.png){kind=logo}
ISSN : 1229-8778
According to the interest of consumers and companies for altruistic consumption increased, the study on the comparison between the traditional discount promotion and discount with donation promotion has been done. The purpose of this study to examine the effects of the consumer’s altruism and product type, discounts promotion on product attitude and purchasing intention. To achieve this goal, the experiment was designed by 2 types of consumer’s altruism(high / low) * 2 types of products type(practical product / hedonic product) * 2 type of discounts promotion(only discount/ discount with donation) factors. The total of 165 undergraduate students were recruited and asked to answered questions. The results of this study were as follow. First, The effect of the consumer’s altruism and product type, discount promotion on purchasing intention were significant. For the high group of altruism, purchasing intention was high at discount with donation promotion than only discount promotion in practical product. And purchasing intention was high at discount with donation promotion than only discount promotion in hedonic product. For the low group of altruism, purchasing intention was high at discount promotion than discount with donation promotion in practical product. But, purchasing intention was high at discount with donation promotion than discount promotion in hedonic product. Second, The effect of the consumer’s altruism and product type, discount promotion on product attitude were not significant. The results suggest that consumer that have high altruism will high probability of purchasing product at discount with donation promotion regardless of product type. But, consumer that have low altruism will altruistic consumption behavior differently on product types.
강철희, 고언정, 정혜영 (2009). 기부노력에 대한 기부동기와 기부대상 인지매체의 상호작용 효과에 관한 연구. 한국사회복지행정학, 11(2), 215-254.
고정원, 이성림, 김민정 (2010). 소비자의 로하스 소비의식과 로하스 상품소비. 소비자학연구, 21(4), 89-112.
구장옥, 이호배 (2015). 공익연계마케팅 활동이 구매의도에 미치는 영향. 대한경영학회지, 28(12), 3211-3233.
김기옥, 유현정 (1998). 필수품과 사치품에 대한 소비자인지를 통해 본 소비행동의 사회, 문화적 함의. 생활과학, 1, 167-197.
김윤환 (2012). 기업의 사회적 책임(CSR)활동이 고객충성도 및 프리미엄 가격 지불의도에 미치는 영향: CSR 진정성 정도의 조절효과를 중심으로. 동아대학교 대학원 박사학위 논문.
김인섭, 김은정 (1999). 가격 프리미엄과 지각된 품질평가간의 관계에 관한 연구. 산업경제연구소, 12(6), 13-30.
김자경, 김정현 (2001). 공익연계 마케팅이 소비자 반응에 미치는 효과. 광고학연구, 12(3), 31-52.
김주원, 김용준 (2008). 자선단체 기부자의 기부동기와 기부행동에 관한 실증연구. 경영학연구, 37(3), 629-658.
대한상공회의소 (2012. 05. 21). 윤리적 소비에 대한 소비자 인식 조사. http://retaildb.korcham.net/Service/Report/appl/ActualResearchView.asp?nkey=1141에서 2015. 09. 22 인출.
마크로밀엠브레인 (2015. 12. 30). 2015 기부 관련 인식 조사. https://www.trendmonitor.co.kr/tmweb/trend/allTrend/detail.do?bIdx=1400&code=0403&trendType=CKOREA에서 2016. 02. 08 인출.
민승기 (2013). 이기적 vs. 이타적 소비에서 도덕적 규제의 효과. 고려대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문.
박나랑, 손상희 (2013). 소비자의 사회적 기업상품 구매지속의도에 미치는 영향요인 연구. 소비문화연구, 16(4), 143-169.
박은아, 허연주, 유홍구 (2005). 공익연계 광고에서 브랜드-공익의 관련성과 소비자 참여 방법이 광고효과에 미치는 영향. 한국방송학보, 19(1), 286-325.
박현정, 이상환 (2012). 기업의 사회적 책임활동과 공정무역제품 신뢰, 구매의도, 프리미엄가격 지불의도와의 관계. 상품학연구, 30(7), 103-122.
서해진 (2012). 비영리단체에 대한 기부충동이 기부의도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 부산대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문.
성영신, 민승기, 강정석 (2013). 이타적 소비의 이면: 자기 이익과 타인 이익 추구의 균형 맞추기. 한국심리학회지: 소비자·광고, 14(4), 681-703.
양 윤, 윤정화 (2013). 기업의 사회적 책임, 기업 명성, 사회적 가치지향이 브랜드 태도에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 소비자·광고, 14(3), 409-426.
이공섭 (1998). 관여도와 제품유형이 소비자만족에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 상품학연구, 19, 141-168.
이수애, 이성태 (2009). 개인의 기부행위에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구. 한국사회복지행정학, 11(3), 69-95.
이종만 (2006). 공익의 특성요인이 소비자의 브랜드 태도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 중앙대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문.
정민주, 박정은, 박민혜 (2015). 개인기부자들의 과거 기부경험만족이 기부의도 및 충성도에 미치는 영향. 소비문화연구, 18(2), 1-19.
정지은, 이한준, 박종철 (2015). 비영리 단체 이미지가 기부의도에 미치는 영향. 소비자학연구, 26(2), 93-118.
정효선, 이수범, 윤혜현 (2009). 외식기업의 사회적 책임 활동에 대한 인식이 고객의 행동 의도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 호텔경영학연구, 18(6), 129-152.
조형기, 박종선, 박주영 (2010). 공익연계마케팅에서의 제품속성 및 기부제시방식에 따른 소비자의 기부수준인식. 생산성논집(구 생산성연구), 24(4), 93-121.
최자영, 최윤식 (2011). 공익연계 마케팅 메시지 제시 여부가 제품평가에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구: 광고소구유형과 제품유형의 조절효과를 중심으로. 소비자학연구, 22(3), 115-138.
