A study on the profile analysis of self-regulated learning with Korean high school students
Abstract
Self-regulated learning (SRL) is a multi-dimensional construct that has been difficult to operationalize using traditional, variable-centered methodologies. This study takes a person-centered approach to the study of SRL in a sample of 1,431 high school students. The purpose of the this study is to examine potential subgroups of self-regulated learners. Using latent profile analysis on self-reports of nine variables of SRL, three profiles were identified: high SRL, low SRL, and average SRL. The largest profile was ‘average SR type’ which were roughly average across all variables. The high SR type was the next largest, and the low SR type was the least prevalent profile observed. High SR type showed high learning motivation and excellent academic ability. They reported high level of academic achievement and spent much more time on their studying. On the other hand, low SR type showed low learning motivation and high negative academic emotions and high learned helplessness. Average SR type reported average level of learning motivation and high test anxiety. Two advantages of the current study over these previous works were the use of LPA and the use of a broader set of SRL variables. These results in this study can help establish the directions for academic counseling or education programs tailored to the characteristics of each type.
- keywords
- 잠재프로파일분석, 자기조절학습, 학습유형, Self-Regulated Learning, Latent Profile Analysis, Types of Learners
Reference
김아영 (2002). 학업동기 척도 표준화 연구. 교육평가연구, 15(1), 157-184.
김은정, 양연숙 (2011). 영재아와 일반아의 시험불안, 학업스트레스 및 학업효능감 비교연구. 영재와 영재교육, 10(1), 123-142.
김은진, 양명희 (2013). 학업상황에서 정서조절이 학업성취도에 미치는 영향: 정서 및학습전략을 매개로 하는 관계구조 검증. 한국심리학회지: 학교, 10(1), 201-218.
김주환, 김은주, 홍세희 (2006). 한국 남녀 중학생 집단에서 자기결정성이 학업성취도에 주는 영향. 교육심리연구, 20(1), 243-264.
문병상 (2000). 자기조절학습전략 훈련이 아동의 학업 수행에 미치는 효과. 교육학논총, 20(2), 61-75.
박승호 (2003). 중학생의 자기조절학습 유형에관한 군집분석 연구. 교육심리연구, 17(4), 1-16.
박승호, 박지희 (2003). 중학생의 자기조절학습에 관여하는 초인지, 초동기 및 의지통제와 학업성취와의 관계. 교육심리연구, 17(4), 1-17.
박승호 (2013). 자기조절학습의 현재와 미래과제. 교육심리연구, 27(3), 629-646.
손종식 (1993). 학년 및 성별에 따른 자기제어학습수준과 학업성취 및 지능과의 관계. 동아대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.
신이나, 손원숙 (2012). 영재와 일반 중학생의성취목표지향성 프로파일 분석: 개인-중심적 접근의 활용. 한국심리학회지: 학교, 9(1), 65-83.
신종호 (2002). 저성취 학습부진아동을 위한학습전략 프로그램에 대한 분석적 고찰. 아시아교육연구, 3(1), 63-88.
안미경, 정영란 (2012). 초등 과학수업에서 자기조절학습 유형에 관한 질적 사례 연구. 초등교육연구, 25(2), 285-305.
양명희 (2013). 자기조절학습 검사지(Self Regulated Learning Test: SLT). 한국가이던스.
양명희, 권재기 (2013). 청소년들의 학업정서지각 유형과 자기조절학습과의 관련성. 한국청소년연구, 24(4), 203-229.
양명희, 김은진 (2012). 학업상황의 정서조절척도 개발 연구. 교육학연구, 50(3), 253-275.
윤연기, 김판희 (2012). 자기조절학습 구성요인과 교과별 학업성취와의 관계. 아동교육, 21(2), 197-212.
이경아, 유나현, 이은경, 전주연, 이기학 (2004). 학습 성격 유형 및 전공 만족도에 따른학업성취 관련 변인에 관한 연구. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 치료, 16(1), 104-121.
이은주 (2000). 초등학생들의 학습동기의 변화. 초등교육연구, 14(1), 47-66.
이종승, 조난희 (2001). 학업상황에서 성공-실패 경험이 성취기대와 정서에 미치는 영향. 교육발전논총, 22(2), 25-36.
이후희, 황순영 (2011). 자기조절학습전략을 통한 읽기 중재가 주의력결핍과잉행동장애아동의 읽기 이해력과 읽기 태도에 미치는 영향. 정서․행동장애연구, 27(1), 1-21.
