting Journal, 13(2), 197-227.
Kim, S. R. N., & Ryu, H. Y. (2014). Managerial Overconfidence and Cost Stickiness. Korean Accounting Journal, 23(6), 309-345.
Koo, J. H. (2011). The Effect of Earnings Management Incentives on the Asymmetric Cost Behavior: Focus on Loss Avoiding, Income Smoothing and Big-Bath. Korean Accounting Review, 36(3), 135-177.
Lambert, R., C. Leuz, & R. Verrecchia. (2007). Accounting information, disclosure, and the cost of capital. Journal of Accounting Research 45(2), 385-420. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2007.00238.x
Lee, B. M., & Paek, W. S. (2015). Investment Efficiency, Earnings Persistence, and Value Relevance. Korean Management Review, 44(5), 1277-1304.
Lee, J. I., & Shin, M. S. (2018). The Effects of Financial Reporting Quality and Debt Maturity on Corporate Investment Efficiency. Research for Finance and Knowledge, 16(2), 3-41. https://doi:10.38200/JFKS.16.2.1
Lee, S. Y. (2012). Cost Behavior and Firm Valuation. Journal of Finance and Accounting Information, 12(3), 93-112.
McNichols, M. F., & Stubben, S. R. (2008). Does earnings management affect firms’ investment decisions? The Accounting Review, 83(6), 1571-1603. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2008.83.6.1571
Oh, H. M. & Bae, H. J. (2021). Effect of Cost Stickiness on Dividend Policy. Korean International Accounting Review, 97, 55-80.
Park, J. H. & Sonu, H. J. (2016). Management Forecast and Asymmetric Cost Behavior. Accounting Information Research, 34(3), 189-213.
Park, S. J., & Shin, H. Y. (2019). The Effects of Earnings Persistence on Corporate Investment Efficiency. Global Business Administration Review, 16(3), 161-183.
Park, Y. H., Koo, J. H., & Pae, S. I. (2012). The Information Effect of Cost Stickiness in Korea Market. Korean Accounting Review, 37(43), 227-252.
Sadalia, I., Rahamani, N. A. B., & Muda, I. (2017). The significance of internet based financial information disclosure on corporates' shares in indonesia. International Journal of Economic Research, 14(12), 337-346.
Shin, H. Y., & Oh, H. M. (2017). Earnings Transparency and Investments Efficiency. Global Business Administration Review, 14(4), 19-36
- 다운로드 수
- 조회수
- 0KCI 피인용수
- 0WOS 피인용수