한승희, 김혜지 (2014). 가격할인 대 기부와 연계된 가격할인이 소비자의 구매의도에 미치는 차별적 효과에 관한 연구. 마케팅연구, 29(2), 121-144.
허은정 (2011). 소비자의 윤리적 상품에 대한 태도 및 구매의도의 관련 요인 분석. 소비자학연구, 22(2), 89-111.
Arora, N., & Henderson, T. (2007). Embedded premium promotion: Why it works and how to make it more effective. Marketing Science, 26(4), 514-531.
Ba, S., & P. A. Pavlou (2002). Evidence of the Effect of Trust Building Technology in Electronic Markets: Price Premiums and Buyer Behavior. MIS Quarterly, 26(3), 1-26.
Barone, M. J., Miyazaki, A. D., & Taylor, K. A. (2000). The influence of cause-related marketing on consumer choice: does one good turn deserve another?. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2), 248-262.
Bendapudi, N., Singh, S. N., & Bendapudi, V. (1996). Enhancing helping behavior: An integrative framework for promotion planning. Journal of Marketing, 60(3), 33-49.
Brown, T. J., & Dacin, P. A. (1997). The company and the product: Corporate associations and consumer product responses. Journal of Marketing, 61(1), 68-84.
Business in the Community(BITC) (1996a). Business in the Community Quantitative Cause-Related Marketing Research: The Corporate Survey I, conducted by Research International(UK).
Business in the Community(BITC) (1996b). Business in the Community Quantitative Cause-Related Marketing Research: The Corporate Survey Ⅱ, conducted by Research International(UK).
De Pelsmacker, P., Driesen, L., & Rayp, G. (2005). Do consumers care about ethics? Willingness to pay for fair‐trade coffee. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 39(2), 363-385.
Dhar, R., & Simonson, I. (1999). Making complementary choices in consumption episodes: Highlighting versus balancing. Journal of Marketing Research, 36(1), 29-44.
Dhar, R., & Wertenbroch, K. (2000). Consumer choice between hedonic and utilitarian goods. Journal of Marketing Research, 37(1), 60-71.
Dunning, D. (2007). Self-image motives and consumer behavior: How sacrosanct self-beliefs sway preferences in the marketplace. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(4), 237-249.
Foreh, M. R., & Grier, S. (2003). When is honesty the best policy? The effect of stated company intent on consumer skepticism. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(3), 349-356.
Henderson, T., & Arora, N. (2010). Promoting brands across categories with a social cause: Implementing effective embedded premium programs. Journal of Marketing, 74(6), 41-60.
Hirschman, E. C., & Holbrook, M. B. (1982). Hedonic consumption: emerging concepts, methods and propositions. Journal of Marketing, 46(3) 92-101.
Hsee, C. K. (1995). Elastic justification: How tempting but task-irrelevant factors influence decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62(3), 330-337.
Khan, U., & Dhar, R. (2006). Licensing effect in consumer choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(2), 259-266.
Kivetz, R., & Simonson, I. (2002a). Earning the right to indulge: Effort as a determinant of customer preferences toward frequency program rewards. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(2), 155-170.
Kivetz, R., & Simonson, I. (2002b). Self-control for the righteous: Toward a theory of precommitment to indulgence. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(2), 199-217.
Kivetz, R., & Zheng, Y. (2006). Determinants of justification and self-control. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 135(4), 572-587.
Lichtenstein, D. R., Drumwright, M. E., & Braig, B. M. (2004). The effect of corporate social responsibility on customer donations to corporate-supported nonprofits. Journal of Marketing, 68(4), 16-32.
Loureiro, M. L., & Lotade, J. (2005). Do fair trade and eco-labels in coffee wake up the consumer conscience?. Ecological Economics, 53(1), 129-138.
Merritt, A. C., Effron, D. A., & Monin, B. (2010). Moral self‐licensing: When being good frees us to be bad. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(5), 344-357.
Okada, E. M. (2005). Justification effects on consumer choice of hedonic and utilitarian goods. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(1), 43-53.
Piliavin, J. A., & Charng, H. W. (1990). Altruism: A review of recent theory and research. Annual Review of Sociology, 27-65.
Pringle, H., Thompson, M. (1999). Brand spirit: How Cause-Related Marketing Builds Brands. Great Britain: John Wiley & Sons.
Ross, J. K., Patterson, L. T., & Stutts, M. A. (1992). Consumer perceptions of organizations that use cause-related marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 20(1), 93-97.
Simonson, I. (1989). Choice based on reasons: The case of attraction and compromise effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(2), 158-174.
Simonson, I., & Nowlis, S. M. (2000). The role of explanations and need for uniqueness in consumer decision making: Unconventional choices based on reasons. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(1), 49-68.
Starr, M. A. (2009). The social economics of ethical consumption: Theoretical considerations and empirical evidence. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 38(6), 916-925.
Strahilevitz, M. A. (1999). The effects of product type and donation magnitude on willingness to pay more for a charity-linked brand. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 8(3), 215-241.
Strahilevitz, M. A., & Myers, J. (1998). Donations to charity as purchase incentives: How well they work may depend on what you are trying to sell. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 434-446.
Thaler, R. (1985). Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Science, 4(3), 199-214.
Wertenbroch, K. (1998). Consumption self-control by rationing purchase quantities of virtue and vice. Marketing Science, 17(4), 317-337.
Winterich, K. P., & Barone, M. J. (2011). Warm glow or cold, hard cash? Social identity effects on consumer choice for donation versus discount promotions. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(5), 855-868.