임효진, 황매향 (2012). 학습동기, 자기통제, 학습전략을 중심으로 한 초등학생의 잠재집단분석. 초등교육연구, 25(3), 27-54.
정은정 (2005). 자기조절학습훈련이 학습부진아의 자기효능감과 학업성취에 미치는 효과. 초등교육학연구, 12(1), 153-174.
Abara, B., & Lokena, E. (2010). Self-regulated learning and self-directed study in a pre-college sample. Learning Individual Difference, 20(1), 25-29.
Boekaerts, M., & Corno, L. (2005). Self-regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54(2), 199-231.
Braten, I., & Olaussen, B S. (2005). Profiling individual differences in student motivation: A longitudinal cluster-analytic study in different academic contexts. Contemporary Educational Psychologist. 30, 359-396.
Caprara, G., Fida, R., Vecchione, M., Del Bove, G., Vecchio, G., Barbaranelli, C., (2008). Longitudinal analysis of the role of perceived self-efficacy for self-regulated learning in academic continuance and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 525-534.
Cleary, T. J., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2004). Self-regulation empowerment program: A school-based program to enhance self-regulated and self- motivated cycles of student learning. Psychology in the Schools, 41, 537-550.
Duckworth, A. L., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2006). Self-discipline gives girls the edge: Gender in elf-discipline, grades, and achievement test scores. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 198-208.
Husman, J., & Shell, D. F. (2008). Beliefs and perceptions about the future: A Measurement of future time perspective. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 166-175.
Lubke, G., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Performance of Factor Mixture Models as a Function of Model Size, Covariate Effects, and Class-Specific Parameters. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(1), 26-47.
Magnusson, D. (1998). The logic and implications of a person-oriented approach. In. R. B. Cairns, L. R. Bergman, & J. Kagan(Eds.), Methods and Models for Studying the Individual(pp. 33-64). Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2000). The development of heavy drinking and alcohol-related problems from ages 18 to 37in a U. S. national sample. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 61, 290-300.
McLachlan, G. J., & Peel, D. (2000b). Mixture of factor analyzers. InLangley, P.(ed.), Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 599-606). Morgan Kaufmann, SanFrancisco.
Meece, J., & K. Holt. (1993). A pattern analysis of students’ achievement goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 582-590.
Nylund, K. (2007). Latent transition analysis:Modeling extensions and an application to peer victimization. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Deciding on the Number of Classes in Latent Class Analysis and Growth Mixture Modeling: A Monte Carlo Simulation Study. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(4), 535-569.
Nolen, S. (1988). Reasons for studying: Motivational orientations and study strategies. Cognition and Instruction, 5, 269-287.
Pastor, D. A., Barron, K. E., Miller, B. J., & Davis, S. L. (2007). A latent profile analysis of college students’ achievement goal orientation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 8-47.
Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 91-105.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation(pp. 452-502). San Diego, CA:Academic Press.
Pintrich, P. R., & Zusho, A. (2002). The development of academic self-regulation: The role of cognitive and motivational factors. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles, (Eds.), Development of Achievement Motivation(pp. 249-284). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Schunk, D. H. (1990). Goal setting and self-efficacy during self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 25, 71-86.
Tofighi, D., & Enders, C. K. (2008). Identifying the correct number of classes in growth mixture models. In G. R. Hancock & K. M. Samuelsen (Eds.) Advances in Latent Variable Mixture Models (pp. 317-341). Greenwich, CT:Information Age.
Usher, E. L., & Pajares, F. (2008). Self-Efficacy for Self-Regulated Learning: A Validation Study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68(3), 443-463.
Vermunt, J. K., & Magidson, J. (2002). Latent class cluster analysis. In: J. A. Hagenaars and A. L. McCutcheon (Eds.): Applied latent class analysis(pp. 89-106). Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Wang, W. (2007). Software-supported self-regulated learning strategies in an academic setting. from Simon Fraser University Library, School of Interactive Technology: http://hdl.handle.net/1892/4207.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2002). The development of competence beliefs, expectancies for success, and achievement values from childhood through adolescence. Development of achievement motivation(pp. 91-120). Academic Press.
Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D. R., & Cox, P. W. (1977). Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research, 47(1), 1-64.
Wolters, C. A. (2003). Regulation of Motivation:Evaluating an Underemphasized Aspect of Self-Regulated Learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(4), 189-205.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation:A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation(pp. 13-39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a selfregulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64-70.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning:Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 51.
- Downloaded
- Viewed
- 0KCI Citations
- 0WOS Citations