바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

The Influence of Ingredient Sales on Product Evaluation

Abstract

From time to time, we find that some restaurants sell food products as well as ingredients of them. For example, a cafe selling tomato juice also sells tomatoes. This research investigates whether the sales of ingredients(e.g., tomatoes) affects consumers evaluation of final food products(e.g., tomato juice). Using a print advertising of a mango salad, Study 1 showed that the perceived quality of ingredients used for the mango salad increases when the store also sells ingredients(i.e., mangos) compared with when the store does not. We suggested illusory causation as a psychological mechanism. That is, when consumers are exposed to the message that ingredients is available for purchase, they make an erroneous inference that the ingredients being sold as stand-alone products would be used for a final product. Furthermore, relying on the price-quality association, they believe that the ingredient for sale has good quality worth the money. Consequently, the final product believed to be made of the good ingredient is evaluated more positively. To examine our contention, Study 2 employed two conditions: one is the ingredient(i.e., mangos)-selling condition and the other is the same but with an extra message that the mangos for sale are different from the mangos in the salad. This manipulation prevents consumers from connecting the ingredients for sale with the final product and thus removes the basis on which consumers evaluate the final product positively. As expected, the perceived quality of ingredients used for the mango salad decreases in the latter condition. Aiming to enhance the generalizability of our research, Study 3 used a print ad of a strawberry juice and obtained the same results with Study 1 & 2. Furthermore, the sales of ingredients(i.e, strawberries) also increases the purchase intention of a final product(i.e., strawberry juice). In addition, Study 3 removed the alternative account that ingredient sales increases the perceived variety of selling items and thus the store is perceived as having greater expertise, which in turn leads to the positive evaluation of the final product sold in the store.

keywords
Ingredient sales, Product evaluation, Illusory causality, Price-quality association

Reference

1.

Ares, G., & Deliza, R. (2010). Studying the influence of package shape and colour on consumer expectations of milk desserts using word association and conjoint analysis. Food Quality and Preference, 21(8), 930-937.

2.

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.

3.

Bauer, R. A. (1960). Consumer behavior as risk taking. Dynamic marketing for a changing world, 389-398.

4.

Berger, J., Draganska, M., & Simonson, I. (2007). The influence of product variety on brand perception and choice. Marketing Science, 26(4), 460-472.

5.

Choe, Y. C., Park, J., Chung, M., & Moon, J. (2009). Effect of the food traceability system for building trust: Price premium and buying behavior. Information Systems Frontiers, 11(2), 167-179.

6.

Cronley, M. L., Posavac, S. S., Meyer, T., Kardes, F. R., & Kellaris, J. J. (2005). A selective hypothesis testing perspective on price-Quality inference and inference-based Choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15(2), 159-169.

7.

Desai, K. K., & Keller, K. L. (2002). The effects of ingredient branding strategies on host brand extendibility. Journal of Marketing, 66(1), 73-93.

8.

Dutton, D. G., & Aron, A. P. (1974). Some evidence for heightened sexual attraction under conditions of high anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30(4), 510-517.

9.

Gneezy, A., Gneezy, U., & Lauga, D. O. (2014). A reference-dependent model of the price-quality heuristic. Journal of Marketing Research, 51(2), 153-164.

10.

Guéguen, N. (2003). The effect of glass colour on the evaluation of a beverage's thirst-quenching quality. Current Psychology Letters, 11(2), 1-6.

11.

Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.

12.

Haws, K. L., Reczek, R. W., & Sample, K. L. (2016). Healthy diets make empty wallets: The healthy=expensive intuition. Journal of Consumer Research, 43(6), 992-1007.

13.

Irmak, C., Vallen, B., & Robinson, S. R.(2011), The impact of product name on dieters' and nondieters' food evaluation and consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(2), 390-405.

14.

Kardes, F. R., Cronley, M. L., Kellaris, J. J., & Posavac, S. S. (2004). The role of selective information processing in price-quality inference. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(2), 368-374.

15.

Lalwani, A. K., & Forcum, L. (2016). Does a dollar get you a dollar’s worth of merchandise? The impact of power distance belief on price-quality judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 43(2), 317-333.

16.

McArthur, L. Z. (1980). Illusory causation and illusory correlation: Two epistemological accounts. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6(4), 507-519.

17.

Norris, D. G. (1992). Ingredient branding: a strategy option with multiple beneficiaries. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 9(3), 19-31.

18.

Pavlou, P. A., Liang, H., & Xue, Y. (2007). Understanding and mitigating uncertainty in online exchange relationships: A principal- agent perspective. MIS quarterly, 31(1), 105- 136.

19.

Ratcliff, J. J., Lassiter, G. D., Schmidt, H. C., & Snyder, C. J. (2006). Camera perspective bias in videotaped confessions: Experimental evidence of its perceptual basis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 12(4), 197-206.

20.

Raghubir, P. (2005). Framing a price bundle: the case of “buy/get” offers. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 14(2), 123-128.

21.

Robinson, J., & McArthur, L. Z. (1982). Impact of salient vocal qualities on causal attribution for a speaker's behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(2), 236.

22.

Shiv, B., Carmon, Z., & Ariely, D. (2005). Placebo effects of marketing actions: Consumers may get what they pay for. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(4), 383-393.

23.

Suzuki, M., Kimura, R., Kido, Y., Inoue, T., Moritani, T., & Nagai, N. (2017). Color of hot soup modulates postprandial satiety, thermal sensation, and body temperature in young women. Appetite, 114, 209-216.

24.

Taylor, S. E., & Fiske, S. T. (1975). Point of view and perceptions of causality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(3), 439-445.

25.

Taylor, S. E., & Fiske, S. T. (1978). Salience, attention, and attribution: Top of the head phenomena. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 249-288.

26.

Vaidyanathan, R., & Aggarwal, P. (2000). Strategic brand alliances: implications of ingredient branding for national and private label brands. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 9(4), 214-228.

27.

Verbeke, W., & Ward, R. W. (2006). Consumer interest in information cues denoting quality, traceability and origin: An application of ordered probit models to beef labels. Food Quality and Preference, 17(6), 453-467.

28.

White, G. L., & Kight, T. D. (1984). Misattribution of arousal and attraction: Effects of salience of explanations for arousal. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 20(1), 55-64.

29.

Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197-206.

logo