바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

A comparative study between countries on gender diversity, openness and innovation

East Asian Journal of Business Economics / East Asian Journal of Business Economics, (E)2288-2766
2022, v.10 no.1, pp.123-136
https://doi.org/10.20498/eajbe.2022.10.1.123
Jyldyz JOLCHUBEKOVA
Jae-Jin Kim
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Purpose – Diversity subject is rising globally, as the proportion of women in the workforce increased to a large extent and the variety of resources became greater. Diversity attempts have appealed more awareness to the value of female participation in various areas, notably in the boardroom and corporate governance. This study tests the relationships among gender diversity, openness, and innovation, at the firm level across countries from the MOI Survey. Research design, data, and methodology – In this study the relationships among gender diversity, openness, and innovation were investigated at the firm level across countries from the Management, Organisation, and Innovation (MOI) Survey. A cross-cultural analysis was conducted based on the empirical evidence from six countries: Germany, India, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, and Russia. Result – The results show that gender diversity is positively related to innovation performance, moreover openness is positively associated with the level of firm innovation. In addition, a company's capability to use knowledge from outside and the creation of new combinations positively influence a firm's potential to innovate. Conclusion – This study suggests that the more gender-diverse top management team and the higher openness may bring the firm’s innovation with greater possibility. the paper encourages more female participation on top management on the grounds of recommending that firms with greater gender diverse top management teams.

keywords
Gender Diversity, Innovation, Openness, TMT

Reference

1.

Adams, R., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291-309.

2.

Amabile, T. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In Staw, N., Cummings, L. (eds.), Research in Organizational Behaviour. Greenwich: JAI Press, 123-167.

3.

Amason, A., (1996). Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), 123-148.

4.

Bantel, K., & Jackson, S. (1989). Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference?. Strategic Management Journal, 10(S1), 107-124.

5.

Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.

6.

Bear, S., Rahman, N., & Post, C. (2010). The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(2), 209-221.

7.

Beckman, C., & Haunschild, P. (2002). Network learning: The effects of partners’ heterogeneity of experience on corporate acquisitions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(1), 92–124.

8.

Bernardi, R., Bosco, S., & Vassill, K. (2006). Does female representation on boards of directors associate with Fortune’s 100 best companies to work for list?. Business and Society, 45(2), 235-248.

9.

Bilimoria, D. (2000). Building the business case for women directors. In Burke, R., Mattis, M. (eds.), Women on Corporate Boards: International Challenges and Opportunities. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 25-40.

10.

Bilimoria, D., & Huse, M. (1997). A qualitative comparison of the boardroom experiences of U.S. and Norwegian women corporate directors. International Review of Women and Leadership, 3(2), 63-73.

11.

Bilimoria, D., & Wheeler, J. (2000). Women corporate directors: Current research and future directions. In Davidson, M., Burke, R. (eds.), Women in Management: Current Issues, Volume II. London: Sage, 138-163.

12.

Blackburn, V., Doran, B., & Shrader, C. (1994). Investigating the dimensions of social responsibility and the consequences for corporate financial performance. Journal of Managerial Issues, 6(2), 195-212.

13.

Breschi, S., Lissoni, F., & Malerba, F. (2003). Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification. Research Policy, 32(1), 69-87.

14.

Burke, R., & Nelson, D. (2002). Advancing women in management: Progress and prospects. In Burke, R., Nelson, D. (eds.), Advancing Women’s Careers. Oxford: Blackwell, 3–14.

15.

Burt, R. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

16.

Burt, R. (1997). The contingent value of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(2), 339-365.

17.

Campbell, K., & Minguez-Vera, A. (2008). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(3), 435-451.

18.

Carter, D., Simkins, B., & Simpson, G. (2003). Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. Financial Review, 38(1), 33-53.

19.

Carter, D., D’Souza, F., Simkins, B., & Simpson, G. (2010). The gender and ethnic diversity of US boards and board committees and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(5), 396-414.

20.

Catalyst (2007). 2007 Catalyst census of women board directors of the Fortune 1000. NY: Catalyst.

21.

Cohen, W., & Levinthal, D. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective of learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152.

22.

Cyert, R., & March, J. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. NJ: Prentice-Hall.

23.

Daft, R., & Lengel, R. (1984). Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organization design. Research in Organizational Behavior, 6, 191-233.

24.

Darmadi, S. (2013). Do women in top management affect firm performance? Evidence from Indonesia. MPRA. Retrieved from https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/38743/

25.

Dosi, G. (1988). Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation. Journal of Economic Literature, 26 (3), 1120-1171.

26.

