open access
메뉴
open access
메뉴
ISSN : 1229-0718
This study examined how intentions interacted with desires to predict the emotional consequences, and lead to the conventional judgments of protagonists' behaviors. Forty five children (5-, 6-, and 8-year-olds) and 15 undergraduate students were presented with situations in which desires were satisfied with intentions or without intentions, and desires were not satisfied with intentions or without intentions. The results showed that the subjects attributed positive emotions to the protagonists whose desires were satisfied, and negative emotions to them whose desires were not satisfied. The emotional predictions were influenced by intentions as well. They more frequently attributed positive emotions to the protagonists who intended to fulfill their desires than the protagonists who do not have such intentions, and attributed negative emotions to the protagonists who could not satisfy their desires even though they intended to fulfill them. The conventional judgments were also influenced by intentions. The subjects more negatively evaluated the protagonists' acts that violated the rules with intentions than without intentions. They evaluated negatively the intended violation even though the protagonists did not end up with violating the rules. The results were discussed in terms of the relation between theory of mind and deontic reasoning.
김시은, 정영숙(2000). 도덕 판단에서 취학전 아동의 의도사용과 의도성 구분의 발달. 한국심리학회지: 발달, 13(1), 49-64.
전명숙, 김혜리(1999). 정서추론으로 살펴본 믿음과 바람에 대한 아동의 이해. 인간발달연구 6(1). 102-121.
Arsenio, W. F. (1988). Children's Conceptions of the situational Affective Consequences of Sociomoral Events. Child Development, 59, 1611-1622.
Arsenio, W. F., & Kramer, R. (1992). Victimizers and Their Victims: Children's Conceptions of the Mixed Emotional Consequences of Moral Transgressions. Child Development, 63, 915-927.
Astington, J. W., & Gopnik, A. (1991). Developing understanding of desire and intention. In A. Whiten(Ed.), Natural theories of mind Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell.
Bratman, M. E. (1987). Intentions, plans, and practical reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Carpenter, M., Aktar, N., & Tomasello, M. (1996). Fourteen- through 18-month-old infants differentially imitate intentional and accidental actions. Infant Behavior and Development, 21, 315-330.
Chandler, M. J., Greenspan, S., & Barenboim, C. (1973). Judgments of intentionality in response to videotaped and verbally presented moraldilemmas: The medium is the message. Child Development, 44, 315-320.
Costanzo, P. R., Coie, J. D., Grumet, J. F., & Farnill, D. (1973). A Reexamination of the Effects of Intent and Consequence on Children's Moral Judgments. Child Development, 44, 154-161.
Keller, M., Gummerum, N., Wang, X., & Lindsey, S. (2004). Understanding perspectives and emotions in contract violation: Development of deontic and moral reasoning. Child Development, 74, 614-635.
Lagattuta, K. H. (2005). When You Shouldn't Do What You Want to Do: Young Children's Understanding of Desires, Rules, and Emotions. Child Development, 76, 713-733.
Malle, B. F. (2006). Intentionality, Morality, and Their Relationship in Human Judgment. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 6, 87-112.
Malle, B. F., & Knobe, J. (2001). The Distinction between Desire and Intention: A Folk-Conceptual Analysis. In B. F. Malle, L. J. Moses, & D. A. Baldwin(Eds.), Intentionsand Intentionality: Foundations of Social Cognition. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Meltzoff, A. N. (1995). Understanding the intentions of others: Re-enactment of intended acts by 18-month-old children. Developmental Psychology, 31, 838-850.
Nelson, S. (1980). Factors Influencing Young Children's Use of Motives and Outcomes as Moral Criteria. Child Development, 51, 823-829.
Núñez, M., & Harris, P. L. (1998). Psychological and deontic concepts: Separate domains or intimate connection. Mind and Language, 13, 153-170.
Nunner-Winkler, G., & Sodian, B. (1988). Children's understanding of moral emotions. Child Development, 59, 1323-1338.
Peterson, C. C., & Siegal, P. (2002). Mindreading and moral awareness in popular and rejected preschoolers. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20, 205-224.
Schult, C. A. (2002). Children's Understanding of the Distinction between Intention and Desires. Child Development, 73, 1727-1747.
Searle, J. R. (1983). Intentionality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wellman, H. M. (1990). The child's theory of mind. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books.
Wellman, H. M., & Lagattuta, K. H. (2000). Developing understandings of mind. In S. Baron-Cohen, H. Tager-Flusberg, & D. Cohen (Eds.), Understanding other minds: Perspectives from developmental cognitive neuroscience (2nd ed., pp. 21-49). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wellman, H. M., & Miller, J. G. (2008). Including Deontic Reasoning as Fundamental to Theory of Mind. Human Development, 51, 105-135.
Wellman, H. M., & Woolley, J. D. (1990). From simple desires to ordinary beliefs: The early development of everyday psychology. Cognition, 35, 245-275.
Zelazo, P. D., Helwig, C. C., & Lau, A. (1996). Intention, Act, and Outcome in Behavioral Prediction and Moral Judgment, Child Development, 67, 2478-2492.