바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Infants’ ability to understand others’ action goals by using morphological information

Abstract

The current study investigated whether infants could infer others’ goals by using morphological information. In Experiment 1, 19-month-olds were familiarized with scenes in which an actor slid one of two objects forward and backward, uttering a novel word as either a verb (verb condition) or a noun (noun condition). During the pre-test display, the positions of the two objects were switched; the prior goal object was placed within a short frame and the other object was placed within a long frame. In the test trial, the actor grasped the non-slidable prior goal object (short frame/prior goal event) or the slidable non-prior goal object (long frame/non-prior goal event). Infants in the verb condition looked longer at the short frame/prior goal event than at the long frame/non-prior goal event. Infants in the noun condition looked about equally at the two events. In Experiment 2, in which no novel word was uttered during familiarization trials, we found the same pattern as in the noun condition of Experiment 1. Thus, verbs, but not nouns, led infants to interpret the actor’s goal as an action style. Experiment 3, in which 15-month-olds participated in the task used in Experiment 1, demonstrated that infants’ ability to use morphological information when understanding others’ goals develops between 15 and 19 months.

keywords
Submission Date
2015-04-15
Revised Date
2015-06-07
Accepted Date
2015-06-09

Reference

1.

김민영, 송현주 (2008). 타인의 가리키기 행동의 목표 이해 발달: 7,9개월 한국 영아 자료. 한국심리학회지: 발달, 21(3), 41-61.

2.

김은영, 송현주 (2011a). 만 14개월 한국 영아들의 합리적 모방 능력. 한국심리학회지:발달, 24(2), 123-136.

3.

김은영, 송현주 (2011b). 형태론적 정보를 활용한 만 3세 아동의 타인행동 모방능력. 한국심리학회지: 발달, 24(4), 83-97.

4.

이지현, 김민영, 송현주 (2012). 언어 정보를이용한 만 7개월 한국 영아들의 가리키기행동의 목표 이해 능력. 한국심리학회지:발달, 25(1), 63-75.

5.

Akhtar, N., & Tomasello, M. (2000). The social nature of words and word learning. In R. M. Golinkoff & K. Hirsh-Pasek (Eds.), Becoming a word learner: A debate on lexical acquisition (pp. 115-135). Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.

6.

Behne, T., Carpenter, M., Call, J., & Tomasello,M. (2005). Unwilling versus unable:Infants’ understanding of intentional action. Developmental Psychology, 41, 328-337.

7.

Biro, S., & Leslie, A. M. (2007). Infants’perception of goal-directed actions:Development through cue-based bootstrapping. Developmental Science, 10, 379-398.

8.

Carpenter, M., Akhtar, N., & Tomasello, M.(1998). Fourteen-through 18 month-old infants differentially imitate intentional and accidental actions. Infant Behavior and Development, 21, 315-330.

9.

Carpenter, M., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2005). Twelve- and 18-month-olds imitate actions in terms of goals. Developmental Science, 8, F13-F20.

10.

Chen, M. L., & Waxman, S. R., (2013). “Shall we blick?”: Novel words highlight actors’underlying intentions for 14-month-old infants. Developmental Psychology, 49, 426-431.

11.

Dewar, K. M., & Xu, F. (2007). Do 9-month-old infants expect distinct words to refer to kinds? Developmental Psychology, 43, 1227-1238.

12.

Gergely, G., Bekkering, H., & Király, I. (2002). Rational imitation in preverbal infants. Nature, 415, 755.

13.

Gergely, G., Nádasdy, Z., Csibra, G., & Bíró, S.(1995). Taking the intentional stance at 12months of age. Cognition, 56, 165-193.

14.

Hohle, B., Weissenborn, J., Kiefer, D., Schulz, A.,& Schmitz, M. (2004). Functional elements in infants’ speech processing: The role of determiners in segmentation and categorization of lexical elements. Infancy, 5, 341-53.

15.

Jin, K. (2009). The role of verbal information in reasoning about others’ actions in infancy. Unpublished master dissertation. Yonsei University, Seoul.

16.

Martin, A., Onishi, K. H., & Vouloumanos, A.(2012). Understanding the abstract role of speech in communication at 12 months. Cognition, 123, 50-60.

17.

Meltzoff, A. N. (1995). Understanding the intentions of others: Re-enactment of intended acts by 18-month-old children. Developmental Psychology, 31, 838-850.

18.

Mintz, T. H. (2006). Finding the verbs:Distributional cues to categories available to young learners. In K. Hirsh-Pasek & R. M. Golinkoff (eds), Action meets word, 31-63. New York: Oxford University Press.

19.

Namy, L. L., & Waxman, S. R. (2000). Naming and exclaiming: Infants’ sensitivity to naming contexts. Journal of Cognition and Development, 1, 405-428.

20.

Sommerville, J. A., Woodward, A. L., & Needham,A. (2005). Action experience alters 3-monthold infants’ perception of others’ actions. Cognition, 96, B1-B11.

21.

Song, H., & Baillargeon, R. (2007). Can 9.5-month-old infants attribute to an agent a disposition to perform an action on objects? Acta Psychologica, 124, 79-105.

22.

Song, H., Baillargeon, R., & Fisher, C. (2005). Can infants attribute to an agent a disposition to perform a particular action? Cognition, 98, B45-B55.

23.

Song, H., Baillargeon, R., & Fisher, C. (2014). The development of infants’ use of novel verbal information when reasoning about others’ actions. PLoS ONE, 9, e92387.

24.

Spaepen, E., & Spelke, E. (2007). Will any doll do? 12-month-olds’ reasoning about goal objects. Cognitive Psychology, 54, 133-154.

25.

Tomasello, M. (2006). Acquiring linguistic constructions. In D. Kuhn & R. Siegler (Eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology. New York:Wiley.

26.

Tomasello, M., & Akhtar, N. (1995). Two-yearolds use pragmatic cues to differentiate reference to objects and actions. Cognitive Development, 10, 201-224.

27.

Vouloumanos, A., Martin, A., & Onishi, K. H.(2014). Do 6-month-olds understand that speech can communicate? Developmental Science, 17, 872- 879.

28.

Waxman, S. R., Lidz, J., Braun, I. E., & Lavin,T. (2009). Twenty-four-month-old infants’interpretations of novel verbs and nouns in dynamic scenes. Cognitive Psychology, 59, 67-95.

29.

Woodward, A. L. (1998). Infants selectively encode the goal object of an actor’s reach. Cognition, 69, 1-34.

30.

Woodward, A. L., & Guajardo, J. J. (2002). Infants’ understanding of the point gesture as an object-directed action. Cognitive Development, 17, 1061-1084.

logo