This study evaluated the operating characteristics and the efficiencies of PAI-A positive distortion indicators developed on adults(PIM, DEF, CDF) and KDF constructed on Korean high schoolers. High school students administrated PAI-A under two conditions: positive impression instruction and standard instruction. The profile of positive dissimulation had high score on PIM, RXR, DOM, WRM, MAN and almost all clinical scales were lower than average. Through analysis of effect size and ROC curves to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the measures using different cutoff scores, the order of the efficiency of positive distortion indicators are KDF, PIM, DEF and CDF. Review of the identification rate estimates for each cutoff score indicates that the sum of sensitivity and specificity on specific cutoff score of KDF, PIM, DEF are high but that of CDF is relatively low. These results suggest that KDF is effective on detecting the positive impression management as much as PIM and DEF developed on adults. Also, adapting more than one indicator are more effective to monitor the response distortion accurately.
고제원, 이규호, 이민희 (2010). 비행청소년의범죄유형별 PAI 프로파일. 법학연구, 39,157-176.
교육인적자원부 (2007). 대입전형선진화를 위한입학사정관제 지원계획안.
김영환, 김지혜, 오상우, 이수정, 조은경, 홍상황 (2006). 청소년 성격평가 질문지 실시요강. 서울: 학지사.
박은영 (2008). 판결전조사에 사용하는 심리검사의 이해. 범죄예방정책연구, 20, 201-249.
이남희, 이봉건 (2009). 비행청소년의 범죄유형에 따른 재범 위험성 차이에 관한 연구 -비행촉발요인 조사서와 PAI 검사결과를중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격,23, 127-140.
이수정, 조은경 (2004). 경찰단계에서의 소년범위험성 평가를 위한 비행촉발요인 조사도구개발. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격,19, 27-43.
홍상황, 김영환 (2001). PAI 무선반응과 인상관리의 탐지: Ⅱ. 탐지지표의 구성을 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 20, 751-761.
홍상황, 한태희, 장현정 (2010, 10). 진주교육대학교 입학사정관제 전형에서 인성검사(PAI-A)의 활용방안. 2010 입학사정관제지원사업 연구과제 보고서.
홍상황 (2001). PAI 반응태세의 탐지와 진단변별 기능분석. 경북대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.
Bare, R. A., & Wetter, M. W. (1997). Effects of information about validity scales on underreporting of symptoms on the Personality Assessment Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 68, 402-413.
Bornstein, R. F., Rossner, S. C., Hill, E. L., & Stepanian, M. L. (1994). Face validity and fakability of abjective and projective measures of dependency. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63, 363-386.
Cashel, M. L., Rogers, R., Sewell, K., & Martin-Cannici, C. (1995). The Personality Assessment Inventory and the detection of defensiveness. Assessment, 2, 333-342.
Fals-Stewart, W. (1996). The ability of individuals with psychoactive substance use disorders to escape detection by the Personality Assessment Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 8, 60-68.
Greene, R. L. (1991). The MMPI-2/MMPI-A: An interpretive manual. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Lanyon, R. I., Dannenbaum, S. E., Wolf, L. L., & Brown, A. R. (1989). Dimensions of deceptive responding in criminal offenders. Psychological Assessment, 1, 300-304.
Morey, L. C. (1991). Personality Assesment Inventory Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Morey, L. C. (1993, August). Defensiveness and malingering indices for the PAI. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Canada.
Morey, L. C. (1996). An interpretive guide to the Personality Assessment Inventory. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Morey, L. C., & Lanier, V. W. (1998). Operating characteristics for six response distortion indicators for the Personality Assessment Inventory. Assessment, 5, 203-214.
Peebles, J., & Moore, R. J. (1998). Detecting socially desirable responding with the Personality Assessment Inventory: The Positive Impression Management scale and the Defensiveness index. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 54, 621-628.
Rogers, R., Sewell, K. W., Morey, L. C., & Ustad, K. L. (1996). Detection of feigned mental disorders on the Personality Assessment Inventory: A discrimination analysis. Journal of Personality Assessment, 67, 629-640.
Shedler, J., Mayman, M. & Manis, M. (1993). The illusion of mental health. American Psychologist, 48, 1117-1131.