바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Korean Journal of School Psychology

Differences of Frontal Lobe Executive Function according to Delinquency Juveniles Type: with special reference to Life Course Persistent Type and Adolescents Limited Type

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyse differences in frontal lobe executive function of delinquency juveniles. In order to find out fundamental factors of the delinquency, this study divided the group into Adolescence- Limited and Life-Course-Persistent Delinquency juveniles with the use of delinquent classification scale. Then, this study was executed by three main neuro-psychological assessment scales(Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, Tower of Hanoi, go-no-go and the like) to compare the differences of the executive function between sub-domain groups. The participants are normal juvenile group(n=28), Adolescence-Limited Delinquency juveniles(n=23), and Life-Course-Persistent Delinquency juveniles(n=27). The Results indicate that first, in the course of using WCST(Wisconsin Card Sorting Test), there were significant differences in cognitive flexibility between normal juveniles and Adolescence-Limited and Life-Course-Persistent Delinquency juveniles. Second, there were differences between normal and delinquent juveniles on the Tower of Hanoi Test which is assessed the planning and organizing ability, but no outstanding differences between the sub-domain delinquent groups at the first operation except the concept of the planning time. Third, through the Stroop Task, the study was also able to focus on differences of self-control and inhibition between Adolescence-Limited and Life-Course-Persistent Delinquency juveniles. These result suggested that by indicating the hypothesis about the defect of the executive function of the delinquent juveniles and shedding light on the differences between sub-group of them, it is possible to hypothesize that there was defect or developmental immaturity on the frontal lobe of the delinquent juveniles. This study is important in that it is proved that there was neurological defect only in Life-Course-Persistent Delinquency juveniles with the neuro-psychological assessment scales. Moreover, the more effective measures for the proper guidance and education can be put into effect by reasoning the causes of juvenile delinquency.

keywords
Frontal Lobe Executive Function, Juvenile Delinquency, Adolescence-Limited Delinquency Juveniles, Life-Course- Persistent Delinquency Juveniles, 전두엽 실행기능, 비행청소년, 평생지속형, 청소년기 제한형

Reference

1.

곽금주, 박혜원, 김청택 (2001). K-WISC-Ⅲ(한국 웩슬러 아동 지능검사) 지침서. 서울: 도서출한 특수교육.

2.

김홍근 (2001). Kims 전두엽-관리기능 신경심리검사 해설서. 대구: 도서출판 신경심리.

3.

법무연수원 (2009). 2009 범죄 백서.

4.

송지영 (2010). 초등학교 아동의 부모애착과 친구애착이 남녀 청소년 비행에 미치는 영향: 문제행동과 비행 친구 유무의 매개효과. 이화여자대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.

5.

양계민 (2002). 범죄 청소년 유형에 대한 Moffitt 이론의 검증 및 척도 개발. 중앙대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.

6.

오상우 (1989). 한국판 Stroop 색채단어 간섭검사. 원광정신의학, 5(1-4), 53-68.

7.

정혜영 (2000). 품행장애자의 전두엽 실행기능의 결핍. 중앙대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.

8.

Aronowitz, B., Liebowitz, M., Hollander, E., Fazzini, E., Durlach-Misteli, C., Frenkel, M., Moscovich, S., Garfinkel, R., Saoud, J., & DelBene, D. (1994). Neuropsychiatric and neuropsychological findings in conduct disorder and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 6, 245-249.

9.

Barkley, R. A. (1997). Behavioral Inhibition, Sustained Attention, and Executive Function: Construction a unifying theory of ADHD. Psychological Bulletin. 121, 65-94.

10.

Broys, S. V., Spitz, H. H., & Dorans, B. A. (1982). Tower of honoi performance of retarded young adults and nonretarded children as a function of solution length and goal state. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 22, 87-110.

11.

Damasio, A. R. & Anderson, S. W. (1993). The frontal loves. In K. M. Heilman & E. Valenstein (Eds.), Clinical Neuropyshcology (pp. 409-460). New York: Oxford University Press.

12.

Dempster, F. N. (1992). The rise and fall of the inhibitory mechanism: Tower a unified theory of cognitive development and aging. Developmental Review, 12, 45-75.

13.

Duffy, J. D., & Campbell, J. J. Ⅲ. (1994). The regional prefrontal syndromes: A theoretical and clinical review. The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 6, 379-387.

14.

Filley, C. M. (1995). Neurobehavioral Anatomy. Niwot, CO: University Press of Colorade.

15.

Helence, R, W., Marsha, E, B., & Steven, B. (2001). Adolescence-limited versus persistent delinquency: Extending Moffitt's hypothesis into adulthood. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110(4), 600-609.

16.

Hodges, J. R. (1994). Cognitive assessment for clinicians. New York: Oxford University Press.

17.

Happe, F. G. E. & Frith, U. (1996). The neuropsychology of autism. Brain, 119, 1377-1400. http://puzzllo.co.kr/flash/flash/hanoi/hanoi.html

18.

Hurt, J., & Naglieri, J. A. (1992). Performance of delinquent and nondelinquent males on planning, attention, simultaneous, and successive cognitive processing tasks. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 48, 120-128.

19.

Kendel, E. & Freed, D. (1989). Frontal-lobe dysfunction and antisocial behavior: A review. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 45(3), 404-413.

20.

Klein, M. W. (1995). The American stress gang: Its nature, Prevalence, and control, New York: Oxford University Press.

21.

Kimberg, D. Y. & Farah, M. J. (1993). A unified account of cognitive impairments following frontal lobe damage: The role of working memory in complex, organized behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 122(4), 411-428.

22.

Langley, D. (1989). A Developmental Model of Juvenile Delinquency Based on Neuropsychological Variables. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, California School of Professional Psychology, Fresno.

23.

Lueger, R. J. & Gill, K. J. (1990). Frontal-lobe cognitive dysfunction in conduct disorder adolescents. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 46, 696-706.

24.

Moffitt, T. E. (1993). Adolescent-Limited and Life-Course-Persistent Antisocial Behavior: A Developmental Taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100(4), 674-701.

25.

Ozonoff, S. (1998). Assessment and remediation of executive dysfunction in autism and Asperger syndrome. In E. Schopler, G. B. Mesibov, & L. J. Kunce(Eds.), Asperger Syndrome or High-functioning Autism(pp.263-289). New York: Plenum Press.

26.

Robert, K. H., Gordon, J. C., Jack, L. T., Gary, G. K., & Glenn, C. (1993). Wisconsin Card Sorting Test Manual-Revised and Expanded. Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.

27.

Sanderson, J. & Albert, M. (1984). Varicties of perseveration, Neuropsychologia, 22, 715-732.

28.

Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.

29.

Walsh, K. W. (1991). Understanding Brain Damage: A Pimer of Nuropsychological Ealuation (2nd ed.). New York: Churchill Livingstone.

30.

Welsh, M. C., Pennington, B. F., & Groisser, D. B. (1991). A normative-developmental study of executive function: A window on prefrontal function in children. Developmental Neuropsychology, 7, 131-149.

31.

Webber, J. (1997). Comprehending Youth Violence; A Practical Perspective. Remedial and Special Education, 18(2). 94-104.

32.

Wolff, P. H., Waber, D., Bauermeister, M., Cohen, C., & Ferber, R. (1982). The neuropsychological status of adolescent delinquent boys. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 23, 267-279.

33.

Yeudall, L. T., Fromm-Auch, D., & Davies, P. (1982). Neuropsychological impairment of persistent delinquency. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 170, 257-265.

Korean Journal of School Psychology