바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Regional Multinationals: Evidence from Wal-Mart’s Withdrawal from the South Korean Market

East Asian Journal of Business Economics / East Asian Journal of Business Economics, (E)2288-2766
2021, v.9 no.1, pp.53-61
https://doi.org/10.20498/eajbe.2021.9.1.53
Se-Yeon Ahn
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Purpose – This study aims to understand the phenomenon called “regional multinational” in the geographical expansion of multinational enterprises and to find some evidence whether globalization of multinational enterprises tends to have a strong home region bias. Research design, data, and methodology – Through an in-depth case analysis, we analyze the series of strategic behaviors Wal-Mart made in South Korea from its entry in 1998 to its withdrawal in 2006. Then, we discuss the plausible causes of this exit, seeking to provide some evidence on the “regional multinational” phenomenon. Result – This study finds some evidence on the regional-based expansion of multinational enterprises. Our case study shows that Wal-Mart in South Korea focused on global standardization strategy and made an exit from the market as they were faced with increasing localization demands. From the perspective of multinational enterprises’ globalization strategy, Wal-Mart’s exit from the South Korean market can be considered as a strategic exit. Conclusion – The findings of this study suggest that while national responsiveness and localized adaptation are considered as a panacea for penetrating international markets, in reality most multinational enterprises attempt to add value primarily by capitalizing on similarities across markets and remain as regional multinationals.

keywords
Regional Multinational, Firm specific advantages, Liability of foreignness, Localization strategy, Global integration strategy

Reference

1.

Birkinshaw, J., Hood, N., & Jonsson, S. (1988). Building firm‐specific advantages in multinational corporations: the role of subsidiary initiative. Strategic Management Journal, 19(3), 221-242.

2.

Boehe, D. M. (2011). Exploiting the liability of foreignness: Why do service firms exploit foreign affiliate networks at home? Journal of International Management, 17(1), 15-29.

3.

Burt, S., Coe, N. M., & Davies, K. (2019). A tactical retreat? Conceptualizing the dynamics of European grocery retail divestment from East Asia. International Business Review, 28(1), 177-189.

4.

Caves, R. E., & Caves, R. E. (1996). Multinational enterprise and economic analysis. Cambridge university press.

5.

Durand, C., & Wrigley, N. (2009). Institutional and economic determinants of transnational retailer expansion and performance: a comparative analysis of Wal-Mart and Carrefour. Environment and Planning A, 41(7), 1534-1555.

6.

Gandolfi, F., & Strach, P. (2009). Retail internationalization: gaining insights from the Wal-Mart experience in South Korea. Review of International Comparative Management, 10(1), 187-199.

7.

Gereffi, G., & Christian, M. (2009). The impacts of Wal-Mart: The rise and consequences of the world's dominant retailer. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 573–591

8.

Kim, R. B. (2008). Wal-Mart Korea: Challenges of entering a foreign market. Journal of Asia-Pacific Business, 9(4), 344-357.

9.

Kogut, B., & Singh, H. (1988). The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of international business studies, 19(3), 411-432.

10.

Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1993). Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. Journal of international business studies, 24(4), 625-645.

11.

Kuivalainen, O., Sundqvist, S., Saarenketo, S., McNaughton, R. B., D'Angelo, A., Majocchi, A., & Buck, T. (2013). Geographical pathways for SME internationalization: insights from an Italian sample. International Marketing Review, 30(2), 80-105

12.

Levitt, T. (1983). The Globalization of Markets, Harvard Business Review, 61 (May/June), 92-102.

13.

Narula, R., & Dunning, J. H. (2010). Multinational enterprises, development and globalization: Some clarifications and a research agenda. Oxford Development Studies, 38(3), 263-287.

14.

Ohmae, K. (1989). Managing in a borderless world. Harvard Business Review, 67(3), 152-161.

15.

Prahalad, C. K., & Doz. Y. (1987) The Multinational Mission. Balancing local demands and global vision, Simon and Schuster, New York.

16.

Rugman, A. M. (2003). Regional strategy and the demise of globalization. Journal of International Management, 9(4), 409-417.

17.

Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. (2004). A perspective on regional and global strategies of multinational enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(1), 3–18.

18.

Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. (2008). A new perspective on the regional and global strategies of multinational services firms. Management International Review, 48(4), 397–411.

19.

Verbeke, A., & Kano, L. (2016). An internalization theory perspective on the global and regional strategies of multinational enterprises. Journal of World Business, 51(1), 83-92.

20.

Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods, Sage publications.

21.

Zaheer, S. (1995). Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 341-363.

22.

Zhang, L., & Wei, Y. D. (2015). Foreign hypermarket retailers in China: spatial penetration, local embeddedness, and structural paradox. Geographical Review, 105(4), 528-550.

East Asian Journal of Business Economics