Eagly, A., Johannesen-Schmidt, M., & van Engen, M. (2003). Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin, 129(4), 569-591.

27.

Erhardt, D., Werbel, J., & Shrader, C. (2003). Board of director diversity and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance, 11(2), 102-111.

28.

EOWA (2006). Equal opportunity for women in the workplace agency. 2006 EOWA Australian census of women in leadership. Retrieved from www.eowa.gov.au.

29.

EPWN (2004). European professional women’s network. The European PWN board women monitor 2004. Retrieved from www.europeanpwn.net/index.php?article_id=8.

30.

Fondas, N. (2000). Women on boards of directors: Gender bias or power threat? In Burke, R., Mattis, M. (eds.), Women on Corporate Boards of Directors. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic, 171-177.

31.

Garcia-Vega, M. (2006). Does technological diversification promote innovation? An empirical analysis for european firms. Research Policy, 35(2), 230–246.

32.

Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.

33.

Hambrick, D., Cho, T., & Chen, M. (1996). The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms’ competitive moves. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(4), 659-684.

34.

Hambrick, D., & Mason, P. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193-206.

35.

Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. (1994). Competing for the future: Breakthrough strategies for seizing control of your industry and creating the markets of tomorrow. Boston MA: Harvard Business School Press.

36.

Higgs, D. (2003). Review of the role and effectiveness of non executive directors. Retrieved from www.dti.gov.uk/cld/non_execs_review.

37.

Hillman, A., Cannella, A., & Harris, I. (2002). Women and racial minorities in the boardroom: How do directors differ?. Journal of Management, 28(6), 747-763.

38.

Hitt, M., & Tyler, B. (1991). Strategic decision models: Integrating different perspectives. Strategic Management Journal, 12(5), 327-351.

39.

Hoffman, L. (1959). Homogeneity of member personality and its effect on group problem solving. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58(1), 27-32.

40.

Hoffman, L., & Maier, N. (1961). Quality and acceptance of problem solutions by members of homogeneous and heterogeneous groups. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62(2), 401-407.

41.

Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills CA: Sage Publications.

42.

Hofstede, G. (1983). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(4), 625-629.

43.

Hofstede, G. (1993). Cultures and organisations: Software of the mind. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(1), 132- 134.

44.

Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organisations across nations. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publications.

45.

Hofstede, G., & Hofstede, G. (2005). Cultures and organisations: Software of the mind. US: McGraw-Hill.

46.

Holton, V. (1995). Corporate governance report surveying the situation for women directors in the UK. Corporate Governance, 3(2), 102-107.

47.

Ibarra, H. (1993). Personal networks of women and minorities in management: A conceptual framework. Academy of Management Review, 18(1), 56-87.

48.

Iles, P., & Auluck, R. (1993). Developing managers and organisations to manage and value differences. Presented at the 8th International Organisation Development Association World Congress, Cape Town, South Africa.

49.

International Monetary Fund (2009). The World Economic Outlook database. Retrieved from https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/weo-database.

50.

Jelinek, M., & Adler, N. (1988). Women: world-class managers for global competition. Academy of Management Executive, 2(1), 11-19.

51.

Johnson, R., & Greening, D. (1999). The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 564-576.

52.

Joshi, A., & Roh, H. (2009). The role of context in work team diversity research: A meta-analytic review. Academy of Management Journal, 52(3), 599-627.

53.

Kanter, R. (1977a). Men and women of the corporation. NY: Basic Books.

54.

Kanter. R. (1977b). Some effects of proportions on group life. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 965-990.

55.

Kanter, R. (1983). The change masters. NY: Simon and Schuster.

56.

Kearney, E., & Gebert, D. (2009). Managing diversity and enhancing team outcomes: The promise of transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 77-89.

57.

Lundvall, B. (1992). National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. UK London: Pinter Publishers.

58.

Maass, A., & Clark, R. (1984). Hidden impact of minorities: Fifteen years of minority influence research. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 428–450.

59.

Marimuthu, M., & Kolandaisamy, I. (2009). Can demographic diversity in top management team contribute for greater financial performance? An empirical discussion. Journal of International Social Research, 8(2), 273-286.

60.

Mattis, M. (2000). Women corporate directors in the United States. In Burke, R., Mattis, M. (eds.), Women on Corporate Boards of Directors: International Challenges and Opportunities. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 43- 56.

61.

Miller, T., & Triana, M. (2009). Demographic diversity in the boardroom: Mediators of the board diversity-firm performance relationship. Journal of Management Studies, 46(5), 755-786.

62.

Mintzberg, H., Raisinghani, D., & Theoret, A. (1976). The structure of “unstructured” decision processes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(2), 246-274.

