바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Research Ethics of Plagiarism of Adult Learners

East Asian Journal of Business Economics / East Asian Journal of Business Economics, (E)2288-2766
2017, v.5 no.3, pp.41-47
https://doi.org/10.20498/eajbe.2017.5.3.41
HWANG HEE JOONG
Soo-Joon Chae

Abstract

Purpose - Adult learners are easily exposed to the risk of plagiarizing others' writings when writing papers or reports. Therefore, this study investigates the research ethics of adult learners and suggests alternatives for research ethics standards in online lifelong education system. The purpose of this study is to investigate the causes of violation of research ethics and preventive measures (education program) for adult learners. Research design, data, methodology - Before establishing a research ethics education plan, it is confirmed through the empirical investigation of adult learners in undergraduate. In this study, 30 questionnaires of 5-point Likert scale were used to examine the level of consciousness of adult learners related to research ethics. Results - First, the experience of participating in ethics education and the presence of prior knowledge did not affect the prevention of research ethics violation. Second, adult learners did not learn about research ethics in the pre-college education environment and they frequently engaged in research ethics violation without guilt or consciousness. Third, the students who experienced the research ethics violation (plagiarism) were more willing to know and use the plagiarism search program. Fourth, Opinions differed according to age as to the need to enforce research ethics compliance. Conclusions - Universities should clearly and easily announce and monitor plagiarism criteria or guidelines. When adult learners are relieved of the anxiety about the possibility of violation of research ethics, a developmental and original research atmosphere will be created.

keywords
Research Ethics, Plagiarism, Adult Learners

Reference

1.

Hwang, H. J., Kim, D. H., Youn, M. K., Lee, J. W., & Lee, J. W. (2014). The Standard of Judgment on Plagiarism in Research Ethics and the Guideline of Global Journals for KODISA. Journal of Distribution Science, 12(6), 15‐20.

2.

Hwang, H. J., Lee, J. H., Kim, D. H., Shin, D. J., Kim, B. G., Kim, T. J., Lee, Y. K., Kim, W. K., & Youn, M. K. (2017). Cases of Ethical Violation in Research Publications: Through Editorial Decision Making Process. Journal of Distribution Science, 15(5), 49-52.

3.

Hwang, H. J., Lee, J. H., Lee, J. W., Kim, Y. E., Yang, H. C., Youn, M. K., & Kim, D. H. (2015). Strengthening Publication Ethics for KODISA Journals: Learning from the Cases of Plagiarism. Journal of Distribution Science, 13(4), 5-8.

4.

Hwang, H. J., & Youn, M. K. (2016). Based on Proven Practices in Violation of Research Ethics for the KODISA Journals. The International Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 7(1), 5-10.

East Asian Journal of Business Economics