바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Korean Journal of School Psychology

메뉴

The Effects of Knowledge Manipulation on Schemas Formation

Abstract

This study was designed to examine the influences of changes in children's knowledge on prior knowledge. First graders recalled a series, if stories was examine as a function of personal knowledge about the main story character. Children's knowledge about the protagonist was manipulated prior to presentation of the stories, and the impressions on story were examined. A change in some of the children's impressions was then promoted, and the impact of this second knowledge manipulation on recall of previously heard stories was evaluated. This experiment was designed by two between factors(knowledge manipulation 1, 2) and one within factors(sessions). The results were analyzed using a repeated measure ANOVA. The results indicated that children's story recall was affected by second knowledge. Children revised their story reports in ways that were consistent with their newly acquired impressions.

keywords
prior knowledge, knowledge manipulation, attitude, schemas, 사전지식, 지식조작, 태도, 도식

Reference

1.

Anderson, R. C., & Pitchart, J. W. (1978). Recall of previously recallable information following a shift in perspective. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verval Behavior, 17, 1-12.

2.

Adorno, T. W. (1986). The Jargon of Authenticity, London: Routledge & kegan paul.

3.

Abelson, R. P. (1972). “Are Attitudes Necessary?” Attitudes, Conflicts, and Social Change: New York: Academic press

4.

Chi, M. T. H. (1978). Knowledge structures in memory development. In Siegler (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior, 20, 91-142. New York: Academic Press.

5.

Greenhoot, A. F. (2000). Remembering and understanding, The effects of Changes in Underlying Knowledge on Children's Recollections, Child Development, 71, 1309-1328.

6.

Heyman, G. D., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Children's thinking about traits: Implications thinking for judgments of the self and others. Child Development, 69, 391-403.

7.

Kruglanski, A. W., & Webster, D. M. (1993). Motivated resistance and openness to persuasion in the presence or absence of prior information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 861-876.

8.

Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolution, University of Chicago press.

9.

MaGuire, W. J. (1964). Inducing Resistance to Persuation: some contemporary approaches. Advance in Experimental Social Psychology, 1(1), 191-229.

10.

Marsh, H. W. (1990). A multidimensional, hierarchical model of self concept: Theoretical and empirical justification. Educational Psychology Review, 2, 77-172.

11.

Marshall, S. P. (1995). Schema in problem solving. New York: Cambridge University Press.

12.

Rethans, A. J. (1986). Effect of Television Commercial Repetition, Journal of Marketing Research, 23(5), 50-61.

13.

Rokeach. (1974). “Attitude” in David L. sills, International Encyclopedia of Social Sciences, Macmillan Company. 1. 378-405.

14.

Ross, M. (1989). Relation of implicit theories to the construction of personal histories. Psychological Review, 96, 341-357.

15.

Sawyer, A. G. (1974). The Effect of Repetition and Supportive Advertising Appeals, Journal of Marketing Research, 23(5), 50-61.

16.

Schommer, M. (2004). Explaining the Epistemological Belief System: Introducing the Embedded Systemic Model and Coordinated Research Approach, Educational Psychologist, 39, 19-29.

17.

Shaffer, D. R. (2000). Social and Personality Development. Belmont, CA, USA: Thomson Learning.

18.

Singh, S, N. (1988). Recognition as a Measure of Learning from Television Commercials, Journal of Marketing Research, 20, 35-248.

19.

Woodward. A. E. (1973). Recall and Recognition as a Function of Primary Rehearsal, Journal of Marketing Research, 10, 608-617.

Korean Journal of School Psychology