63.

MOI Survey (2008). Note on sampling methodology. Management, Organisation and Innovation (MOI) Survey. Retrieved from https://www.ebrd.com/downloads/research/economics/microdata/moisampling.pdf.

64.

Murray, A. (2009). Top management group heterogeneity and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 10(SI), 125-141.

65.

Nelson, R., & Winter, S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge MA and London: Harvard University Press.

66.

Nemeth, C. (1986). Differential contributions of majority and minority influence. Psychological Review, 93(1), 23- 32.

67.

Nemeth, C., & Kwan, J. (1985). Originality of word associations as a function of majority vs. minority influence. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48(3), 277-282.

68.

Nemeth, C., & Wachtler, J. (1983). Creative problem solving as a result of majority and minority Influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 13(1), 45-55.

69.

OECD (2009). The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved from https://data.oecd.org/.

70.

O’Reilly, C. (1983). The use of information in organizational decision making: A model and some propositions. Research in Organizational Behavior, 5, 103-140.

71.

Ostergaard, C., Timmermans, B., & Kristinsson, K. (2011). Does a different view create something new? The effect of employee diversity on innovation. Research Policy, 40(3), 500-509.

72.

Pelled, L., Eisenhardt, K., & Xin, K. (1999). Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 1-28.

73.

Priem, R., Harrison, D., & Muir, N. (1995). Structured conflict and consensus outcomes in group decision making. Journal of Management 21(4), 691-710.

74.

Rasmussen, J., & Huse, M. (2011). Corporate governance in Norway: Women directors and employee elected board members. In Mallin C. (eds.), International Corporate Governance, 121-146.

75.

Richard, O. (2000). Racial diversity, business strategy, and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 43(2), 164-177.

76.

Richard, O., Murthi, B., & Ismail, K. (2007). The impact of racial diversity on intermediate and long term performance: The moderating role of environmental context. Strategic Management Journal, 28(12), 1213-1233.

77.

Robertson, M., Swan, J., & Newell, S. (1996). The role of networks in the diffusion of technological innovation. Journal of Management Studies, 33(3), 333-359.

78.

Rosener, J. (1995). America's competitive secret: Utilizing women as a management strategy. NY: Oxford University Press.

79.

Salloum, C., Jabbour, G., & Mercier-Suissa, C. (2019). Democracy across gender diversity and ethnicity of Middle Eastern SMEs: How does performance differ?. Journal of Small Business Management, 57(1), 255-267.

80.

Smith, N., Smith, V., & Verner, M. (2006). Do women in top management affect firm performance? A panel study of 2,500 Danish firms. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 55(7), 569-593.

81.

Shrader, C., Blackburn, V., & Iles, P. (1997). Women in management and firm financial performance: An exploratory study. Journal of Managerial Issues, 9(3), 355-372.

82.

Torchia, M., Calabro, A., & Huse, M. (2011). Women directors on corporate boards: From tokenism to critical mass. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(2), 299-317.

83.

Throup, C. (1994). How might increasing the number of women in senior management positions help to improve corporate performance? (Excerpts from the winning essay, 1992. Guardian Women in Management Scholarship to Manchester Business School). The MBA Career Guide 17.

84.

Van der Vegt, G., & Janssen, O. (2003). Joint impact of interdependence and group diversity on innovation. Journal of Management, 29(5), 729-751.

85.

Van der Walt, N., & Ingley, C. (2003). Board dynamics and the influence of professional background, gender and racial diversity of directors. Corporate Governance, 11(3), 218-234.

86.

Watson, W., Kumar, K., & Michaelson, L. (1993). Cultural diversity’s impact on interaction process and performance: Comparing homogeneous and diverse task groups. Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 590-602.

87.

Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of practise and social learning systems. Organization, 7(2), 225-246.

88.

Westphal, J., & Milton, L. (2000). How experience and network ties affect the influence of demographic minorities on corporate boards. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(2), 336-398.

89.

Wiersema, M., & Bantel, K. (1992). Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Academy of Management Journal, 35(1), 91-121.

90.

Woodman, R., Sawyer, J., & Griffin, R. (1993). Toward a theory of organisational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293-321.

91.

Wools, D. (2007). Spain lawmakers, women’s equality law. MA: Associated Press.

92.

World Bank (2009). Data Catalog. Retrieved from https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/gdp-ranking.

93.

Zahra, S., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185-203.

94.

Zahra, S., Neubaum, D., & Huse, M. (2000). Entrepreneurship in medium-size companies: Exploring the effects of ownership and governance systems. Journal of Management, 26(5), 947-976.

East Asian Journal of Business Economics